Capitula Angilramni: Difference between revisions

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
Tag: Reverted
Reverting ReplaceText change from 2025-12-10 09:30
Tag: Manual revert
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox collection|title=Capitula Angilramni|author1=[[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolke[[Category:Manuscript]]
{{Infobox collection|title=Capitula Angilramni|author1=[[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]]|century=saec. IX|normregion=Northern France|wikidata=Q1034702|mss=many (10 to 99)|key=AO}}
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]|century=saec. IX|normregion=Northern France|wikidata=Q1034702|mss=many (10 to 99)|key=AO}}


The ''Capitula Angilramni'' is a collection belonging to the Pseudoisidorian forgeries compiled in ninth-century Francia. It contains 71 (72) chapters all dealing with criminal accusations against bishops and other clergy. The author is said to be Angilram, bishop of Metz (768–791) and the recipient pope Hadrian I (772–795). The major sources are Roman law in its Visigothic redaction, the ''[[Collectio Dionysio-Hadrian[[Category:Manuscript]]
The ''Capitula Angilramni'' is a collection belonging to the Pseudoisidorian forgeries compiled in ninth-century Francia. It contains 71 (72) chapters all dealing with criminal accusations against bishops and other clergy. The author is said to be Angilram, bishop of Metz (768–791) and the recipient pope Hadrian I (772–795). The major sources are Roman law in its Visigothic redaction, the ''[[Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana]]'' and the ''Historia Tripartita'' of Cassiodorus. The collection is closely related to a further forgery, a [[Benedictus Levita, Collectio capitularium|''Collectio capitularium'' attributed to a certain Benedictus Levita]]. Emil {{author|Seckel}} characterized the relationship between the two works as interwoven (''verfilzt''). Horst {{author|Fuhrmann}} and Gerhard {{author|Schmitz}} agree but reject the implication that they were compiled „parallel nebeneinander“. „Angilram“ used the collection attributed to Benedictus Levita in an early version; the ''Capitula Angilramni'' in an unfinished form was used for the fourth Appendix to the ''Capitula'' of Benedictus Levita. Both of these collections would be major sources for the pseudoisidorian forgers. The ''Capitula Angilramni'' often accompanied the [[False Decretals]]. It was edited by Paul {{author|Hinschius}} together with the forged decretals, and the present analysis ({{Coll|AO}}) is based on that edition. For a new edition, see Capitula Angilramni, ed. {{author|Schon}} (2006).
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]'' and the ''Historia Tripartita'' of Cassiodorus. The collection is closely related to a further forgery, a [[Benedictus Levita, Collectio capitularium|''Collectio capitularium'' attributed to a certain Benedictus Levit[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]. Emil {{author|Seckel}} characterized the relationship between the two works as interwoven (''verfilzt''). Horst {{author|Fuhrmann}} and Gerhard {{author|Schmitz}} agree but reject the implication that they were compiled „parallel nebeneinander“. „Angilram“ used the collection attributed to Benedictus Levita in an early version; the ''Capitula Angilramni'' in an unfinished form was used for the fourth Appendix to the ''Capitula'' of Benedictus Levita. Both of these collections would be major sources for the pseudoisidorian forgers. The ''Capitula Angilramni'' often accompanied the [[False Decretal[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]. It was edited by Paul {{author|Hinschius}} together with the forged decretals, and the present analysis ({{Coll|AO}}) is based on that edition. For a new edition, see Capitula Angilramni, ed. {{author|Schon}} (2006).


[[Category:Canonical Collectio[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]
[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection]]
[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collectio[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal letters]]
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]
[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal letter[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]
[[Category:Collection Key is AO]]
[[Category:Collection Key is AO]]
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]
[[Category:Collection from Northern Franc[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Collection from Northern France]]
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]
[[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries]]
[[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgerie[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Clavis entries based on modern edition]]
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]
[[Category:Clavis entries based on modern editio[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]]

Latest revision as of 16:13, 10 December 2025

Title Capitula Angilramni
Key AO
Wikidata Item no. Q1034702
Century saec. IX
European region of origin Northern France
Author Christof Rolker
No. of manuscripts many (10 to 99)


The Capitula Angilramni is a collection belonging to the Pseudoisidorian forgeries compiled in ninth-century Francia. It contains 71 (72) chapters all dealing with criminal accusations against bishops and other clergy. The author is said to be Angilram, bishop of Metz (768–791) and the recipient pope Hadrian I (772–795). The major sources are Roman law in its Visigothic redaction, the Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana and the Historia Tripartita of Cassiodorus. The collection is closely related to a further forgery, a Collectio capitularium attributed to a certain Benedictus Levita. Emil Seckel characterized the relationship between the two works as interwoven (verfilzt). Horst Fuhrmann and Gerhard Schmitz agree but reject the implication that they were compiled „parallel nebeneinander“. „Angilram“ used the collection attributed to Benedictus Levita in an early version; the Capitula Angilramni in an unfinished form was used for the fourth Appendix to the Capitula of Benedictus Levita. Both of these collections would be major sources for the pseudoisidorian forgers. The Capitula Angilramni often accompanied the False Decretals. It was edited by Paul Hinschius together with the forged decretals, and the present analysis (AO) is based on that edition. For a new edition, see Capitula Angilramni, ed. Schon (2006).