French Burchard: Difference between revisions

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
Undo revision 40826 by Christof Rolker (talk)
Tag: Undo
Line 1: Line 1:
== Checklists ==
==Checklists==
* [[Checklist Burchard long]]
*[[Checklist Burchard long]]
* '''[[Checklist Burchard very short]]'''
*'''[[Checklist Burchard very short]]'''
* Pending the publication of Daniel Gneckow's paper on the Italian Burchard, we will also have a [[Checklist Burchard|very complete checklist]]
*Pending the publication of Daniel Gneckow's paper on the Italian Burchard, we will also have a [[Checklist Burchard|very complete checklist]]


== Collections ==
==Collections==
In the paper, only collections extant in at least two copies are covered; for works extant in only one manuscript, it is often difficult to say whether they are "collections" at all (as opposed to excerpts, or variants of other collections) and whether they had any impact beyond their place of origin. In any case, taking them into account would not change the bigger picture; roughly half of them draw on Burchard (Atrebatensis), the other half does not.
*[[Collectio XVII librorum]] (see [[Collectio XVII librorum analysis]])
*[[Collectio XVII librorum]] (see [[Collectio XVII librorum analysis]])
*[[Collectio Burdegalensis]] (see [[Collectio Burdegalensis analysis]])
*[[Collectio Burdegalensis]] (see [[Collectio Burdegalensis analysis]])
Line 10: Line 11:
*[[Collectio Sanctae Genovevae]] (see [[Collectio Sanctae Genovevae analysis]]
*[[Collectio Sanctae Genovevae]] (see [[Collectio Sanctae Genovevae analysis]]


== Manuscripts ==
==Manuscripts==
=== Map: Overview over Burchard manuscripts written or preserved in the area of modern France (plus Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Alsace) ===
The reception of Burchard in France has not been studied in detail. Cushing suggested that it was "not negligible", though she counted only "some 13" copies to be French: "Only some 13 of the extant manuscripts are French and none of these date before 1050." (p. 39).
 
===Map: Overview over Burchard manuscripts written or preserved in the area of modern France (plus Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Alsace)===


Note that our list of 24 manuscript does not include [[Paris, BnF, lat. 2389]] (misidentified as a Burchard copy sometimes), and that we treat the ''codex discissus''  [[Paris, BnF, lat. 4283]]/[[Troyes, BM, 1386]] as one manuscript.
Note that our list of 24 manuscript does not include [[Paris, BnF, lat. 2389]] (misidentified as a Burchard copy sometimes), and that we treat the ''codex discissus''  [[Paris, BnF, lat. 4283]]/[[Troyes, BM, 1386]] as one manuscript.
Line 348: Line 351:
</mapframe>
</mapframe>


=== Manuscripts ===
===Manuscripts===
C
C


* [[Chartres, BM, 161]] (see [[Chartres, BM, 161 analysis]])
*[[Chartres, BM, 161]] (see [[Chartres, BM, 161 analysis]])


D
D

Revision as of 13:39, 9 October 2025

Checklists

Collections

In the paper, only collections extant in at least two copies are covered; for works extant in only one manuscript, it is often difficult to say whether they are "collections" at all (as opposed to excerpts, or variants of other collections) and whether they had any impact beyond their place of origin. In any case, taking them into account would not change the bigger picture; roughly half of them draw on Burchard (Atrebatensis), the other half does not.

Manuscripts

The reception of Burchard in France has not been studied in detail. Cushing suggested that it was "not negligible", though she counted only "some 13" copies to be French: "Only some 13 of the extant manuscripts are French and none of these date before 1050." (p. 39).

Map: Overview over Burchard manuscripts written or preserved in the area of modern France (plus Belgium, Luxembourg, and the Alsace)

Note that our list of 24 manuscript does not include Paris, BnF, lat. 2389 (misidentified as a Burchard copy sometimes), and that we treat the codex discissus Paris, BnF, lat. 4283/Troyes, BM, 1386 as one manuscript.

Map

Manuscripts

C

D

L

M

O

P

R

S

T

V

W