München, BSB, Clm 5508
München, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek, Clm 5508 contains two collections: a copy of the Collectio Diessensis followed by the Collectio Frisingensis I (Wirbelauer's "M1"). Fragments of the same codex were found in Clm 5675 and 4 Inc.c.a. 553; they are now preserved as München, BSB, Clm 29550/4 (olim Clm 29085).
Contents
Based on the accounts of Maassen, Mirabile, and BStK Online, Clm 5508 contains:
- fol. 1-130 Collectio Diessensis
- fol. 135-(213?) Collectio Frisingensis I
Note that Maassen, while describing the Diessensis in great detail (pp. 624-636) did not treat Clm 5508 as a copy of the Frisingensis I, which he also described in great detail based on Clm 6243. Maassen further described Clm 6243 and 5508 as containing the Freising fragment and printed it from both manuscripts (Geschichte pp. 921-923), but actually does not provide a folio numbers. According to him, these canons in Clm 5508 were found „auf einem einzelnen Blatt, mitten in die sardicensischen Canonen hineingeheftet, in der Handschrift von Diessen“ (p. 35).
The BStK Online description singles out fols. 20rb-40va as containing „canons“ but does not provide details.
Note that Mirabile seems to suggest that the manuscript had 220 folios, but this seems unlikely.
Wirbelauer describes the Diessensis in Clm 5508 as a Collectio Sanblasiana (but with important qualifications); Maassen, CLA, Kéry, and Hoskin describe it as a Diessensis.
Clm 5508 is said to be a copy of München, BSB, Clm 6243 (Kéry, p. 2), the only other known copy of Frisingensis I.
Links
- For Clm 5508, see the summary description by the BSB (online).
- For a fuller description see BStK Online: https://glossen.germ-ling.uni-bamberg.de/bstk/496 (retrieved and archived 21 June 2024)
- Mirabile: https://www.mirabileweb.it/manuscript/m%C3%BCnchen-bayerische-staatsbibliothek-clm-5508-manoscript/118663
- CLA IX 1247 https://elmss.nuigalway.ie/catalogue/1732
- Wikidata https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q125823182
- note that the description at Manuscripta medievalia (http://www.manuscripta-mediaevalia.de/dokumente/html/obj50006194) is no longer available; the redirect does not work; the new handschriftenportal description is worthless (https://handschriftenportal.de/search?hspobjectid=HSP-67ddec66-033c-3086-a028-8b8bff30380f&q=5508&hl=true)
- Clm 5508 is digitized: http://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb00036890-3, and so are the fragments Clm 29550/4, see https://mdz-nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb00036890-3
- for bibliography see Forschungsdokumentation Handschriften
History of the digitization
Based on the Handschriftencensus, there seem to have been digital images of the b/w microfilm by December 2009 for the latest (see the archived version here). If so, this b/w version was replaced by a colour version at an unknown date, with the same identifiers used for both digital objects. According to the metadata (here) the manuscript was digitized on July 1st 2009. This would fit the idea that there first was a digital copy of the microfilm, as the MDZ assigns a "July 1st" date to all digitized microfilms. According to the URN resolver of the, the URN urn:nbn:de:bvb:12-bsb00036890-3 was created 2009-04-21 and changed 2021-09-24, which would fit a b/w digitization made in 2009 later replaced by a colour version. However, the Europeana Regia homepage claims that Clm 5508 was digitzed 2012-07-05: http://www.europeanaregia.eu/node/11272. The BSB is aware that their metadata is unreliable and claims to have no record of the microfilm having been digitized.
Literature
Maassen, Geschichte pp. 624-636 and 921-923.
