Metz, BM, 100: Difference between revisions
Bot: Infobox formatiert und Parameter sortiert |
m Text replacement - "manuscript cannot at present be categorized in one of our regions according to Categories for manuscripts by region" to "Not at present in one of our Categories for manuscripts by region" |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| shelfmark = 100 | | shelfmark = 100 | ||
| century = saec. XII | | century = saec. XII | ||
| normregion = unknown <-- | | normregion = unknown <-- Not at present in one of our [[Categories for manuscripts by region]]. --> | ||
| coll = Collectio Anselmo dedicata | | coll = Collectio Anselmo dedicata | ||
| author1 = [[User:Lotte Kéry|Lotte Kéry]] | | author1 = [[User:Lotte Kéry|Lotte Kéry]] | ||
Revision as of 21:53, 26 March 2026
| Library | Metz, BM |
|---|---|
| Shelfmark | 100 |
| Century | saec. XII |
| Provenance | ? |
| European region of origin | unknown <-- Not at present in one of our Categories for manuscripts by region. --> |
| Collection | Collectio Anselmo dedicata |
| Author | Lotte Kéry |
Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the Collectio Anselmo dedicata lost and likely destroyed in 1944.
The online description (https://bm.metz.fr) describes it as follows:
- Collectio canonum vetustissima, jubente b. Anselmo, archiepiscopo cantuariensi, compilata [...] Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit".
This description seems to confuse the Anselmo dedicata both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the Anselmo dedicata have used the Metz manuscript (Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other Anselmiana. See already the 849 catalogue 8CGM 5 pp. CXXXVI-CXXXVII.
Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. Dobschütz).
See Kéry, Collections p. 125. Note that the entry "Metz, Biblioteca civica, lat. 100" in Clavis handbook p. 273 refers to this manuscript.
