Alençon, BM, 135: Difference between revisions
(Redirected page to Alencon, BM, 135) Tag: New redirect |
mNo edit summary |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Alençon, Bibliothèque municipale, 135 contains the first version of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]''. It is manuscript '''A''' in the {{author|Brett/Nowak}} edition. | |||
The manuscript from St Evroul was written saec. XII 1/2 in long lines. In part related to [[Berlin, SBPK, Hamilton 345]] (= '''H''') and [[Paris, BnF, lat. 4282]] (= '''Q''') – it has related dislocations in Tripartita A2.3-4 and A2.26 - but more idiosyncratic. It lacks some of '''HQ'''’s peculiarities and frequently agrees with '''T''' (= [[København, Kongelike Bibliotek, Thott 555 4°]]) or '''O''' (= [[Oxford, Bodleian Library, D’Orville 46]]) against them, though '''O''' has often been altered later. The scribe frequently confuses 's' and 'x' or breaks off in mid-word. | |||
The manuscript is not digitized, only parts of fol. 1 and fol. 12r are: https://bvmm.irht.cnrs.fr/consult/consult.php?reproductionId=11789 | |||
== Literature == | |||
{{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|244}} | |||
[[Category:Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Manuscript saec XII]] | |||
[[Category:Manuscript partly digitized]] | |||
[[Category:Manuscript of IT]] | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Alençon, BM, 00135}} | |||
[[Category:Manuscript in Alençon, BM]] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:35, 16 November 2024
Alençon, Bibliothèque municipale, 135 contains the first version of the Collectio Tripartita. It is manuscript A in the Brett/Nowak edition.
The manuscript from St Evroul was written saec. XII 1/2 in long lines. In part related to Berlin, SBPK, Hamilton 345 (= H) and Paris, BnF, lat. 4282 (= Q) – it has related dislocations in Tripartita A2.3-4 and A2.26 - but more idiosyncratic. It lacks some of HQ’s peculiarities and frequently agrees with T (= København, Kongelike Bibliotek, Thott 555 4°) or O (= Oxford, Bodleian Library, D’Orville 46) against them, though O has often been altered later. The scribe frequently confuses 's' and 'x' or breaks off in mid-word.
The manuscript is not digitized, only parts of fol. 1 and fol. 12r are: https://bvmm.irht.cnrs.fr/consult/consult.php?reproductionId=11789
Literature
Kéry, Collections p. 244
