Wien, ÖNB, Cod. 2141

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
Revision as of 12:33, 23 October 2025 by TStueber (talk | contribs) (added author, adapted text to Clavis layout)
Library Wien, ÖNB
Shelfmark Cod. 2141
Century saec. VIII-IX
Provenance
European region of origin Western Germany
Specific region of origin Region around Lorsch
Collection Collectio Quesnelliana
Digital Images ub.uni-heidelberg.de
Description at bibliotheca-laureshamensis-digital
Description at 2 2014 description by Kautz
CLA CLA X 1505
Bischoff number 7218 on p. 491
Author Christof Rolker
Author Till Stüber


Wien, ÖNB, Cod. 2141 is a partial copy of the Collectio Quesnelliana. Because their exemplar was incomplete, the scribes supplemented the Quesnelliana using a copy of the Corpus canonum Africano-Romanum (on fol. 98v-101v and 103v-115v). The documents taken from the Corpus canonum Africano-Romanum are the synods of Antioch (partial), Laodicaea, Constantinople and Carthage 419. According to Turner, the exemplar these texts were copied from was closer to the archetype of this collection than the more complete manuscripts München, BSB, Clm 6243 and Würzburg, Universitätsbibliothek, M.p.th.f. 146. See below for fol. 106r-115v.

Perhaps (Bischoff) or "manifestly" (CLA) from Lorsch, dated saec. VIII/IX (CLA, Bischoff) or about 780 (Kéry).

Contents

The following table shows the contents of the manscript, indicating for each document whether it was copied from the Quesnelliana or the Corpus canonum Africano-Romanum (CCAR). The numbering of the Quesnelliana chapters is taken from the contents list of Elliot, Canon Law Collections in England ca 600–1066, pp. 214-218.

Note that the synod of Antioch represents a combination of both collections: on fol. 98v, in the midst of canon 1 of Antioch, the Quesnelliana text breaks off at uel presbyter uel diaconus (presumably due to a lacuna in the exemplar). With lighter ink, the scribe continues in the same line with the wording of the Corpus canonum Africano-Romanum: post hanc definitionem ausus etc.

No. Contents Folios Quesnelliana CCAR
1 Nicaea 325 – Creed 1r 1a
2 Nicaea 325 – subscriptions 1r–2r 1b
3 Nicaea 325 – Short preface „Cum convenisset“ 2r 1c
4 Nicaea 325 – canons (Isidoriana) 2r–3v 1d
5 Serdica 342 3v–6v 1e
6 Carthage 397 – Praefatio / Breviarium Hipponense 6v–10r 2
7 Ancyra 314 (Isidoriana) 10r-12r 3
8 Neocaesarea 314/5 (Isidoriana) 12v–13r 4
9 Gangra 340/1 (Isidoriana) 13r–14v 5
10 Carthage 416 – synodal letter „Cum ex more“ 14v–15v 6
11 Innocent I „In requirendis Dei“ (J3 708) 15v–17r 7
12 Mileve 416 – synodal letter „Quia te Dominus“ 17r–v 8
13 Innocent I „Inter ceteras Romanae“ (J3 709) 18r–v 9
14 Letter of African bishops to Innocent I „De conciliis“ 18v–22r 10
15 Innocent I „Fraternitatis vestrae“ (J3 710) 22r–23r 11
16 Innocent I „In familiaribus scriptis“ (J3 711) 23r 12
17 Carthage 418 23r–24r 13
18 Rescript of Honorius and Theodosius II „Ad conturbandam“ 24r–v 14
19 Edict of the PPO Palladius „In Pelagium“ 25r 15
20 Honorius and Theodosius II to Aurelius of Carthage „Dudum quidem“ 25r 16
21 Aurelius of Carthage „Dilectissimis“ 25r–v 17
22 Augustinus of Hippo „Tandem aliquando“ – Auszug 25v–26r 18
23 Constitution of Constantius III „Quae cum praeteritae“ 26r–v 19
24 Edict of PVR Volusianus „Hactenus Caelestium“ 26v 20
25 Innocent I „Consulenti tibi“ (J3 675) 26v–28r 21
26 Innocent I „Magna me gratulatio“ (J3 691) 28r–30r 22
27 Innocent I „Si instituta“ (J3 701) 30r–31v 23
28 Innocent I „Etsi tibi“ (J3 665) 31v–33v 24
29 Chalcedon 451 (Prisca) 33v–37v 25
30 Constitution of Valentinian III and Marcian „Tandem aliquando“ 37v–38r 26
31 Constitution of Marcian „Venerabilem catholicae“ 38r–v 27
32 Constitution of Marcian „Licet iam sacratissima“ 38v–40r 28
33 Siricius „Directa“ (J3 605) 40r–43r 29
34 Siricius „Optarem semper“ (J3 613) 43r–44r 30
35 Ambrosius of Milan „Recognovimus“ 44r–45v 31
36 Zosimus “Exigit dilectio” (J3 745) 45v–46v 32
37 Zosimus “Ex relatione fratris” (J3 750) 46v–47r 33
38 Boniface I „Difficile quidem“ (J3 790) 47r–v 34
39 Celestine I „Cuperemus quidem“ (J3 821) 47v–49r 35
40 Celestine I „Nulli sacerdotum“ (J3 823) 49r–v 36
41 Expositio fidei „Nos patrem“ 49v 37
42 Confessio Faustini presbyteri „Sufficiebat“ 49v–50r 38
43 De fide Nicaena 50r–v 39
44 Libellus Augustini de fide catholica 50v–51r 40
45 Leo I „Promisisse me“ (J3 1092) – appendix 51r–54v 41
46 Constantinople 448 54v–57v 42
47 Narrationis ordo de pravitate Dioscori Alexandrini 57v–58v 43
48 Simplicius „Cogitationum ferias“ (J3 1191) 59r 44
49 Acacius of Constantinople „Sollicitudinem omnium“ 59r–v 45
50 Felix III „Multarum transgressionum“ (J3 1214) 59v–60r 46
51 Gelasius I “Ne forte quod” (J3 1360) 60v–65r 47
52 Gelasius I “Ego quoque mente” (J3 1256) 65r–67r 48
53 Gelasius I „Famuli vestrae pietatis“ (J3 1277) 67r–70v 49
54 Gelasius I „Valde mirati sumus“ (J3 1278) 70v–75v 50
55 Gelasius I „Quod ergo isti“ (J3 1311) 75v–81r 51
56 Athanasius of Alexandria „Ego quidem“ 81r–85r 52
57 Cyril of Alexandria „Laetentur caeli“ 85r–87r 53a
58 Formula libelli fidei „Ego ille“ 87r–v 53b
59 Ordo gestorum of the Council of Chalcedon 451 78v–89v 54
60 Damasus I „Per ipsum filium“ (J3 557) 89v–90r 55a
61 Rome 378 90r–91r 55b
62 Milan 451 – synodal letter „Reversis Domino“ 91r–92r 56
63 Arles 451 – synodal letter „Perlata ad nos“ 92r–93v 57
64 Gelasius I “Necessaria rerum” (J3 1270) 93v–98r 58
65 Antioch 328 (Isidoriana) 98r–101v 59 X
66 Telepte 418 102r–103r 62
67 Regula formatarum 103r–v 63
68 Laodicea 325/82 (Isidoriana) 103v–105v [60] X
69 Constantinople 381 (Isidoriana) 105v–106r [61] X
70a Carthage 419 – protocol of 25 May 106r–108r X
70b Carthage 419 – Nicene creed (Caeciliani) 108r X
70c Carthage 419 – canons of Nicaea (Caeciliani) 108r–110v X
70d Carthage 419 – canons of 25 May 110v–113v X
70e Carthage 419 – subscriptions of 25 May 113v–114r X
70f Carthage 419 – synodal letter „Quoniam Domino“ 114r–115v X
71 Clement I „Notum tibi facio“ (J3 †26) 116r–120r 64
72 Ceretius, Salonius, Veranus „Recensita epistola“ 120r–v 65
73 Cyril of Alexandria „Comperi quosdam“ 120v–122r 66
74 Leo I „Promisisse me“ (J3 1092) – with appendix 122r–129r 67
75 Leo I „Acceptis dilectionis tuae“ (J3 1041) 129r–130r 68
76 Leo I „Lectis dilectionis tuae“ (J3 934) 130r–133v 69
77 Leo I „Sollicitudinis quidem tuae“ (J3 1017) 134r–v 70
78 Leo I „Quam laudabiliter pro“ (J3 919) 134v–139v 71
79 Leo I „Epistolas fraternitatis“ (J3 1098) 139v–142r 72
80 Leo I „Quanta fraternitati“ (J3 918) 142r–144v 73
81 Leo I „Regressus ad nos“ (J3 1086) 144v–145v 74
82 Leo I „Lectis fraternitatis“ (J3 924) 145v–146r 75
83 Leo I „Ut nobis gratulationem“ (J3 903) 146r–147r 76
84 Leo I „In consortium vos“ (J3 908) 147r–v 77
85 Leo I „Divinis praeceptis“ (J3 922) 147v–149v 78
86 Leo I „Quantum praesidii“ (J3 936) 150r–151r 79
87 Leo I „Licet de his“ (J3 967) 151r–152v 80
88 Leo I „Sollicitudini meae quam“ (J3 1035) 152v–155v 81
89 Leo I „Relatione sancti fratris“ (J3 897) 155v–156r 82
90 Leo I „Lectis fraternitatis“ (J3 898) 156r–v 83
91 Leo I „Cum de ordinationibus“ (J3 916) 156v–158v 84
92 Leo I „Religiosa clementissimi“ (J3 938) 158v–159r 85
93 Leo I „Litteris clementiae“ (J3 954) 159r–160r 86
94 Leo I „Si epistolae quae“ (J3 955) 160r–v 87
95 Leo I „Licet per nostros“ (J3 940) 160v–162r 88
96 Leo I „Quantum rebus“ (J3 935) 162r 89
97 Leo I „Magno munere“ (J3 1013) 162r–163v 90
98 Leo I „Manifestato sicut“ (J3 1015) 163v–164v 91
99 Leo I „Omnem quidem“ (J3 1024) 164v–165r 92
100 Leo I „Diligentiam necessariae“ (J3 1081) 165r–v 93
101 Leo I „Multo gaudio mens“ (J3 1089) 165v–167r 94
102 Leo I „Lectis dilectionis“ (J3 1091) 167r–v 95
103 Leo I „Si firmo incommutabilique“ (J3 1048) 167v–168r 96
104 Leo I „Optaverem quidem“ (J3 1000) 168r–v 97
105 Leo I „Iudicium nostrum quod“ (J3 925) 168v–169v 98
106 Isidor of Seville „Veniente ad nos“ 170r–171r

Note that Maassen, Geschichte p. 12 suggests that the Nicaean canons at the beginning were not part of the Quesnelliana proper but an addition („vor der Quesnel’schen Sammlung“) peculiar to the Vienna copy, just like the 419 canons (ibidem p. 9).

Literature

Maassen, Geschichte p. 12; CLA 10, no. 1505, p. 20 and p. 49; CLA Suppl. p. 66; Kéry, p. 28; Mordek, Kirchenrecht und Reform p. 10 including n. 38