Metz, BM, 100: Difference between revisions
Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
Bot: Infobox formatiert und Parameter sortiert |
m added category |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the ''[[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]]'' lost and likely destroyed in 1944. | Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the ''[[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]]'' lost and likely destroyed in 1944. | ||
The online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr]) describes it as follows: | |||
:"Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit". | |||
This description seems to confuse the ''Anselmo dedicata'' both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the ''Anselmo dedicata'' have used the Metz manuscript ({{author|Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier}}) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other ''Anselmiana''. | |||
Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. {{author|Dobschütz}}). | Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. {{author|Dobschütz}}). | ||
| Line 19: | Line 21: | ||
[[Category:Manuscript]] | [[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Erroneous reference]] | |||
[[Category:Correction to Clavis handbook]] | [[Category:Correction to Clavis handbook]] | ||
[[Category:Lost Manuscript]] | [[Category:Lost Manuscript]] | ||
Revision as of 08:45, 6 March 2026
| Library | Metz, BM |
|---|---|
| Shelfmark | 100 |
| Century | saec. XII |
| Provenance | ? |
| European region of origin | unknown <-- manuscript cannot at present be categorized in one of our regions according to Categories for manuscripts by region. --> |
| Collection | Collectio Anselmo dedicata |
| Author | Lotte Kéry |
Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the Collectio Anselmo dedicata lost and likely destroyed in 1944.
The online description (https://bm.metz.fr) describes it as follows:
- "Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit".
This description seems to confuse the Anselmo dedicata both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the Anselmo dedicata have used the Metz manuscript (Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other Anselmiana.
Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. Dobschütz).
See Kéry, Collections p. 125. Note that the entry "Metz, Biblioteca civica, lat. 100" in Clavis handbook p. 273 refers to this manuscript.
