Appendix Dacherianae Mettensis: Difference between revisions
→Content, structure, sources: JK numbers |
m Text replacement - "Category:Manuscript" to "Category:Manuscript Category:Latin Manuscript" Tag: Reverted |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{DISPLAYTITLE:''Appendix Dacherianae Mettensis''}} | {{DISPLAYTITLE:''Appendix Dacherianae Mettensis''}} | ||
{{Infobox collection|title=Appendix Dacherianae Mettensis|author1=[[User:Christof Rolker|Christof | {{Infobox collection|title=Appendix Dacherianae Mettensis|author1=[[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolke[[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]|century=saec. IX|normregion=|wikidata=|mss=some (2 to 9)}} | |||
== Transmission == | == Transmission == | ||
The collection of 52 canons was extant in five manuscripts, three copies of the ''[[Collectio | The collection of 52 canons was extant in five manuscripts, three copies of the ''[[Collectio Dacherian[[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]'' (all saec. IX, all lost) plus [[Milano, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, A. 46 inf.]] (saec. IX) and [[Köln, Dombibliothek, Cod. 124]]. | |||
The three lost copies are | The three lost copies are | ||
| Line 15: | Line 17: | ||
== Content, structure, sources == | == Content, structure, sources == | ||
{{Author|Seckel}}, working with [[Metz, BM, 236]], divided the material as follows:<blockquote>Die Appendix Dacherianae Mettensis setzt sich aus 52 in der Hs. nicht numerierten Kapiteln zusammen. Sachrubriken finden sich nur bei c. 1. 23. 30. 38. Die Kapitel sind mit Inskriptionen versehen, ausgenommen c. 6. 7. 12. 13. 19. 20. 43. 44. (50.) 51. 52.<br>Die Appendix geht mittelbar oder unmittelbar auf fünf größere Quellengruppen zurück: 1. Konzilien der Merowingerzeit (cc. 1-7); 2. ein Opusculum Hincmari Remensis (cc. 8-12<sup>3</sup>); 3. Dekretalen (cc. 21-29); 4. Sirmondische Konstitutionen (cc. 46-48) und zwar const. 1. 3. 17 ohne den Kommentar des Florus von Lyon;<sup>4</sup> endlich 5. Benedictus Levita.<br>Die 27 Stellen aus Ben. Lev. stehen nicht ungetrennt beieinander; sie sind vielmehr auf drei kleinere Massen verteilt (c. 14-20; 30-45; 49-52). Ich teile die 27 Stellen in Form einer Analyse unter Beibehaltung der handschriftlichen Rubriken und Inskriptionen mit. (Masse I, Bl. 124a bis 126b).</blockquote> | {{Author|Seckel}}, working with [[Metz, BM, 236]], divided the material as follows:<blockquote>Die Appendix Dacherianae Mettensis setzt sich aus 52 in der Hs. nicht numerierten Kapiteln zusammen. Sachrubriken finden sich nur bei c. 1. 23. 30. 38. Die Kapitel sind mit Inskriptionen versehen, ausgenommen c. 6. 7. 12. 13. 19. 20. 43. 44. (50.) 51. 52.<br>Die Appendix geht mittelbar oder unmittelbar auf fünf größere Quellengruppen zurück: 1. Konzilien der Merowingerzeit (cc. 1-7); 2. ein Opusculum Hincmari Remensis (cc. 8-12<sup>3</sup>); 3. Dekretalen (cc. 21-29); 4. Sirmondische Konstitutionen (cc. 46-48) und zwar const. 1. 3. 17 ohne den Kommentar des Florus von Lyon;<sup>4</sup> endlich 5. Benedictus Levita.<br>Die 27 Stellen aus Ben. Lev. stehen nicht ungetrennt beieinander; sie sind vielmehr auf drei kleinere Massen verteilt (c. 14-20; 30-45; 49-52). Ich teile die 27 Stellen in Form einer Analyse unter Beibehaltung der handschriftlichen Rubriken und Inskriptionen mit. (Masse I, Bl. 124a bis 126b).</blockquote> | ||
{{author|Schmitz}}, working with all known witnesses (and {{author|Seckel}}'s unpublished notes on the now lost Metz manuscript) pointed out that c. 8 was the ''[[Collectio de | {{author|Schmitz}}, working with all known witnesses (and {{author|Seckel}}'s unpublished notes on the now lost Metz manuscript) pointed out that c. 8 was the ''[[Collectio de raptoribu[[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]'' compiled by Hincmar of Reims, which in the ''Appendix'' manuscripts was found in the very form that Hincmar of Laon used it (cf. [[Collectio canonum IV in Berlin, SBPK, Phill. 1764|''Collectio IV'' in Berlin, SBPK, Phill. 1764]]). | |||
The nine decretals in cc. 21-29 of the ''Appendix'' are six from the [[False | The nine decretals in cc. 21-29 of the ''Appendix'' are six from the [[False Decretal[[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]] and three genuine ones, namely Gelasius' {{JK|632}}, Leo's {{JK|402}}, and Symmachus' {{JK|754}}. The latter in exactely the version Hincmar of Laon cited in his ''Rotola prolixa'' and Phill. 1764 (quite different from the ''[[Collectio Arelatensis|Arelatensi[[Category:Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]'' version). Here and elsewhere, {{author|Schmitz}} demonstrated, the ''Appendix'' preserves the material Hincmar of Laon was working with, including all four excerpts from Benedictus Levita in Hincmar's ''Rotula''. Some of the material may also represent (genuine) law texts Hincmar compiled because the same sources were used in the (forged) materials he was working with. | |||
For Roman law, the ''Appendix'' was using the collection of Florus of Lyon extant in [[Milano, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, A. 46 inf.]]. | For Roman law, the ''Appendix'' was using the collection of Florus of Lyon extant in [[Milano, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, A. 46 inf.]]. | ||
==Literature== | ==Literature== | ||
{{Author|Seckel}}, [https://www.benedictus.mgh.de/studien/seckel/decurtatus-text.htm Handschriften der falschen | {{Author|Seckel}}, [https://www.benedictus.mgh.de/studien/seckel/decurtatus-text.htm Handschriften der falschen Kapitularie[[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]].- {{author|Zechiel-Eckes}}, [https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/fr/article/view/59681/53448 Florus' Polemik gegen Modoi[[Category:Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]].- {{author|Schmitz}}, [http://www.benedictus.mgh.de/studien/schmitz/AppDach01.pdf Appendix Dacherianae Mettensi[[Category:Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]] (with an edition pp. 171-205). | |||
[[Category:Canonical | [[Category:Canonical Collectio[[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Pre-Gratian | [[Category:Latin Manuscript]]] | ||
[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal | [[Category:Pre-Gratian Collectio[[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:very small (less than 100 canons) | [[Category:Latin Manuscript]]] | ||
[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal letter[[Category:Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]] | |||
[[Category:very small (less than 100 canons) collectio[[Category:Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]] | |||
[[Category:Collection saec IX]] | [[Category:Collection saec IX]] | ||
[[Category:Stub]] | [[Category:Stub]] | ||
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis | [[Category:Collection not in Clavis databas[[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Collection not in | [[Category:Latin Manuscript]]] | ||
[[Category:Collection not in Ker[[Category:Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]] | |||
Revision as of 09:34, 10 December 2025
{{Infobox collection|title=Appendix Dacherianae Mettensis|author1=[[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolke]|century=saec. IX|normregion=|wikidata=|mss=some (2 to 9)}}
Transmission
The collection of 52 canons was extant in five manuscripts, three copies of the [[Collectio Dacherian] (all saec. IX, all lost) plus Milano, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, A. 46 inf. (saec. IX) and Köln, Dombibliothek, Cod. 124.
The three lost copies are
- the exemplar of Barcelona, ACA, Ripoll 77,
Content, structure, sources
Seckel, working with Metz, BM, 236, divided the material as follows:
Die Appendix Dacherianae Mettensis setzt sich aus 52 in der Hs. nicht numerierten Kapiteln zusammen. Sachrubriken finden sich nur bei c. 1. 23. 30. 38. Die Kapitel sind mit Inskriptionen versehen, ausgenommen c. 6. 7. 12. 13. 19. 20. 43. 44. (50.) 51. 52.
Die Appendix geht mittelbar oder unmittelbar auf fünf größere Quellengruppen zurück: 1. Konzilien der Merowingerzeit (cc. 1-7); 2. ein Opusculum Hincmari Remensis (cc. 8-123); 3. Dekretalen (cc. 21-29); 4. Sirmondische Konstitutionen (cc. 46-48) und zwar const. 1. 3. 17 ohne den Kommentar des Florus von Lyon;4 endlich 5. Benedictus Levita.
Die 27 Stellen aus Ben. Lev. stehen nicht ungetrennt beieinander; sie sind vielmehr auf drei kleinere Massen verteilt (c. 14-20; 30-45; 49-52). Ich teile die 27 Stellen in Form einer Analyse unter Beibehaltung der handschriftlichen Rubriken und Inskriptionen mit. (Masse I, Bl. 124a bis 126b).
Schmitz, working with all known witnesses (and Seckel's unpublished notes on the now lost Metz manuscript) pointed out that c. 8 was the [[Collectio de raptoribu] compiled by Hincmar of Reims, which in the Appendix manuscripts was found in the very form that Hincmar of Laon used it (cf. Collectio IV in Berlin, SBPK, Phill. 1764).
The nine decretals in cc. 21-29 of the Appendix are six from the [[False Decretal] and three genuine ones, namely Gelasius' JK 632, Leo's JK 402, and Symmachus' JK 754. The latter in exactely the version Hincmar of Laon cited in his Rotola prolixa and Phill. 1764 (quite different from the [[Collectio Arelatensis|Arelatensi] version). Here and elsewhere, Schmitz demonstrated, the Appendix preserves the material Hincmar of Laon was working with, including all four excerpts from Benedictus Levita in Hincmar's Rotula. Some of the material may also represent (genuine) law texts Hincmar compiled because the same sources were used in the (forged) materials he was working with.
For Roman law, the Appendix was using the collection of Florus of Lyon extant in Milano, Biblioteca Ambrosiana, A. 46 inf..
Literature
Seckel, [https://www.benedictus.mgh.de/studien/seckel/decurtatus-text.htm Handschriften der falschen Kapitularie.- Zechiel-Eckes, [https://journals.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/index.php/fr/article/view/59681/53448 Florus' Polemik gegen Modoi.- Schmitz, [http://www.benedictus.mgh.de/studien/schmitz/AppDach01.pdf Appendix Dacherianae Mettensi (with an edition pp. 171-205).
[[Category:Canonical Collectio] [[Category:Pre-Gratian Collectio] [[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal letter] [[Category:very small (less than 100 canons) collectio] [[Category:Collection not in Clavis databas] [[Category:Collection not in Ker]
