Dictatus papae: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Category:Collection]]" to "Category:Canonical Collection]]") |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Dictatus papae''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Dictatus papae''}} | ||
{{Infobox collection | |||
The list of 27 propositions entitled ''Dictatus papae'' is preserved in the register of Gregory VII ([[Città del Vaticano, Archivio Apostolico Vaticano, Reg. Vat. 2|Reg. Vat. 2]]) and in the twelfth-century copy of that register in [[Troyes, BM, 952]] on fol. 49–50. Its entry number in the edition is 2. 55a, and it is found between two letters written on March 3, 1075, one to the faithful of Lodi and one to Manasses of Reims. It is also found in the ''[[Collectio Tarraconensis I|Collectio Tarraconensis]]'' (6. 42), and excerpts are appended to the Turin ''[[Collectio VII librorum in Torino, BNU, D. IV. 33|Collectio VII librorum]]'' {{FM|159}}. The ''Dictatus'' will not be analysed separately here. | | size = Very small (less than 100 canons) | ||
| century = saec. XI | |||
| normregion = Central Italy | |||
| generalregion = Southern Europe and Mediterranean | |||
| specificregion = Rome | |||
| title = Dictatus papae | |||
| author1 = Fowler-Magerl, Linda | |||
}} | |||
The list of 27 propositions entitled ''Dictatus papae'' is preserved in the register of Gregory VII ([[Città del Vaticano, Archivio Apostolico Vaticano, Reg. Vat. 2|Reg. Vat. 2]]) and in the twelfth-century copy of that register in [[Troyes, BM, 952]] on fol. 49–50. Its entry number in the edition is 2. 55a, and it is found between two letters written on March 3, 1075, one to the faithful of Lodi and one to Manasses of Reims. It is also found in the ''[[Collectio Tarraconensis I|Collectio Tarraconensis]]'' (6. 42), and excerpts are appended to the Turin ''[[Collectio VII librorum in Torino, BNU, D. IV. 33|Collectio VII librorum]]'' [{{FM|159}}]. The ''Dictatus'' will not be analysed separately here. | |||
The radical nature of the propositions and the extremely limited circulation require explanation. The propositions were probably intended as guidelines for papal legates as well as for the canonists at Rome from whom Gregory VII hoped to receive a canon law collection suited to his purposes. Hugo of Die apparently revealed the propositions at the council of Poitiers in 1078, and they were received into the ''Collectio Tarraconensis''. In Rome and Tuscany they influenced canonists. The influence on [[Deusdedit, Collectio canonum|Deusdedit]] is apparent. Single propositions with claims similar to those in the ''Dictatus papae'' are found in a group of related collections. For example, the late 11th century [[Collectio II librorum/VIII partium|''Collection in Two Books/Eight Parts'']] (VB01.073) and the [[Collectio XIII librorum in Berlin, SBPK, Savigny 3|''13L'' in Berlin, SBPK, Savigny 3]] (SA10.149) have the rubric: ''Quod papa possit reges deponere et excommunicare et per scriptum''. | The radical nature of the propositions and the extremely limited circulation require explanation. The propositions were probably intended as guidelines for papal legates as well as for the canonists at Rome from whom Gregory VII hoped to receive a canon law collection suited to his purposes. Hugo of Die apparently revealed the propositions at the council of Poitiers in 1078, and they were received into the ''Collectio Tarraconensis''. In Rome and Tuscany they influenced canonists. The influence on [[Deusdedit, Collectio canonum|Deusdedit]] is apparent. Single propositions with claims similar to those in the ''Dictatus papae'' are found in a group of related collections. For example, the late 11th century [[Collectio II librorum/VIII partium|''Collection in Two Books/Eight Parts'']] (VB01.073) and the [[Collectio XIII librorum in Berlin, SBPK, Savigny 3|''13L'' in Berlin, SBPK, Savigny 3]] (SA10.149) have the rubric: ''Quod papa possit reges deponere et excommunicare et per scriptum''. | ||
Line 12: | Line 20: | ||
==Categories== | ==Categories== | ||
* collection not in Clavis [[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]] [[Category:Collection]] | * collection not in Clavis [[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]] [[Category:Canonical Collection]] | ||
* belongs to Dictatus papae group [[Category:Collection belonging to Dictatus papae group]] | * belongs to Dictatus papae group [[Category:Collection belonging to Dictatus papae group]] | ||
* very small (less than 100 canons) collection [[Category:very small (less than 100 canons) collection]] | * very small (less than 100 canons) collection [[Category:very small (less than 100 canons) collection]] | ||
* from Rome / Central Italy [[Category:Collection from Rome]] [[Category:Collection from Central Italy]] | * from Rome / Central Italy [[Category:Collection from Rome]] [[Category:Collection from Central Italy]] | ||
* saec. XI (1075) [[Category:Collection saec XI]] | * saec. XI (1075) [[Category:Collection saec XI]] |
Latest revision as of 22:15, 8 August 2024
Title | Dictatus papae |
---|---|
Key | ? |
Size | Very small (less than 100 canons) |
Century | saec. XI |
European region of origin | Central Italy |
General region of origin | Southern Europe and Mediterranean |
Specific region of origin | Rome |
Main author | Fowler-Magerl, Linda |
The list of 27 propositions entitled Dictatus papae is preserved in the register of Gregory VII (Reg. Vat. 2) and in the twelfth-century copy of that register in Troyes, BM, 952 on fol. 49–50. Its entry number in the edition is 2. 55a, and it is found between two letters written on March 3, 1075, one to the faithful of Lodi and one to Manasses of Reims. It is also found in the Collectio Tarraconensis (6. 42), and excerpts are appended to the Turin Collectio VII librorum [159]. The Dictatus will not be analysed separately here.
The radical nature of the propositions and the extremely limited circulation require explanation. The propositions were probably intended as guidelines for papal legates as well as for the canonists at Rome from whom Gregory VII hoped to receive a canon law collection suited to his purposes. Hugo of Die apparently revealed the propositions at the council of Poitiers in 1078, and they were received into the Collectio Tarraconensis. In Rome and Tuscany they influenced canonists. The influence on Deusdedit is apparent. Single propositions with claims similar to those in the Dictatus papae are found in a group of related collections. For example, the late 11th century Collection in Two Books/Eight Parts (VB01.073) and the 13L in Berlin, SBPK, Savigny 3 (SA10.149) have the rubric: Quod papa possit reges deponere et excommunicare et per scriptum.
The closest known parallel to the Dictatus papae is the so-called Dictatus of Avranches or Proprie auctoritates apostolice sedis.
Literature
The Dictatus papae was edited by Erich Caspar in MGH Epp. sel. 2.201 ff. Its influence on Deusdedit has long been recognized. See Blumenthal, Fälschungen bei Kanonisten, p. 253 and n. 45 and 46. See also Horst Fuhrmann, Papst Gregor VII. und das Kirchenrecht zum Problem des Dictatus papae, Studi Gregoriani 13 (1989), pp. 123–147.
Categories
- collection not in Clavis
- belongs to Dictatus papae group
- very small (less than 100 canons) collection
- from Rome / Central Italy
- saec. XI (1075)