Metz, BM, 100: Difference between revisions

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
Created page with "According to the online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr])..."
 
Bot: Infobox formatiert und Parameter sortiert
 
(23 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
According to the online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr]) "Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit". Note, however, that this description seems to confuse the Anselmo dedicata both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury?!?
{{ Infobox manuscript
    | library        = Metz, BM
    | shelfmark      = 100
    | century        = saec. XII
    | normregion    = Not at present in one of our [[Categories for manuscripts by region]]
    | coll          = Collectio Anselmo dedicata
    | author1        = [[User:Lotte Kéry|Lotte Kéry]]
    | libraryqid    = Q2901549
}}


Contained ''[[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]]''  
Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the ''[[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]]'' lost and likely destroyed in 1944.


= Categories =
The online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr]) describes it as follows:
* copy of DE [[Category:Manuscript of DE]]
:Collectio canonum vetustissima, jubente b. Anselmo, archiepiscopo cantuariensi, compilata [...] Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit".
* saec. XII [[Category:Manuscript saec X]]
This description seems to confuse the ''Anselmo dedicata'' both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the ''Anselmo dedicata'' have used the Metz manuscript ({{author|Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier}}) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other ''Anselmiana''. See already the 849 catalogue 8CGM 5 pp. [https://archive.org/details/catalogue05fran/page/n143/mode/1up CXXXVI]-CXXXVII.
 
Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. {{author|Dobschütz}}).
 
See {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|125}}. Note that the entry "Metz, Biblioteca civica, lat. 100" in Clavis handbook p. {{FM|273}} refers to this manuscript.
 
{{DEFAULTSORT:Metz, BM, 00100}}
 
[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Correction to Clavis handbook]]
[[Category:Erroneous reference]]
[[Category:Lost Manuscript]]
[[Category:Manuscript in Metz, BM]]
[[Category:Manuscript of DE]]
[[Category:Manuscript saec XII]]

Latest revision as of 19:36, 12 April 2026

Library Metz, BM
Shelfmark 100
Century saec. XII
Provenance ?
European region of origin Not at present in one of our Categories for manuscripts by region
Collection Collectio Anselmo dedicata
Author Lotte Kéry


Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the Collectio Anselmo dedicata lost and likely destroyed in 1944.

The online description (https://bm.metz.fr) describes it as follows:

Collectio canonum vetustissima, jubente b. Anselmo, archiepiscopo cantuariensi, compilata [...] Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit".

This description seems to confuse the Anselmo dedicata both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the Anselmo dedicata have used the Metz manuscript (Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other Anselmiana. See already the 849 catalogue 8CGM 5 pp. CXXXVI-CXXXVII.

Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. Dobschütz).

See Kéry, Collections p. 125. Note that the entry "Metz, Biblioteca civica, lat. 100" in Clavis handbook p. 273 refers to this manuscript.