User:Christof Rolker: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
(test of new idea with EndNote)
 
(9 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:


== User Guides ==
== User Guides ==
[[Friedberg's Liber Extra]]


== Test bibliography ==
=== Guides to important editions ===
[[Liber Extra ed Friedberg|Friedberg's Liber Extra]]


=== Definitionen im Rahmen des Akademieprojekts ===
Was ist eigentlich ...


==== Jean Gaudemet, Sources du Décret ====
... eine [[Sammlung]]?


Jean Gaudemet, ‘Les sources du Décret de Gratien’ Revue de Droit canonique 48 (1997) 247–261.
... eine [[Handschrift]]?


.... ein [[Papstbrief]] bzw. päpstliches Schreiben?


==== Jean Gaudemet, Église et cité ====
== Bibliography playground ==
 
[[Bibliography#Agustín,_Dialogi|Agustín, ''Dialogi'']]
Jean Gaudemet, Église et cité. Histoire du droit canonique (Paris 1994).
 
 
==== Tatsushi Genka, Hierarchie ====
 
Tatsushi Genka, ‘Hierarchie der Texte, Hierarchie der Autoritäten. Zur Hierarchie der Rechtsquellen bei Gratian’ Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, kanonistische Abteilung 95 (2009) 101–127.
 
 
==== Tatsushi Genka, Prologus ====
 
Tatsushi Genka, ‘Zum Prologus des Ivo von Chartres in der Lütticher Handschrift ÜB 230 ’, Von den leges barbarorum bis zum ius barbarum des Nationalsozialismus. Festschrift für Hermann Nehlsen zum 70. Geburtstag, ed. Hans-Georg Hermann, Thomas Gutmann, Joachim Rückert, Mathias Schmoeckel, and Harald Siems (Cologne 2008) 510–530.
 
 
==== Author, Adelmann of Liege and the Eucharistic controversy ====
 
Adelmann of Liege and the Eucharistic controversy, ed. Hans Geybels (Dallas medieval texts and translations 16; Leuven 2013).
 
 
==== John T. Gilchrist, Changing the structure ====
 
John T. Gilchrist, ‘Changing the structure of a canonical collection. The Collection in Seventy-four Titles, Four Books, and the Pseudo-Isidorian Decretals’, In iure veritas. Studies in canon law in memory of Schafer Williams, ed. Steven B.  Bowman and Blanche E. Cody (Cincinnati, Ohio 1991) 93–117.
 
 
==== John T. Gilchrist, Influence ====
 
John T. Gilchrist, ‘The influence of the monastic forgeries attributed to Pope Gregory I (JE †1951) and Boniface IV (JE †1996)’, Fälschungen im Mittelalter II. Gefälschte Rechtstexte / Der bestrafte Fälscher (MGH. Schriften 33/II; Hanover 1988) 263–287.
 
 
==== John T. Gilchrist, Reception ====
 
John T. Gilchrist, ‘The reception of Pope Gregory VII into the canon law (1073–1141)’ Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, kanonistische Abteilung 90 (1973) 34–82; repr. in Canon law in the age of Reform, 11th–12th century (Variorum Collected Studies Series 406, Aldershot, 1993), no. VIII.
 
 
==== Cédric Giraud, Per verba magistri ====
 
Cédric Giraud, "Per verba magistri". Anselme de Laon et son école au XIIe siècle (Bibliothèque d'histoire culturelle du Moyen Âge 8; Turnhout 2010).
 
 
==== Joseph Goering, Bishops ====
 
Joseph Goering, ‘Bishops, law, and reform in Aragon, 1076–1126, and the Liber Tarraconensis’ Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, kanonistische Abteilung 95 (2009) 1–28.
 
 
==== Joseph Goering, Scholastic turn ====
 
Joseph Goering, ‘The scholastic turn (1100–1500). Penitential theology and law in the schools’, A new history of penance, ed. Abigail A. Firey (Leiden 2009) 219–237.
 
 
==== Knut Görich, Gandersheimer Streit ====
 
Knut Görich, ‘Der Gandersheimer Streit zur Zeit Ottos III. Ein Konflikt um die Metropolitanrechte des Erzbischofs Willigis von Mainz’ Zeitschrift der Savigny-Stiftung für Rechtsgeschichte, kanonistische Abteilung 79 (1993) 56–94.
 
 
==== Georg Gresser, Synoden und Konzilien ====
 
Georg Gresser, Die Synoden und Konzilien in der Zeit des Reformpapsttums in Deutschland und Italien von Leo IX. bis Calixt II. (1049–1123) (Paderborn, Munich and Vienna 2006).
 
 
==== Michael Gullick, Lanfranc ====
 
Michael Gullick, ‘Lanfranc and the oldest manuscript of the Colllectio Lanfranci’, Bishops, texts and the use of canon law around 1100, Essays in the honour of Martin Brett, ed. Bruce Clark Brasington and Kathleen Grace Cushing (Church, faith and culture in the Middle Ages; Aldershot 2008) 79–89.
 
 
==== Richard F. Gyug, List of authorities ====
 
Richard F. Gyug, ‘The list of authorities in the illustrations of the Collection in 5 Books (MS Vat. lat. 1339)’, Ritual, text and law. Studies in medieval canon law and liturgy presented to Roger E. Reynolds, ed. Richard F. Gyug and Kathleen Grace Cushing (Church, Faith, and Culture in the Medieval West; Aldershot 2004) 241–254.
 
 
==== Sarah Hamilton, Penance ====
 
Sarah Hamilton, ‘Penance in the age of Gregorian reform’, Retribution, repentance, and reconciliation. Papers read at the 2002 summer meeting and the 2003 winter meeting of the Ecclesiastical History Society, ed. Kate Cooper and Jeremy Gregory (Studies in Church History 40; Woodbridge 2004) 47–73.
 
 
==== Sarah Hamilton, Penance ====
 
Sarah Hamilton, The practice of penance 900–1050 (Woodbridge 2001).
 
 
==== Martina Hartmann, Spätmittelalterliche und frühneuzeitliche Kritik ====
 
Martina Hartmann, ‘Spätmittelalterliche und frühneuzeitliche Kritik an den pseudoisidorischen Dekretalen. Nikolaus von Kues und Heinrich Kalteisen als "Wahrheitszeugen" bei Matthias Flacius Illyricus und den Magdeburger Centuriatoren ’, Fortschritt durch Fälschungen? Ursprung, Gestalt und Wirkungen der pseudoisidorischen Fälschungen. Beiträge zum gleichnamigen Symposium an der Universität Tübingen vom 27. und 28. Juli 2001, ed. Wilfried Hartmann and Gerhard Schmitz (MGH. Studien und Texte 31; Hanover 2002) 191–210.
 
 
==== Wilfried Hartmann, Autoritäten im Kirchenrecht ====
 
Wilfried Hartmann, ‘Autoritäten im Kirchenrecht und Autorität des Kirchenrechts in der Salierzeit’, Gesellschaftlicher und ideengeschichtlicher Wandel im Reich der Salier, ed. Stefan Weinfurter and Hubertus Seibert (Die Salier und das Reich 3; Sigmaringen 1991) 425–446.


== Historiographical background ==
== Historiographical background ==
Line 111: Line 28:
* Categories may be helpful to alert readers who influenced research on which collections/manuscripts.
* Categories may be helpful to alert readers who influenced research on which collections/manuscripts.


== Statistics ==
== Individual papal letters ==
*Collections by century:
* [[JK 675]]
**saec. V‏‎: https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Category:Collection_saec_V
* [[JK 685]]
**saec. VI‏‎: https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Category:Collection_saec_VI
 
**saec. VII‏‎: https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Category:Collection_saec_VII
[[List of Gratian Manuscripts]]
**saec. VIII: https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Category:Collection_saec_VIII
 
**saec. IX: https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Category:Collection_saec_IX
 
**saec. X: https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Category:Collection_saec_X
[[Category:Akademieprojekt]]
**saec. XI: https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Category:Collection_saec_XI
**saec. XII: https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Category:Collection_saec_XII

Latest revision as of 07:36, 16 September 2024

Welcome to my user page! If you want to contact me, my email is christof dot rolker at uni-bamberg dot de.

User Guides

Guides to important editions

Friedberg's Liber Extra

Definitionen im Rahmen des Akademieprojekts

Was ist eigentlich ...

... eine Sammlung?

... eine Handschrift?

.... ein Papstbrief bzw. päpstliches Schreiben?

Bibliography playground

Agustín, Dialogi

Historiographical background

An idea Danica and I talked about:

  • Articles on some scholars and the way they influenced research, e.g. making some collections (texts, manuscripts, issues) prominent, and the ideological background of this. Examples:
    • The Ballerini brothers re-editing the Quesnelliana mainly to make the point that this was not the quasi-offical Roman law book which Quesnel thought it was. Vice versa, they argued that the Dionysio-Hadriana was the offical collection and stressed Pope Hadrian's role in making and distributing it. All this only makes sense if one knows a bit about 18th c. Gallicanism.
    • A similar, slightly more harmless, example is the collection today known as Corpus canonum Africano-Romanum which was renamed several times.
    • Friedberg's interest in medieval canon law of marriage is very directly link to his support of Prussian marriage law of his time. His decision to integrate the editio Romana in his edition of Gratian is perhaps best understood as courtesy towards catholic users of his edition (taking into account that catholic scholars at the time were effectively prohibited from doing a critical edition of the Corpus Iuris Canonici). The background here is the Kulturkampf, and discussions within the catholic church and beyond about Vatican I.
  • Some of this may best be integrated in the articles on individual collections, but we also need short articles on the scholars to addresse recurring issues.
  • Categories may be helpful to alert readers who influenced research on which collections/manuscripts.

Individual papal letters

List of Gratian Manuscripts