Metz, BM, 100: Difference between revisions
From Clavis Canonum
No edit summary |
(updated text and categories) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
According to the online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr]) "Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit". This description seems to confuse the Anselmo dedicata both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the ''Anselmo dedicata'' have used the Metz manuscript (Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other ''Anselmiana''. | According to the online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr]) "Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit". This description seems to confuse the Anselmo dedicata both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the ''Anselmo dedicata'' have used the Metz manuscript (Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other ''Anselmiana''. | ||
Contained ''[[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]]'' | Contained ''[[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]]''. | ||
Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. Dobschütz). | |||
= Categories = | = Categories = | ||
* copy of DE [[Category:Manuscript of DE]] | * copy of DE [[Category:Manuscript of DE]] | ||
* saec. XII [[Category:Manuscript saec | * saec. XII [[Category:Manuscript saec XII]] | ||
* destroyed [[Category:Manuscript no longer extant]] | |||
Revision as of 23:21, 18 February 2023
According to the online description (https://bm.metz.fr) "Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit". This description seems to confuse the Anselmo dedicata both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the Anselmo dedicata have used the Metz manuscript (Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other Anselmiana.
Contained Collectio Anselmo dedicata.
Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. Dobschütz).
Categories
- copy of DE
- saec. XII
- destroyed
