Metz, BM, 100: Difference between revisions
m added category |
added CGM |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ Infobox manuscript | {{Infobox manuscript | ||
| library = Metz, BM | | library = Metz, BM | ||
| shelfmark = 100 | | shelfmark = 100 | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
The online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr]) describes it as follows: | The online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr]) describes it as follows: | ||
: | :Collectio canonum vetustissima, jubente b. Anselmo, archiepiscopo cantuariensi, compilata [...] Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit". | ||
This description seems to confuse the ''Anselmo dedicata'' both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the ''Anselmo dedicata'' have used the Metz manuscript ({{author|Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier}}) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other ''Anselmiana''. | This description seems to confuse the ''Anselmo dedicata'' both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the ''Anselmo dedicata'' have used the Metz manuscript ({{author|Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier}}) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other ''Anselmiana''. See already the 849 catalogue 8CGM 5 pp. [https://archive.org/details/catalogue05fran/page/n143/mode/1up CXXXVI]-CXXXVII. | ||
Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. {{author|Dobschütz}}). | Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. {{author|Dobschütz}}). | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
[[Category:Manuscript]] | [[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Correction to Clavis handbook]] | [[Category:Correction to Clavis handbook]] | ||
[[Category:Lost Manuscript]] | [[Category:Lost Manuscript]] | ||
| Line 27: | Line 26: | ||
[[Category:Manuscript of DE]] | [[Category:Manuscript of DE]] | ||
[[Category:Manuscript saec XII]] | [[Category:Manuscript saec XII]] | ||
[[Category:Erroneous reference]] | |||
Latest revision as of 08:56, 6 March 2026
| Library | Metz, BM |
|---|---|
| Shelfmark | 100 |
| Century | saec. XII |
| Provenance | ? |
| European region of origin | unknown <-- manuscript cannot at present be categorized in one of our regions according to Categories for manuscripts by region. --> |
| Collection | Collectio Anselmo dedicata |
| Author | Lotte Kéry |
Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the Collectio Anselmo dedicata lost and likely destroyed in 1944.
The online description (https://bm.metz.fr) describes it as follows:
- Collectio canonum vetustissima, jubente b. Anselmo, archiepiscopo cantuariensi, compilata [...] Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit".
This description seems to confuse the Anselmo dedicata both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the Anselmo dedicata have used the Metz manuscript (Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other Anselmiana. See already the 849 catalogue 8CGM 5 pp. CXXXVI-CXXXVII.
Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. Dobschütz).
See Kéry, Collections p. 125. Note that the entry "Metz, Biblioteca civica, lat. 100" in Clavis handbook p. 273 refers to this manuscript.
