JK 348: Difference between revisions
From Clavis Canonum
No edit summary |
(Undo revision 7542 by Christof Rolker (talk)) Tag: Undo |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
781 JK 348 Dilectionis vestrae pagina | Jaffe 3 no 781 = {{JK|348}} - Incipit Dilectionis vestrae pagina | ||
783 JK 349 Valentinae nos clerici | Jaffe3 no 783 = {{JK|349}} - Incipit Valentinae nos clerici | ||
784 JK 351 Credebamus post epistolas | |||
785 JK 366 Inter ceteras curas | Jaffe3 no 784 = {{JK|351}} - Incipit Credebamus post epistolas. In Thessalonicensis | ||
Jaffe3 no 785 = {{JK|366}} - Incipit Inter ceteras curas | |||
JK 348: 13n38 | JK 348: 13n38 | ||
Latest revision as of 11:08, 9 June 2024
Jaffe 3 no 781 = JK 348 - Incipit Dilectionis vestrae pagina
Jaffe3 no 783 = JK 349 - Incipit Valentinae nos clerici
Jaffe3 no 784 = JK 351 - Incipit Credebamus post epistolas. In Thessalonicensis
Jaffe3 no 785 = JK 366 - Incipit Inter ceteras curas
JK 348: 13n38 JK 349 nicht erwähnt JK 351: 40, 82 n. 359 JK 366 nicht erwähnt
Jasper, Papal Letters, p. 40:
- The canonists ignored Zosimus’ six other letters (JK 331-334, 340, 341). Pope Boniface’s situation is similar: his letters (JK 350, 351, 363-365) in the Collectio Thessalonicensis were either quite unknown to the canonists or were ignored. In the canonistic literature, Boniface appears most frequently in letters forged in his name.'
