München, BSB, Clm 4592
Library | [[München, BSB]] |
---|---|
Shelfmark | Clm 4592 |
Century | s. IX2/4-XIII1 |
General region of origin | Italy, Salzburg, and Southeastern Germany |
Collection | Collectio CCL capitulorum |
Collection 2 | Collectio CCCC capitulorum |
Collection 3 | Collectio XXX capitulorum (De ratione matrimonii) |
Main author | Bruno Schalekamp |
Main author | Sven Meeder |
München, Bayerische Staatsbiliothek, Clm 4592 is a middle ninth to early thirteenth-century manuscript of 209 folios in three parts. Part I: fols. 1r-75v; part II: 76r-118r; part III: 120r-207v. It was compiled in 1 col. (fols. Iv, 1r-75v, 119v-157v, and 161r-207v) and in 2 cols. (fols. 76ra-118rb, 119ra-vb, and 158ra-161rb), with the following dimensions: I: 185-190 x 85-90 mm in 32-40 lines; II: 180-185 x 100-105 mm in 48-50 lines; III: 190 x 115 mm in 24 lines (235-240 x 160 mm). Its codicological composition reads as follows: 28 quires of which parts I-II were added at a later stage: (V – 1)8 + 2 x (V – 2)24 + 3 x IV47 + (V – 2)54 + (V – 1)63 + (IV – 1)70 + (III – 1)75 + 4 x IV107 + V117 + I119 + (III – 3)122 + (IV – 1)129 + (V – 2)137 + IV145 + (V – 2)153 + 2 x (IV – 2)165 + (VI – 3)174 + V184 + IV192 + (IV – 1)199 + IV207; quire signatures in Roman numerals start at I122 until XII207, foliation in Arabic numerals from the nineteenth century in lead pencil.
Part I was written by one main hand with various later additions by different hands in the margins in late Caroline minuscule; part II was written in three to four hands in Gothic textura; part III was written in one hand in Caroline minuscule. According to Glauche, parts I-II originate from saec. XIIex and XIII1 respectively. Part III was penned in saec. IX2/4 according to Glauche, Kéry, and Mordek. The origins of part I can be traced to central Italy, while II is unknown or possibly from Salzburg according to Glauche. Part III's origins are more clear, according to both Kéry and Mordek, tracing it back to Southeastern Germany, Benediktbeuern. According to Bischoff, the three parts were probably bound together in Salzburg, where the manuscript has remained since, and thus pointing to its provenance.
Contents
The codex is a large-sized codex consisting of almost exclusively legislative and canonical material. The former is dominated by Justinian's Corpus Iuris Civilis and Bernard of Pavia's Summa decretalium, the latter by the Collectio CCL capitulorum and Collectio CCCC capitulorum. A few chapters of the Collectio XXX capitulorum (De ratione matrimonii) were incorporated in the former collection. A small excerpt of Bede's De ratione temporum glues both canonical collections together.
Not much else is known about the manuscript, as I did not have complete digital nor physical access to this manuscript. Most of this description is a reconstruction in concordance with other previous descriptions, catalogues, and academic works.
folios | texts |
---|---|
Front cover and paper flyleaf | |
Ir | Note of ownership in an eighteenth-century hand |
Iv | Short table of contents in a fifteenth-century hand |
1r-75v | Justinian I's Corpus Iuris Civilis, Institutes |
76ra-118rb | Bernardus Papiensis's Summa decretalium |
118v-119v | Blank pages |
120ra-157v | Collectio CCL capitulorum, including: |
140v-142v: Collectio XXX capitulorum (De ratione matrimonii), taken up into collection and untitled | |
157v-158r | Short excerpt of Bede's De ratione temporum, chapter 66 |
158r-207v | Collectio CCCC capitulorum |
Back cover |
Literature
Bischoff, Schreibschulen Vol. 1 (1960), p. 46; Bischoff, Schreibschulen Vol. 2 (1980), p. 159; Glauche, Katalog der lateinischen Handschriften (1993), p. 146-151; Kéry, Canonical Collections (1999), p. 75, 83, and 163; Meeder, 'Biblical past and canonical present: the case of the Collectio 400 capitulorum'; Mordek, Kirchenrecht und Reform (1975), p. 258-259.
The edition of the Collectio CCCC capitulorum by Sven Meeder will soon be in print. Furthermore, an edition of the Collectio XXX capitulorum (De ratione matrimonii) is currently being prepared by Sven Meeder, Gideon de Jong, and Bruno Schalekamp.