Excerptiones de gestis Chalcedonensis concilii: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
(Created article based on zechiel-eckes and harder)
 
m (Text replacement - "Category:Collection]]" to "Category:Canonical Collection]]")
 
(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The Excerptiones de gestis Chalcedonensis concilii are a highly selective and artly interpolated abbreviation of the acts of the Council of Chalcedon. They are attributed to Verecundus in the manuscripts, but as {{author|Zechiel-Eckes}} has argued convincingly, were produced in the ninth century by the Pseudoisidorian forgers.
The ''Excerptiones de gestis Chalcedonensis concilii'' are a highly selective, interpolated abbreviation of the ''versio Rustici'' of the acts of the Council of Chalcedon. They were attributed to Verecundus in the ''editio princeps'', but as {{author|Zechiel-Eckes}} has argued convincingly, in fact were produced in the ninth century by the Pseudoisidorian forgers. Strikingly, the copy of the ''versio Rustici'' in [[Paris, BnF, lat. 11611]] (saec. IX 1/4, Corbie) contains notes corresponding in many cases to the ''Excerptiones'', and Zechiel-Eckes concluded that it was nothing less than Pseudoisidore‘s ''Arbeitshandschrift''.


{{author|Zechiel-Eckes}}, Verecundus oder Pseudoisidor? Zur Genese der Excerptiones de gestis Chalcedonensis concilii, DA 56 (2000) pp. 413-446 http://www.digizeitschriften.de/main/dms/img/?PPN=PPN345858735_0056&DMDID=dmdlog40. - {{authr|Harder}}, Pseudoisidor pp. 173-180.
Compared to its source, the ''Excerptiones'' exaggerate the role of the pope (and papal legates) in convening synods, downplay imperial prerogatives, and generally ignore the theological points at issue.


[[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries]]  
Many of the 34 known manuscripts are copies of the False Decretals, including [[Città del Vaticano, BAV, Vat. lat. 630|Vat. Lat. 630]] and [[New Haven, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, 442]].
[[Category:Collection from Northern France]]  
 
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]  
{{author|Zechiel-Eckes}}, Verecundus oder Pseudoisidor? Zur Genese der Excerptiones de gestis Chalcedonensis concilii, DA 56 (2000) pp. 413-446 http://www.digizeitschriften.de/main/dms/img/?PPN=PPN345858735_0056&DMDID=dmdlog40. - {{author|Harder}}, Pseudoisidor pp. 173-180.
[[Category:Collection]]
[[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries]]
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]4
[[Category:Collection from Northern France]]
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]
[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]

Latest revision as of 00:35, 9 August 2024

The Excerptiones de gestis Chalcedonensis concilii are a highly selective, interpolated abbreviation of the versio Rustici of the acts of the Council of Chalcedon. They were attributed to Verecundus in the editio princeps, but as Zechiel-Eckes has argued convincingly, in fact were produced in the ninth century by the Pseudoisidorian forgers. Strikingly, the copy of the versio Rustici in Paris, BnF, lat. 11611 (saec. IX 1/4, Corbie) contains notes corresponding in many cases to the Excerptiones, and Zechiel-Eckes concluded that it was nothing less than Pseudoisidore‘s Arbeitshandschrift.

Compared to its source, the Excerptiones exaggerate the role of the pope (and papal legates) in convening synods, downplay imperial prerogatives, and generally ignore the theological points at issue.

Many of the 34 known manuscripts are copies of the False Decretals, including Vat. Lat. 630 and New Haven, Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, 442.

Zechiel-Eckes, Verecundus oder Pseudoisidor? Zur Genese der Excerptiones de gestis Chalcedonensis concilii, DA 56 (2000) pp. 413-446 http://www.digizeitschriften.de/main/dms/img/?PPN=PPN345858735_0056&DMDID=dmdlog40. - Harder, Pseudoisidor pp. 173-180.