Hildesheim Excerpts: Difference between revisions
From Clavis Canonum
m (Text replacement - "Category:Collection saec XI" to "Category:Collection saec XI * Collection Category:Collection") |
m (Text replacement - "Herzog-August-Bibliothek" to "HAB") |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
[[Wolfenbüttel, | [[Wolfenbüttel, HAB, Cod. Guelf. 32 Helmst.]], a copy of [[Regino of Prüm, Libri duo de synodalibus causis et disciplinis ecclesiasticis|Regino's Libri duo]] contains a small canonical collection, the "Hildesheim Excerpts". | ||
The collection was first described by Hoffmann/Pokorny 1991, 115-129 ("Die Hildesheimer Auszüge"). According to them, it was created in several steps at Hildesheim in the first half of the eleventh century in the context of the Gandesheim Controversy. At least six formal source were used, including the [[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]] and [[Burchard of Worms, Liber decretorum|Burchard's Liber decretorum]]. | The collection was first described by Hoffmann/Pokorny 1991, 115-129 ("Die Hildesheimer Auszüge"). According to them, it was created in several steps at Hildesheim in the first half of the eleventh century in the context of the Gandesheim Controversy. At least six formal source were used, including the [[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]] and [[Burchard of Worms, Liber decretorum|Burchard's Liber decretorum]]. | ||
Revision as of 18:08, 5 July 2023
Wolfenbüttel, HAB, Cod. Guelf. 32 Helmst., a copy of Regino's Libri duo contains a small canonical collection, the "Hildesheim Excerpts".
The collection was first described by Hoffmann/Pokorny 1991, 115-129 ("Die Hildesheimer Auszüge"). According to them, it was created in several steps at Hildesheim in the first half of the eleventh century in the context of the Gandesheim Controversy. At least six formal source were used, including the Collectio Anselmo dedicata and Burchard's Liber decretorum.
Categories
- not in Clavis
- very small
- saec. XI * Collection
- Western German (Hildesheim)
- this article is a stub
