Pseudoisidore C: Difference between revisions
m Text replacement - "X([a-zA-Z]{1,5})ex" to "X$1<sup>ex</sup>" |
m Text replacement - "Praha, Národní knihovna České republiky" to "Praha, Národní knihovna" |
||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* [[Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27 (B.19)]] | * [[Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27 (B.19)]] | ||
* [[Praha, Národní knihovna | * [[Praha, Národní knihovna, IV.B.12]] | ||
==Editions and Literature== | ==Editions and Literature== | ||
Revision as of 16:34, 29 October 2025
The C recension of the False Decretals is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the Pseudoisidore AB. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen Patzold has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.
Contents
The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the A1 recension is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the Collectio Quesnelliana (Knibbs). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to Patzold also include the Collectio Corbeiensis (for one letter), the Collectio Bobbiensis, and the Collectio Grimanica.
Manuscripts
- Reims, BM, 672 (saec. XII)
Editions and Literature
See the main article Pseudoisidore, False Decretals