Pseudoisidore C: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
(created article based on Knibbs http://pseudoisidore.blogspot.com/2016/08/patzold-and-origins-of-c-recension-i.html)
 
m (Text replacement - "Národní Knihovna Ceské Republiky" to "Národní knihovna České republiky")
 
(9 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The C recension of the [[False Decretals]] is one of the major versions of this collection and is derives from the [[Pseudoisidore AB|A/B recension]]. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen {{author|Patzold}} has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.
The C recension of the [[False Decretals]] is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the [[Pseudoisidore AB|A/B recension]]. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen {{author|Patzold}} has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.


== Contents ==
== Contents ==
The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the [[Pseudoisidore A1|A1 recension]] is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the [[Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis]]; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the [[Quesnelliana]] ([http://pseudoisidore.blogspot.com/2016/08/patzold-and-origins-of-c-recension-i.html Knibbs]). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to {{author|Patzold}} also include the [[Collectio Corbeiensis]] (for one letter), the [[Collectio Bobbiensis]], and the [[Collectio Grimanica]].
The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the [[Pseudoisidore A1|A1 recension]] is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the [[Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis]]; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the [[Quesnelliana]] ([http://pseudoisidore.blogspot.com/2016/08/patzold-and-origins-of-c-recension-i.html Knibbs]). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to {{author|Patzold}} also include the [[Collectio Corbeiensis]] (for one letter), the [[Collectio Bobbiensis]], and the [[Collectio Grimanica]].
== Manuscripts ==
* [[Reims, BM, 672]] (saec. XII)
* Montpellier, Bibliothèque Interuniversitaire, H 013
* Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27
* Praha, Národní knihovna České republiky, IV.B.12


==Editions and Literature==
==Editions and Literature==
See the main article [[Pseudoisidore, False Decretals]]
See the main article [[Pseudoisidore, False Decretals]]


[[Category:Collection]]
[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]
[[Category:Articles that lack an infobox]]  
[[Category:Lacks infobox]]  
[[Category:Descriptions lacking categories]]
[[Category:Lacks categories]]
[[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries]]   
[[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries]]   
[[Category:large (1000 to 2000 canons) collection]]
[[Category:large (1000 to 2000 canons) collection]]
[[Category:Collection only partly in database]]
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]

Latest revision as of 00:21, 8 October 2024

The C recension of the False Decretals is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the A/B recension. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen Patzold has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.

Contents

The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the A1 recension is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the Quesnelliana (Knibbs). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to Patzold also include the Collectio Corbeiensis (for one letter), the Collectio Bobbiensis, and the Collectio Grimanica.

Manuscripts

  • Montpellier, Bibliothèque Interuniversitaire, H 013
  • Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27
  • Praha, Národní knihovna České republiky, IV.B.12

Editions and Literature

See the main article Pseudoisidore, False Decretals