Collectio Tuberiensis: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Text replacement - "Category:Collection]]" to "Category:Canonical Collection]]")
No edit summary
 
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
The fragments (coming from 16 folios of three different quires) contains parts of a relatively elaborate capitulatio, and the numbers reappear in the collection itseld. Apparently, the collection originally had contained 286 canons. Most of the material are conciliar canons of the fourth and fifth centuries, but also some papal letters including {{JK|255}}. Of these materials, only some are contained in the extant fragments, as Mordek noted:
The fragments (coming from 16 folios of three different quires) contains parts of a relatively elaborate capitulatio, and the numbers reappear in the collection itseld. Apparently, the collection originally had contained 286 canons. Most of the material are conciliar canons of the fourth and fifth centuries, but also some papal letters including {{JK|255}}. Of these materials, only some are contained in the extant fragments, as Mordek noted:
:Als  sichere  Bestandteile der  Collectio  Tuberiensis  (Tb)  sind  — da  in  Text  und/oder  Capitulatio ausgewiesen  —  die Kanones von Nikäa  (mit  Beiwerk),  Ankyra, Karthago,  Rom  (Exempla  synodi  Romani) und  Serdika  anzusehen  sowie die Siricius-Dekretale mit dem voraufgehenden unbekannten  Überlie-ferungsrest.
:Als  sichere  Bestandteile der  Collectio  Tuberiensis  (Tb)  sind  — da  in  Text  und/oder  Capitulatio ausgewiesen  —  die Kanones von Nikäa  (mit  Beiwerk),  Ankyra, Karthago,  Rom  (Exempla  synodi  Romani) und  Serdika  anzusehen  sowie die Siricius-Dekretale mit dem voraufgehenden unbekannten  Überlie-ferungsrest.
Other materials that (based on the [[Collectio Weingartensis|Weingartensis]]) are presumed to have been part of the Tuberiensis are conciliar canons (Neocaesarea, Gangra, Antiochia, Laodicea, Chalcedon) and two decretals of Innocent I (JK 286 and 293). The only texts that are in the Weingartensis but not the Tuberiensis (according to Mordek) are an epitome of the Serdica canons, the Tomus Damasi, and Gelasius' Generale decretum (JK 636)
Other materials that (based on the Weingartensis) are presumed to have been part of the Tuberiensis are conciliar canons (Neocaesarea, Gangra, Antiochia, Laodicea, Chalcedon) and two decretals of Innocent I (JK 286 and 293). The only texts that are in the Weingartensis but not the Tuberiensis (according to Mordek) are an epitome of the Serdica canons, the Tomus Damasi, and Gelasius' Generale decretum (JK 636)


According to Schieffer, the scribe was working with an exemplar of modest quality and added further errors.
According to Schieffer, the scribe was working with an exemplar of modest quality and added further errors.
Line 26: Line 26:
{{Author|Schieffer}}, Spätantikes Kirchenrecht (1980), online at [https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?PPN602167337%200066 DigiZeitschriften] and [https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7767/zrgka.1980.66.1.164 de Gruyter]; {{author|Mordek}}, Spätantikes Kirchenrecht (1993), online at [http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/img/?PPN=PPN602167337_0079&DMDID=DMDLOG_0005 DigiZeitschriften] and [https://doi.org/10.7767/zrgka.1993.79.1.16 de Gruyter]; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|42}}.
{{Author|Schieffer}}, Spätantikes Kirchenrecht (1980), online at [https://resolver.sub.uni-goettingen.de/purl?PPN602167337%200066 DigiZeitschriften] and [https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.7767/zrgka.1980.66.1.164 de Gruyter]; {{author|Mordek}}, Spätantikes Kirchenrecht (1993), online at [http://www.digizeitschriften.de/dms/img/?PPN=PPN602167337_0079&DMDID=DMDLOG_0005 DigiZeitschriften] and [https://doi.org/10.7767/zrgka.1993.79.1.16 de Gruyter]; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|42}}.


== Categories ==
[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
* Collection [[Category:Canonical Collection]]
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]
* not in Clavis [[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]
[[Category:Collection saec VI]]
* saec. VI [[Category:Collection saec VI]]
[[Category:Collection from Northern Italy]]
* "diocese of Trent" (Kéry), Rhetia (Mordek) hence northern Italy? [[Category:Collection from Northern Italy]]
[[Category:Stub]]
* this article is a stub [[Category:Stub]]

Latest revision as of 23:18, 12 December 2024


Title Collectio Tuberiensis
Key ?
Alternative title Rhaetian Collection
Alternative title Collection of Münstair
Century saec. VI
European region of origin Northern Italy
Main author Christof Rolker


The collection from Rhetia is dated ca. 580 ; it is extant in only one set of fragments (today München, BSB, Clm 29550/1). Kéry describes it as a "chronologically arranged collection of conciliar canons and decretals. Taken from an earlier version of the Collectio Frisingensis; very close relationship to Collectio Weingartensis."

The fragments (coming from 16 folios of three different quires) contains parts of a relatively elaborate capitulatio, and the numbers reappear in the collection itseld. Apparently, the collection originally had contained 286 canons. Most of the material are conciliar canons of the fourth and fifth centuries, but also some papal letters including JK 255. Of these materials, only some are contained in the extant fragments, as Mordek noted:

Als sichere Bestandteile der Collectio Tuberiensis (Tb) sind — da in Text und/oder Capitulatio ausgewiesen — die Kanones von Nikäa (mit Beiwerk), Ankyra, Karthago, Rom (Exempla synodi Romani) und Serdika anzusehen sowie die Siricius-Dekretale mit dem voraufgehenden unbekannten Überlie-ferungsrest.

Other materials that (based on the Weingartensis) are presumed to have been part of the Tuberiensis are conciliar canons (Neocaesarea, Gangra, Antiochia, Laodicea, Chalcedon) and two decretals of Innocent I (JK 286 and 293). The only texts that are in the Weingartensis but not the Tuberiensis (according to Mordek) are an epitome of the Serdica canons, the Tomus Damasi, and Gelasius' Generale decretum (JK 636)

According to Schieffer, the scribe was working with an exemplar of modest quality and added further errors.

The manuscript

See Category:Manuscript of Collectio Tuberiensis (1 entry)

Literature

Schieffer, Spätantikes Kirchenrecht (1980), online at DigiZeitschriften and de Gruyter; Mordek, Spätantikes Kirchenrecht (1993), online at DigiZeitschriften and de Gruyter; Kéry, Collections p. 42.