Pseudoisidore, False Decretals: Difference between revisions
(preparing to split the article) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
== Versions == | == Versions == | ||
Since Hinschius' | Since Hinschius' edition, scholarship refers to six versions of the forgeries which emerged very early in the tradition of the False Decretals: | ||
* A1, on which see [[Pseudoisidore A1]] | |||
* A2, on which see [[Pseudoisidore A2]] | |||
* | * A/B, on which see [[Pseudoisidore AB]] | ||
* B, on which see [[Pseudoisidore B]] | |||
* C, on which see [[Pseudoisidore C]] | |||
* Cluny version, on which see [[Pseudoisidore Cluny]] | |||
* | |||
* | Versions A1, A/B, B and C contain all three major parts (decretals, councils, decretals). The A2 version contains only decretals; it contains the complete first decretal part but only part of the second (ending with some, not all, of the letters of Damasus). | ||
* | |||
== Manuscripts == | == Manuscripts == | ||
According to Fuhrmann, there are "at least" 115 manuscripts, not counting excerpts. 80 copies are listed in Schafer-Williams' guide. | According to Fuhrmann, there are "at least" 115 manuscripts, not counting excerpts. 80 copies are listed in Schafer-Williams' guide. For details, see the articles on the individual versions of the False Decretals. | ||
== The False Decretals in the Database == | == The False Decretals in the Database == | ||
The present analysis ({{Coll|IS}}) includes only the forged decretals from Clement to Damasus. These decretals have the original rubrics of the forgers. The Clavis databse entries are based on the edition of Paul {{author|Hinschius}}, Decretales Pseudo-Isidorianae (Leipzig 1863); [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/view/bsb10801053 online]. | The present analysis ({{Coll|IS}}) includes only the forged decretals from Clement to Damasus in A1 version. These decretals have the original rubrics of the forgers. The Clavis databse entries are based on the edition of Paul {{author|Hinschius}}, Decretales Pseudo-Isidorianae (Leipzig 1863); [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/de/view/bsb10801053 online]. | ||
== Editions (Past and Future) == | == Editions (Past and Future) == | ||
| Line 38: | Line 28: | ||
== Literature == | == Literature == | ||
{{author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|100}}; {{author|Fuhrmann}} in {{author|Fuhrmann/Jasper}} pp. {{JasperFuhrmann|137}}-195. | {{author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|100}}; {{author|Fuhrmann}} in {{author|Fuhrmann/Jasper}} pp. {{JasperFuhrmann|137}}-195. | ||
Revision as of 15:20, 1 August 2024
The False Decretals (IS) are the most famous part of the Pseudo-Isidorian forgeries. Despite its name, the collection is actually a combination of decretals and conciliar canons, mixing genuine, forged, and interpolated materials. The material is largely arranged chronologically.
Versions
Since Hinschius' edition, scholarship refers to six versions of the forgeries which emerged very early in the tradition of the False Decretals:
- A1, on which see Pseudoisidore A1
- A2, on which see Pseudoisidore A2
- A/B, on which see Pseudoisidore AB
- B, on which see Pseudoisidore B
- C, on which see Pseudoisidore C
- Cluny version, on which see Pseudoisidore Cluny
Versions A1, A/B, B and C contain all three major parts (decretals, councils, decretals). The A2 version contains only decretals; it contains the complete first decretal part but only part of the second (ending with some, not all, of the letters of Damasus).
Manuscripts
According to Fuhrmann, there are "at least" 115 manuscripts, not counting excerpts. 80 copies are listed in Schafer-Williams' guide. For details, see the articles on the individual versions of the False Decretals.
The False Decretals in the Database
The present analysis (IS) includes only the forged decretals from Clement to Damasus in A1 version. These decretals have the original rubrics of the forgers. The Clavis databse entries are based on the edition of Paul Hinschius, Decretales Pseudo-Isidorianae (Leipzig 1863); online.
Editions (Past and Future)
The False Decretals are commonly cited from Hinschius' edition, the shortcomings of which have often been commented upon. A new (online) edition
- Karl-Georg Schon from 2004 to 2006 published his findings on the MGH homepage: https://www.pseudoisidor.mgh.de
- Eric Knibbs reported on his findings on his blogs
- from 2010 to 2016 https://pseudoisidore.blogspot.com/
- from 2016 to 2020 (no longer online) https://web.archive.org/web/20220417022934/https://pseudo-isidore.com/
Literature
Kéry, Collections p. 100; Fuhrmann in Fuhrmann/Jasper pp. 137-195.
