Pseudoisidore C: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m (Text replacement - "Národní Knihovna Ceské Republiky" to "Národní knihovna České republiky") |
||
(8 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
The C recension of the [[False Decretals]] is one of the major versions of this collection and is | The C recension of the [[False Decretals]] is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the [[Pseudoisidore AB|A/B recension]]. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen {{author|Patzold}} has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves. | ||
== Contents == | == Contents == | ||
The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the [[Pseudoisidore A1|A1 recension]] is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the [[Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis]]; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the [[Quesnelliana]] ([http://pseudoisidore.blogspot.com/2016/08/patzold-and-origins-of-c-recension-i.html Knibbs]). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to {{author|Patzold}} also include the [[Collectio Corbeiensis]] (for one letter), the [[Collectio Bobbiensis]], and the [[Collectio Grimanica]]. | The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the [[Pseudoisidore A1|A1 recension]] is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the [[Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis]]; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the [[Quesnelliana]] ([http://pseudoisidore.blogspot.com/2016/08/patzold-and-origins-of-c-recension-i.html Knibbs]). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to {{author|Patzold}} also include the [[Collectio Corbeiensis]] (for one letter), the [[Collectio Bobbiensis]], and the [[Collectio Grimanica]]. | ||
== Manuscripts == | |||
* [[Reims, BM, 672]] (saec. XII) | |||
* Montpellier, Bibliothèque Interuniversitaire, H 013 | |||
* Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27 | |||
* Praha, Národní knihovna České republiky, IV.B.12 | |||
==Editions and Literature== | ==Editions and Literature== | ||
See the main article [[Pseudoisidore, False Decretals]] | See the main article [[Pseudoisidore, False Decretals]] | ||
[[Category:Collection]] | [[Category:Canonical Collection]] | ||
[[Category:Collection saec IX]] | [[Category:Collection saec IX]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Lacks infobox]] | ||
[[Category: | [[Category:Lacks categories]] | ||
[[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries]] | [[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries]] | ||
[[Category:large (1000 to 2000 canons) collection]] | [[Category:large (1000 to 2000 canons) collection]] | ||
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]] | [[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]] |
Latest revision as of 00:21, 8 October 2024
The C recension of the False Decretals is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the A/B recension. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen Patzold has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.
Contents
The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the A1 recension is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the Quesnelliana (Knibbs). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to Patzold also include the Collectio Corbeiensis (for one letter), the Collectio Bobbiensis, and the Collectio Grimanica.
Manuscripts
- Reims, BM, 672 (saec. XII)
- Montpellier, Bibliothèque Interuniversitaire, H 013
- Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27
- Praha, Národní knihovna České republiky, IV.B.12
Editions and Literature
See the main article Pseudoisidore, False Decretals