Bamberg, Staatsbibliothek, Msc.Can.4: Difference between revisions
additions based on Hoffmann |
additions based on catalogue |
||
| (3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| library = Bamberg, Staatsbibliothek | | library = Bamberg, Staatsbibliothek | ||
| shelfmark = Msc.Can.4 | | shelfmark = Msc.Can.4 | ||
| normregion = | | normregion = Northern Italy | ||
| biblissima = Q252631 | | biblissima = Q252631 | ||
| digitalimages = [https://zendsbb.digitale-sammlungen.de/db/0000/sbb00000070/images/index.html zendsbb.digitale-sammlungen.de] | | digitalimages = [https://zendsbb.digitale-sammlungen.de/db/0000/sbb00000070/images/index.html zendsbb.digitale-sammlungen.de] | ||
| author1 = [[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]] | | author1 = [[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]] | ||
|century=saec. XI|provenance=Bamberg cathedral|coll=Pseudoisidore | |century=saec. X/XI|century2=saec. XI|provenance=Bamberg cathedral|coll=Pseudoisidore A2|olim=P.I.8}} | ||
This article is a stub. | |||
{{Author|Hoffmann}}, Bamberger Handschriften pp. 121-122. - {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|100}}. | The composite manuscript contains the ''Constitum Constantini'' in part I (Italian, ca. 1000) and the A2 version of [[Pseudoisidore, False Decretals|Pseudoisidore]] in part II (Italian, early eleventh century); later hands (saec. XI<sup>2/4</sup> or XI<sup>3/4</sup>) have made additions on fol. 146v-149r. If these additions are Italian too, the codex cannot have been gifted to Bamberg by Henry II as is commonly assumed. A list of the archbishops of Milan in pt. I and ''Fraterne mortis'' ({{JL+|6613a}}; among the late additions) links the manuscript to this province. | ||
[[File:Bamberg MscCan4 fol17.png|500px|thumb|left|Note on fol. 17r (image turned 90° here)]] | |||
According to a marginal note fol. 17r (saec. XI, partly damaged), the Pseudoisidore part was bought by a bishop named Anselm: ''Istum librum sibi adquisiuit Anselmus episcopus''. Hoffmann tought it possible that this referred to Anselm I or II of Lucca or Anselm II of Aosta. As he rightly pointed out, Archbishop Anselm of Milan would likely not have referred to himself as ''episcopus'' only. | |||
== Literature == | |||
{{Author|Hoffmann}}, Bamberger Handschriften pp. [https://data.mgh.de/ext/reader/spc/hoba/ 121]-122. - {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|100}}. - {{Author|Suckale-Redlefsen}}, Illuminierte Handschriften I,1 pp. [https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:bvb:22-dtl-0000025236#0095 59]-61. | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Bamberg, Staatsbibliothek, Msc.Can.00004}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Bamberg, Staatsbibliothek, Msc.Can.00004}} | ||
[[Category:Manuscript]] | [[Category:Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Manuscript from Northern Italy]] | |||
[[Category:Composite Manuscript]] | [[Category:Composite Manuscript]] | ||
[[Category:Manuscript of IS]] | [[Category:Manuscript of IS]] | ||
Latest revision as of 16:04, 1 April 2026
| Library | Bamberg, Staatsbibliothek |
|---|---|
| Shelfmark | Msc.Can.4 |
| Olim shelfmark | P.I.8 |
| Century | saec. X/XI |
| Century 2 | saec. XI |
| Provenance | Bamberg cathedral |
| European region of origin | Northern Italy |
| Biblissima QID | Q252631 |
| Collection | Pseudoisidore A2 |
| Digital Images | zendsbb.digitale-sammlungen.de |
| Author | Christof Rolker |
This article is a stub.
The composite manuscript contains the Constitum Constantini in part I (Italian, ca. 1000) and the A2 version of Pseudoisidore in part II (Italian, early eleventh century); later hands (saec. XI2/4 or XI3/4) have made additions on fol. 146v-149r. If these additions are Italian too, the codex cannot have been gifted to Bamberg by Henry II as is commonly assumed. A list of the archbishops of Milan in pt. I and Fraterne mortis (JL †6613a; among the late additions) links the manuscript to this province.
According to a marginal note fol. 17r (saec. XI, partly damaged), the Pseudoisidore part was bought by a bishop named Anselm: Istum librum sibi adquisiuit Anselmus episcopus. Hoffmann tought it possible that this referred to Anselm I or II of Lucca or Anselm II of Aosta. As he rightly pointed out, Archbishop Anselm of Milan would likely not have referred to himself as episcopus only.
Literature
Hoffmann, Bamberger Handschriften pp. 121-122. - Kéry, Collections p. 100. - Suckale-Redlefsen, Illuminierte Handschriften I,1 pp. 59-61.
