Collectio Quesnelliana: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Text replacement - "\{\{Author\|Kéry\}\}, Collections, ([0-9][0-9])" to "{{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery|$1}}")
No edit summary
 
(30 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Collectio Quesnelliana''}}
{{Infobox collection
    | century  = saec. Vex/VIin
    | wikidata = Q16827374
    | title    = Collectio Quesnelliana
    | alttitle3 =  Quesnel’sche Sammlung (Maassen)
    | alttitle2 = Collectio Quesneliana (Schwartz)
    | author1  = [[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]]
    | mss = some (2–9)
    | generalregion = Gaul or Italy
    | tpq = 494
    | alttitle1 = Codex canonum et constitutorum Sedis apostolicae (Quesnel)
}}
The ''Quesnelliana'' (after Pasquier Quesnel, the first editor) is one of the earliest canonical collections from Western Europe, probably dating from around the year 500. The collection contains mainly dogmatic texts, including many letters of Leo the Great. The extensive collection had some influence in the early Middle Ages, especially in Gaul.
The ''Quesnelliana'' (after Pasquier Quesnel, the first editor) is one of the earliest canonical collections from Western Europe, probably dating from around the year 500. The collection contains mainly dogmatic texts, including many letters of Leo the Great. The extensive collection had some influence in the early Middle Ages, especially in Gaul.


Line 9: Line 24:


== Date and place of origin ==
== Date and place of origin ==
There was considerable controvery on the place of origin from the 16th to the 19th century. Quesnel claimed without convincing reasons that the collection was to be understood as a law book of the Roman Church and therefore originated in Rome. The Ballerini brothers and Maassen assumed, on the basis of the origin of the manuscripts, that the ''Quesnelliana'' was from Gaul. Duchesne (followed by Turner) adopted Arles as the home of the collection. Van der Speeten has pointed to parallels with the ''Dionysiana'' and argued that the latter collection was indeed a source of the ''Quesnelliana'', in which case an Italian (Roman) home for the collection would be likely.
There was considerable controversy on the place of origin from the 16th to the 19th century. Quesnel claimed without convincing reasons that the collection was to be understood as a law book of the Roman Church and therefore originated in Rome. The Ballerini brothers and later Maassen assumed, on the basis of the origin of the manuscripts, that the ''Quesnelliana'' was from Gaul. Duchesne (followed by Turner) adopted Arles as the home of the collection. Van der Speeten has pointed to parallels with the ''[[Collectio Dionysiana I|Dionysiana]]'' and argued that the latter collection was indeed a source of the ''Quesnelliana'', in which case an Italian (Roman) home for the collection would be likely.


The exact dating is also uncertain. The most recent piece is the ''Generale decretum'' (JK 636) of Gelasius I from 494. It is generally assumed that the ''Quesnelliana'' was written during this pope's lifetime (so before 496). However, a later date cannot be ruled out. If the ''Quesnelliana'' relies on the ''[[Collectio Dionysiana I|Dionysiana]]'', as Van der Speeten held, a later date would indeed be more likely.
The exact dating is also uncertain. The most recent piece is the ''Generale decretum'' (JK 636) of Gelasius I from 494. It is generally assumed that the ''Quesnelliana'' was written during this pope's lifetime (so before 496). However, a later date cannot be ruled out. If the ''Quesnelliana'' relies on the ''Dionysiana'', as Van der Speeten held, a later date would indeed be more likely.


== Reception ==
== Reception ==
The surviving manuscripts all come from Gaul and were produced in the eighth and ninth centuries. The collection was also used in the Frankish Empire, namely at the Council of Verneuil in 755.
For manuscripts, see [[:Category:Manuscript of Collectio Quesnelliana]] (number of entries: {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Manuscript of Collectio Quesnelliana}}).
 
The surviving manuscripts all come from Gaul and were produced in the eighth and ninth centuries. The collection was also used in the Frankish Empire, namely at the Council of Verneuil in 755. Kéry, pp. {{Kéry|27}}-28 lists the following manuscripts:
* [[Arras, Bibliothéque municipale, 644]] (572), saec. VIII-IX, probably Northeastern France or Northwestern Austrasia
* [[Einsiedeln, Stiftsbibliothek, Codex 191]], saec. VIII-IX, probably Northeastern France or Northwestern Austrasia
* [[Oxford, Oriel College Library, 42]], saec. XII (William of Malmesbury!)
* [[Paris, BnF, lat. 1454]], saec. IX3/4
* [[Paris, BnF, lat. 3842A]], saec. IX
* [[Paris, BnF, lat. 3848A]], saec. IX
* [[Wien, ÖNB, Cod. 2141]], about 780, from the region around Lorsch
* [[Wien, ÖNB, Cod. 2147]], about 780, from the region around Lorsch
* [[Düsseldorf, ULB, E.32]], fragment
 
See also [[Paris, BnF, lat. 1455]] a collection drawing on the ''Quesnelliana'', and [[Città del Vaticano, BAV, lat. 4982|BAV, lat. 4982]] for a 16th c. copy of excerpts
 
== Editions ==
* {{Author|Quesnel}}'s editio princeps of 1675: https://archive.org/details/quesnel-1675-appendix-ii/page/n8/mode/1up
* The {{Author|Ballerini}} edition of 1757: https://archive.org/details/sanctileonismagn03leoi/page/n338/mode/1up
** {{Author|Migne}}'s reprint thereof: https://archive.org/details/patrologiaecurs151unkngoog/page/n184/mode/1up


== Literature ==
== Literature ==
{{Author|Elliot}}, Canon Law; {{Author|Jasper}}, Beginning, 41-64; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery|27}}–29; {{Author|Maassen}}, Geschichte 1.490–500; Joseph {{Author|van der Speeten}}: Le dossier de Nicée dans la Quesnelliana, in: Sacris erudiri, 28, 1985, pp. 383–450.
{{Author|Maassen}}, Geschichte, pp. {{Maassen|486}}–500; Joseph {{Author|van der Speeten}}: Le dossier de Nicée dans la Quesnelliana, in: Sacris erudiri, 28, 1985, pp. 383–450; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections pp. {{Kery|27}}–29; {{Author|Jasper}}, Beginning pp. {{JasperFuhrmann|41}}-64; {{Author|Elliot}}, Canon Law; Aäron {{author|Vanspauwen}}, [Review of:] Matthew J. J. Hoskin: The Manuscripts of Leo the Great’s Letters. The Transmission and Reception of Papal Documents in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, in: Plekos 24 (2023), pp. 587–599. https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/propylaeumdok/5836/
See Petoletti, Un frammento del sec. IX della "Collectio Quesnelliana" nell'Archivio Capitolare della Basilica di S. Ambrogio a Milano. In: Aevum vol. 82 (2008) p. 293-312


== Categories ==
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]
* Not in database [[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]
[[Category:Collection saec V]]
* probably compiled still in Gelasius' lifetime, saec. V [[Category:Collection saec V]]
[[Category:Collection saec VI]]
* place of origin unclear [[Category:Collection of which the place of origin is unknown/missing]]
[[Category:Collection of which the place of origin is unknown or missing]]  
* size?
[[Category:Collection from Southern Europe and Mediterranean]]
* Collection [[Category:Collection]]
[[Category:Canonical Collection]] [[Category:Letter Collection]]

Latest revision as of 20:51, 15 December 2024


Title Collectio Quesnelliana
Key ?
Alternative title Codex canonum et constitutorum Sedis apostolicae (Quesnel)
Alternative title Collectio Quesneliana (Schwartz)
Alternative title Quesnel’sche Sammlung (Maassen)
Wikidata Item no. Q16827374
Terminus post quem 494
Century saec. Vex/VIin
General region of origin Gaul or Italy
Main author Christof Rolker
No. of manuscripts some (2–9)


The Quesnelliana (after Pasquier Quesnel, the first editor) is one of the earliest canonical collections from Western Europe, probably dating from around the year 500. The collection contains mainly dogmatic texts, including many letters of Leo the Great. The extensive collection had some influence in the early Middle Ages, especially in Gaul.

Sources, content and structure

The collection is divided into 98 chapters (capitula), each of which contains several canons; the capitulatio lists all 98 titles. The first five chapters are from ecumenical as well as African councils (cap. 1 contains the Creed of Nicaea, the list of bishops, the preface and the 27 canons of this council). The middle part of the Quesnelliana (cap. 6-57) consists of conciliar canons, decretals, imperial constitutions and edicts, episcopal letters, and excerpts from the Church Fathers on dogmatic questions (Christology, Council of Chalcedon, Acacian Schism, Pelagianism). Chapters 58-98 are letters of Leo the Great on questions of dogma and discipline, including the so-called Tomus (JK 423).

The individual chapters are dedicated to a theme or taken from one formal source, but are themselves arranged neither thematically nor chronologically. Predominantly, the Quesnelliana contains materials intended to strengthen Leo I's position in the conflicts surrounding the Acacian Schism.

The Quesnelliana uses Latin translations of the Greek councils, which are older than those of Dionysius Exiguus and the Prisca translation.

Date and place of origin

There was considerable controversy on the place of origin from the 16th to the 19th century. Quesnel claimed without convincing reasons that the collection was to be understood as a law book of the Roman Church and therefore originated in Rome. The Ballerini brothers and later Maassen assumed, on the basis of the origin of the manuscripts, that the Quesnelliana was from Gaul. Duchesne (followed by Turner) adopted Arles as the home of the collection. Van der Speeten has pointed to parallels with the Dionysiana and argued that the latter collection was indeed a source of the Quesnelliana, in which case an Italian (Roman) home for the collection would be likely.

The exact dating is also uncertain. The most recent piece is the Generale decretum (JK 636) of Gelasius I from 494. It is generally assumed that the Quesnelliana was written during this pope's lifetime (so before 496). However, a later date cannot be ruled out. If the Quesnelliana relies on the Dionysiana, as Van der Speeten held, a later date would indeed be more likely.

Reception

For manuscripts, see Category:Manuscript of Collectio Quesnelliana (number of entries: 9).

The surviving manuscripts all come from Gaul and were produced in the eighth and ninth centuries. The collection was also used in the Frankish Empire, namely at the Council of Verneuil in 755. Kéry, pp. 27-28 lists the following manuscripts:

See also Paris, BnF, lat. 1455 a collection drawing on the Quesnelliana, and BAV, lat. 4982 for a 16th c. copy of excerpts

Editions

Literature

Maassen, Geschichte, pp. 486–500; Joseph van der Speeten: Le dossier de Nicée dans la Quesnelliana, in: Sacris erudiri, 28, 1985, pp. 383–450; Kéry, Collections pp. 27–29; Jasper, Beginning pp. 41-64; Elliot, Canon Law; Aäron Vanspauwen, [Review of:] Matthew J. J. Hoskin: The Manuscripts of Leo the Great’s Letters. The Transmission and Reception of Papal Documents in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages, in: Plekos 24 (2023), pp. 587–599. https://archiv.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/propylaeumdok/5836/ See Petoletti, Un frammento del sec. IX della "Collectio Quesnelliana" nell'Archivio Capitolare della Basilica di S. Ambrogio a Milano. In: Aevum vol. 82 (2008) p. 293-312

Retrieved from "https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php?title=Collectio_Quesnelliana&oldid=14064"