Collectio Ashburnhamensis: Difference between revisions
Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
m Text replacement - "Category:Collection]]" to "Category:Canonical Collection]]" |
m Text replacement - "\*[^\n]{0,45}(\[\[Category)" to "$1" |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
| specificregion = Rome | | specificregion = Rome | ||
| title = Collectio Ashburnhamensis | | title = Collectio Ashburnhamensis | ||
| author1 = Fowler-Magerl | | author1 = [[User:Linda Fowler-Magerl|Linda Fowler-Magerl]] | ||
}}The ''Collectio Ashburnhamensis'' is named after the only known manuscript, [[Firenze, | |mss=one}}The ''Collectio Ashburnhamensis'' is named after the only known manuscript, [[Firenze, BML, Ashburnham 1554|Firenze, BML, Ashburnham 1554]] ({{Coll|LM}}). It is related to the [[Collectio canonum I in Paris, BnF, lat. 3858C]] (MY). Linda Fowler-Magerl assumed that both collections have a common formal source, the lost [[The collection behind the Ashburnhamensis and the collection in Paris, BnF, lat. 3858C|intermediate collection she labelled "lm/my"]]. | ||
Like MY, LM begins with series of canons from the 74T and continues with a mixture of canons from the 74T, the 4L and texts also found in the A Aucta form of the collection of Anselm of Lucca. Its canons are divided into titles, but neither titles nor canons are numbered. LM has been described as a collection in two parts because of conciliar decrees which follow the collection, [{{FM|149}}] but neither the conciliar canons nor LM is referred to as ''pars'' or ''liber'' and the conciliar canons are in no way attached to LM. | Like MY, LM begins with series of canons from the 74T and continues with a mixture of canons from the 74T, the 4L and texts also found in the A Aucta form of the collection of Anselm of Lucca. Its canons are divided into titles, but neither titles nor canons are numbered. LM has been described as a collection in two parts because of conciliar decrees which follow the collection, [{{FM|149}}] but neither the conciliar canons nor LM is referred to as ''pars'' or ''liber'' and the conciliar canons are in no way attached to LM. | ||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
The Ashburnham manuscript contains material from northern France not in the Paris manuscript. This testifies to the flow of information [{{FM|150}}] in both directions common in the late 11th century. | The Ashburnham manuscript contains material from northern France not in the Paris manuscript. This testifies to the flow of information [{{FM|150}}] in both directions common in the late 11th century. | ||
== Literature == | ==Literature== | ||
For a more detailed comparison of the two collections see {{Author|Fowler-Magerl}}, The Relationship, pp. 241–260. – {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery|278}}. | For a more detailed comparison of the two collections see {{Author|Fowler-Magerl}}, The Relationship, pp. 241–260. – {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery|278}}. | ||
[[Category:Collection Key is LM]] [[Category:Canonical Collection]] [[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection]] [[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal letters]] | |||
[[Category:Collection belonging to 74T and derivatives]] | |||
[[Category:very small (less than 100 canons) collection]] | |||
[[Category:Collection from Rome]] [[Category:Collection from Central Italy]] | |||
[[Category:Collection saec XI]] | |||
[[Category:Clavis entries based on manuscript]] | |||
Latest revision as of 14:56, 1 December 2025
| Title | Collectio Ashburnhamensis |
|---|---|
| Key | LM |
| Size | Very small (less than 100 canons) |
| Terminus post quem | 1040 |
| Terminus ante quem | 1060 |
| Century | saec. XI |
| Place of origin | Rome |
| European region of origin | Central Italy |
| General region of origin | Southern Europe and Mediterranean |
| Specific region of origin | Rome |
| Author | Linda Fowler-Magerl |
| No. of manuscripts | one |
The Collectio Ashburnhamensis is named after the only known manuscript, Firenze, BML, Ashburnham 1554 (LM). It is related to the Collectio canonum I in Paris, BnF, lat. 3858C (MY). Linda Fowler-Magerl assumed that both collections have a common formal source, the lost intermediate collection she labelled "lm/my".
Like MY, LM begins with series of canons from the 74T and continues with a mixture of canons from the 74T, the 4L and texts also found in the A Aucta form of the collection of Anselm of Lucca. Its canons are divided into titles, but neither titles nor canons are numbered. LM has been described as a collection in two parts because of conciliar decrees which follow the collection, [149] but neither the conciliar canons nor LM is referred to as pars or liber and the conciliar canons are in no way attached to LM.
The Ashburnham manuscript contains material from northern France not in the Paris manuscript. This testifies to the flow of information [150] in both directions common in the late 11th century.
Literature
For a more detailed comparison of the two collections see Fowler-Magerl, The Relationship, pp. 241–260. – Kéry, Collections p. 278.
