Collectio X partium in Köln, Historisches Archiv, Bestand 7010, 199: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Text replacement - "\{\{Author\|Kéry\}\}, Canonical Collections, p\. ([0-9][0-9][0-9])" to "{{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery|$1}}")
(Typo)
 
(10 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:The ''Collectio X partium'' of the Ms Cologne, Historisches Archiv W.Kl. fol. 199}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:The ''Collectio X partium'' in Köln, Historisches Archiv, Bestand 7010, 199}}


With few exceptions the canons in the collection in [[Köln, Historisches Archiv, Bestand 7010, 199]] ({{Coll|KO}}) are taken from ''Collectio A'' of the ''Tripartita.'' The prologue is also the same. Each of the ten parts is divided into ''distinctiones''. In the last part these distinctions are sometimes called ''portitiones''. As in the ''Tripartita'', the most recent decretals are those of pope Urban II. A notable number of his decretals, scattered throughout the collection, concern the discipline of canons regular. The decree ''Mandamus et mandantes'', attributed here (7. 6. 2) to the council of Piacenza (1095), prohibits canons regular from becoming monks. A decree belonging with certainty to that council, ''De communi clericorum vita'' (6. 1. 6), forbids canons from having benefices of their own. ''Due leges sunt'' (JL 5760), here attributed simply to „Urbanus“ (5. 16. 21), forbids those who have vowed to lead the common life from breaking that vow. Inserted into book four is a distinction not numbered and not listed in the ''capitulatio'': ''De usu pallii in cena domini et de gloria in excelsis et alleluia et de diebus purgationum.''
{{Infobox collection
    | key            = KO
    | size          = Very large (more than 2000 canons)
    | tpq            = 1139
    | taq            = 1199
    | century        = saec. XII
    | location      = Rhineland
    | normregion    = Western Germany
    | generalregion  = Northwestern Europe
    | specificregion = Rhineland
    | title          = Collectio X partium
    | alttitle1      = Collectio X partium in Köln 199
    | alttitle2      = Cologne 10P
    | alttitle3      = Collectio Wallrafiensis
    | author1        = [[User:MB|Martin Brett]]
}}


The titles of the first five parts are taken from the Decretum of Ivo. On fol. 10r–13r is a description of the parts: ''Prima pars continet de fide et baptismo et manus impositione, habens undecim distinctiones. Secunda pars continet de sacramento corporis et sanguinis domini, de missa et de quibusdam aliis officiis, de reverentia sacrorum vasorum et vestimentorum, de unctione infirmorum et conspersione salis et aque, habens decem et septem distinctiones. Tercia pars continet de ecclesia et de rebus ecclesiasticis et de sacerdotibus et earumdem reverencia et observacione, habens decem et octo distinctiones. Quarta pars continet octo distinctiones. Quinta pars continet de electione et consecratione pape, archiepiscoporum, presbiterorum et reliquorum graduum, habens distinctiones sedecim. Sexta pars continet de vita et correctione supradictorum graduum, habens distinctiones xiii. Septima pars continet de monachis et sacris virginibus et viduis, habens distinctiones xvii. Octava pars continet de negotiis et causis clericorum, habens xiiii. Nona pars maxime agitur de vita et instructione et correctione laicorum, habens distinctiones decem et septem. Decima pars continet de coniugio et de transgressione eius et fornicatione diversi generis, habens xv. porticiones.''  {{FM|192}}


The one surviving copy of the collection in ten parts was made several decades later than the collection itself. Decrees from the councils of Clermont-Ferrand (1130) and Reims (1131) and from the second Lateran council of 1139 are found at the end of the manuscript. The name Nicholas is always spelled „Nykolaus“, an indication that the manuscript was copied east of the Rhine. The manuscript belonged for a time to the Stift Knechtsteden, which was founded by the Premonstratensians in 1130. Folios are missing between the present folios 25 and 26, and as a result the canons between part 2 distinction 5 and part 3 distinction 8 are missing. The first distinction in part 6 is also missing.
The Cologne Collection in Ten Parts ({{Coll|KO}}) parts is largely a re-arrangement of part A of the [[Collectio Tripartita]] in ten topical books. {{author|Trede}} in 2005 proposed to rename it „Collectio Wallrafiensis“, but this was not taken up by scholarship.


== Manuscripts ==
== The Manuscripts ==
In the 2005 version of the Clavis handbook (pp. {{FM|191}}-192) it was described on the basis of [[Köln, Historisches Archiv, Bestand 7010, 199]], which for a long time was the only known copy. It has suffered some damage, and particularly the loss of a quire containing 2.15.3 med.–3.7.12. A second version in [[Leipzig, Universitätsbibliothek, Cod. Haen. 16]], also once at Cologne, is a better copy, and probably is the source for the one still at Cologne. It too has lost a quire, this one covering 5.2.25 med. – 5.4.62 med., so between the two mss the whole can be reconstructed.


* See here for the Cologne manuscript: [[Köln, Historisches Archiv, Bestand 7010, 199]]
== The Tripartia Version Used ==
Though neither {{Author|Petersmann}} nor {{Author|Fowler-Magerl}} made the claim, their accounts could be read as suggesting this as a witness to the circulation of Tripartita A without Tripartita B. However, Tripartita B does in fact appear occasionally in the collection – Köln, fol. 35v for Trip. 3.3.11-2, Leipzig fo.56r-v for Trip. 3.10.43, Köln, fol. 113v for Trip. 3.12.8, fol. 114v for 3.13.1, fol. 116v for 3.3.12, fols 118v-119v for 3.8.6-7a and 3.8.9; fol. 140 for 3.10.53; fo. 151 for 3.10.50; fos 153v-154v for 3.9.23; fol. 158v for 3.27.15; fol. 167r-v for 3.15.1, 3.15.4b, fol. 169r-v for 3.15.5b, 3.15.17, 21, 22; fol. 173 for 3.15.79; fol. 178v-179 for 3.16.8, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18; fos 179v-180 for 3.16.26. Further, sample collation of the Trip. A texts included shows that these were taken from the later state of the text, including 1.14.14. and 1.38.26a, peculiar to the later form. Though the editorial activity here is of considerable interest, it is most unlikely that the variants of the manuscript take one behind the text of more conventional copies.


* The other manuscript is Leipzig, UB, Hänel 16: https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Leipzig,_Universit%C3%A4tsbibliothek,_H%C3%A4nel_16
== Manuscripts ==
Two manuscripts are known:
* [[Köln, Historisches Archiv, Bestand 7010, 199]]
* [[Leipzig, Universitätsbibliothek, Cod. Haen. 16]]


== Literature ==
== Literature ==
The first person to recognize the significance of the collection was Johanna {{Author|Petersmann}}, Die kanonistische Überlieferung des Constitutum Constantini bis zum Dekret Gratians: Untersuchung und Edition, DA 30 (1974), pp. 447–449. The Cologne manuscript had been known until then only for its artful initials and texts dealing with trade in Cologne in the early 12th century. Bruce {{Author|Brasington}} generously shared his notes with {{Author|Fowler-Magerl}} and {{Author|Brett}}. – For the texts on canons regular see Charles {{Author|Dereine}}, L’élaboration du statut canonique des chanoines réguliers spécialement sous Urbain II, RHE 46 (1951), pp. 534–565. – {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery|287}} - {{author|Trede}}, Die juristischen Handschriften pp. 79-80 http://bilder.manuscripta-mediaevalia.de/hs/katalogseiten/HSK0556_b077_jpg.htm.


The first person to recognize the significance of the collection was Johanna {{Author|Petersmann}}, Die kanonistische Überlieferung des Constitutum Constantini bis zum Dekret Gratians: Untersuchung und Edition, DA 30 (1974), pp. 447–449. The manuscript had been known until then only for its artful initials and texts dealing with trade in Cologne in the early 12th century. Bruce {{Author|Brasington}} generously put notes on this collection at my disposal. – For the texts on canons regular see Charles {{Author|Dereine}}, L’élaboration du statut canonique des chanoines réguliers spécialement sous Urbain II, RHE 46 (1951), pp. 534–565. – {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery|287}}.
== Links ==
* Description: https://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita/trip_a_pref.pdf


== Categories ==
== Categories ==
* Collection [[Category:Collection]]
* Collection [[Category:Canonical Collection]]
* key is KO [[Category:Collection Key is KO]]  
* key is KO [[Category:Collection Key is KO]]  
* very large (more than 2000 canons) collection [[Category:very large (more than 2000 canons) collection]]   
* very large (more than 2000 canons) collection [[Category:very large (more than 2000 canons) collection]]   

Latest revision as of 05:51, 16 August 2024


Title Collectio X partium
Key KO
Alternative title Collectio X partium in Köln 199
Alternative title Cologne 10P
Alternative title Collectio Wallrafiensis
Size Very large (more than 2000 canons)
Terminus post quem 1139
Terminus ante quem 1199
Century saec. XII
Place of origin Rhineland
European region of origin Western Germany
General region of origin Northwestern Europe
Specific region of origin Rhineland
Main author Martin Brett


The Cologne Collection in Ten Parts (KO) parts is largely a re-arrangement of part A of the Collectio Tripartita in ten topical books. Trede in 2005 proposed to rename it „Collectio Wallrafiensis“, but this was not taken up by scholarship.

The Manuscripts

In the 2005 version of the Clavis handbook (pp. 191-192) it was described on the basis of Köln, Historisches Archiv, Bestand 7010, 199, which for a long time was the only known copy. It has suffered some damage, and particularly the loss of a quire containing 2.15.3 med.–3.7.12. A second version in Leipzig, Universitätsbibliothek, Cod. Haen. 16, also once at Cologne, is a better copy, and probably is the source for the one still at Cologne. It too has lost a quire, this one covering 5.2.25 med. – 5.4.62 med., so between the two mss the whole can be reconstructed.

The Tripartia Version Used

Though neither Petersmann nor Fowler-Magerl made the claim, their accounts could be read as suggesting this as a witness to the circulation of Tripartita A without Tripartita B. However, Tripartita B does in fact appear occasionally in the collection – Köln, fol. 35v for Trip. 3.3.11-2, Leipzig fo.56r-v for Trip. 3.10.43, Köln, fol. 113v for Trip. 3.12.8, fol. 114v for 3.13.1, fol. 116v for 3.3.12, fols 118v-119v for 3.8.6-7a and 3.8.9; fol. 140 for 3.10.53; fo. 151 for 3.10.50; fos 153v-154v for 3.9.23; fol. 158v for 3.27.15; fol. 167r-v for 3.15.1, 3.15.4b, fol. 169r-v for 3.15.5b, 3.15.17, 21, 22; fol. 173 for 3.15.79; fol. 178v-179 for 3.16.8, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18; fos 179v-180 for 3.16.26. Further, sample collation of the Trip. A texts included shows that these were taken from the later state of the text, including 1.14.14. and 1.38.26a, peculiar to the later form. Though the editorial activity here is of considerable interest, it is most unlikely that the variants of the manuscript take one behind the text of more conventional copies.

Manuscripts

Two manuscripts are known:

Literature

The first person to recognize the significance of the collection was Johanna Petersmann, Die kanonistische Überlieferung des Constitutum Constantini bis zum Dekret Gratians: Untersuchung und Edition, DA 30 (1974), pp. 447–449. The Cologne manuscript had been known until then only for its artful initials and texts dealing with trade in Cologne in the early 12th century. Bruce Brasington generously shared his notes with Fowler-Magerl and Brett. – For the texts on canons regular see Charles Dereine, L’élaboration du statut canonique des chanoines réguliers spécialement sous Urbain II, RHE 46 (1951), pp. 534–565. – Kéry, Collections p. 287 - Trede, Die juristischen Handschriften pp. 79-80 http://bilder.manuscripta-mediaevalia.de/hs/katalogseiten/HSK0556_b077_jpg.htm.

Links

Categories

  • Collection
  • key is KO
  • very large (more than 2000 canons) collection
  • from Rhineland
  • saec. XII
  • entries based on MS

DEFAULTSORT Collectio 010 partium Köln