Pseudoisidore C: Difference between revisions
m (Text replacement - "Category:Article lacking categories" to "Category:Lacks categories") |
m (Text replacement - "Národní Knihovna Ceské Republiky" to "Národní knihovna České republiky") |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
* Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27 | * Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27 | ||
* Praha, Národní | * Praha, Národní knihovna České republiky, IV.B.12 | ||
==Editions and Literature== | ==Editions and Literature== |
Latest revision as of 00:21, 8 October 2024
The C recension of the False Decretals is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the A/B recension. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen Patzold has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.
Contents
The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the A1 recension is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the Quesnelliana (Knibbs). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to Patzold also include the Collectio Corbeiensis (for one letter), the Collectio Bobbiensis, and the Collectio Grimanica.
Manuscripts
- Reims, BM, 672 (saec. XII)
- Montpellier, Bibliothèque Interuniversitaire, H 013
- Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27
- Praha, Národní knihovna České republiky, IV.B.12
Editions and Literature
See the main article Pseudoisidore, False Decretals