Talk:Collectio CCCXLII capitulorum: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
Latest comment: 3 November 2023 by SStark
m (Christof Rolker moved page Talk:The Collectio CCCXLII capitulorum to Talk:Collectio CCCXLII capitulorum without leaving a redirect: standardised title)
(Reply)
Tags: Reply Source
 
Line 1: Line 1:
Linda used two mss, and gave both of them sigla in the database. Not sure we have to split the entry, but just in case I've added it to the category "Descriptions that need to be split" .--[[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]] ([[User talk:Christof Rolker|talk]]) 15:30, 17 April 2022 (CEST)
Linda used two mss, and gave both of them sigla in the database. Not sure we have to split the entry, but just in case I've added it to the category "Descriptions that need to be split" .--[[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]] ([[User talk:Christof Rolker|talk]]) 15:30, 17 April 2022 (CEST)
:Which makes this basically exactly the same situation as [[https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Talk:Collectio_Hibernensis#New_entry_for_Hib_(alpha)| Talk:Collectio Hibernensis]]. [[User:SStark|SStark]] ([[User talk:SStark|talk]]) 19:14, 3 November 2023 (CET)

Latest revision as of 20:14, 3 November 2023

Linda used two mss, and gave both of them sigla in the database. Not sure we have to split the entry, but just in case I've added it to the category "Descriptions that need to be split" .--Christof Rolker (talk) 15:30, 17 April 2022 (CEST)Reply[reply]

Which makes this basically exactly the same situation as [Talk:Collectio Hibernensis]. SStark (talk) 19:14, 3 November 2023 (CET)Reply[reply]