Reims, BM, 673: Difference between revisions

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
added category
m minor additions
Line 11: Line 11:
}}
}}


Reims, BM, 673 (G. 522) is a copy of [[Burchard of Worms, Liber decretorum]], followed by a fragment of another copy (fol. 241-243). The codex was written for Manasse II, who was bishop from 1096 to 1106. It is very similar to [[Reims, BM, 674]].
Reims, BM, 673 (G. 522), fol. 4-240 is a copy of [[Burchard of Worms, Liber decretorum]], supplemented by a fragment of another copy (fol. 1-3 and 241-243). The codex was probably written for Manasse II, who was archbishop from 1096 to 1106. It is very similar to [[Reims, BM, 674]].


The complete Burchard shows none of the most obvious changes commonly found with Italian Burchard copies: BU01.021 is not augmented (fol. 12vb), BU02.023 is not discplaced (fol. 48va), there is no additional text after BU03.015, and the Seligenstadt canons are those of the A version. It does not contain a synodal ordo.
The complete Burchard shows none of the most obvious changes commonly found with Italian Burchard copies: BU01.021 is not augmented (fol. 12vb), BU02.023 is not discplaced (fol. 48va), there is no additional text after BU03.015, and the Seligenstadt canons are those of the A version. It does not contain a synodal ordo.

Revision as of 23:38, 1 March 2025

Library Reims, BM
Shelfmark 673
Century saec. XI/XII
Provenance ?
European region of origin Eastern France
Collection Burchard of Worms, Liber decretorum
Digital Images arca.irht.cnrs.fr (from microfilm)
Description at ccfr.bnf.fr
Description at 2 data.biblissima.fr
Author Christof Rolker


Reims, BM, 673 (G. 522), fol. 4-240 is a copy of Burchard of Worms, Liber decretorum, supplemented by a fragment of another copy (fol. 1-3 and 241-243). The codex was probably written for Manasse II, who was archbishop from 1096 to 1106. It is very similar to Reims, BM, 674.

The complete Burchard shows none of the most obvious changes commonly found with Italian Burchard copies: BU01.021 is not augmented (fol. 12vb), BU02.023 is not discplaced (fol. 48va), there is no additional text after BU03.015, and the Seligenstadt canons are those of the A version. It does not contain a synodal ordo.

Literature

Kéry, Collections pp. 136, 144, 148; Jasper, MGH Conc. 8 p. 23; Rolker, Letters (online) p. 112 n. 143.