Metz, BM, 100: Difference between revisions
Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
Replacetext (talk | contribs) m Text replacement - "Coillections " to "Collections " |
Bot: Infobox formatiert und Parameter sortiert |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Infobox manuscript | {{ Infobox manuscript | ||
| library | | library = Metz, BM | ||
| shelfmark | | shelfmark = 100 | ||
| | | century = saec. XII | ||
| normregion = unknown <-- manuscript cannot at present be categorized in one of our regions according to [[Categories for manuscripts by region]]. --> | | normregion = unknown <-- manuscript cannot at present be categorized in one of our regions according to [[Categories for manuscripts by region]]. --> | ||
| coll | | coll = Collectio Anselmo dedicata | ||
| | | author1 = [[User:Lotte Kéry|Lotte Kéry]] | ||
}}Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the ''[[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]]'' lost and likely destroyed in 1944. | }} | ||
Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the ''[[Collectio Anselmo dedicata]]'' lost and likely destroyed in 1944. | |||
According to the online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr]) "Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit". This description seems to confuse the ''Anselmo dedicata'' both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the ''Anselmo dedicata'' have used the Metz manuscript ({{author|Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier}}) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other ''Anselmiana''. | According to the online description ([https://bm.metz.fr/iguana/www.main.cls?surl=search&p=d2d29c5a-3e3b-11e3-bf0b-5056be00fa00#recordId=1.113799&srchDb=1 https://bm.metz.fr]) "Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit". This description seems to confuse the ''Anselmo dedicata'' both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the ''Anselmo dedicata'' have used the Metz manuscript ({{author|Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier}}) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other ''Anselmiana''. | ||
| Line 14: | Line 16: | ||
See {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|125}}. Note that the entry "Metz, Biblioteca civica, lat. 100" in Clavis handbook p. {{FM|273}} refers to this manuscript. | See {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|125}}. Note that the entry "Metz, Biblioteca civica, lat. 100" in Clavis handbook p. {{FM|273}} refers to this manuscript. | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Metz, BM, 00100}} | |||
[[Category:Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Correction to Clavis handbook]] | |||
[[Category:Lost Manuscript]] | |||
[[Category:Manuscript in Metz, BM]] | |||
[[Category:Manuscript of DE]] | [[Category:Manuscript of DE]] | ||
[[Category:Manuscript saec XII]] | [[Category:Manuscript saec XII]] | ||
Latest revision as of 15:34, 24 January 2026
| Library | Metz, BM |
|---|---|
| Shelfmark | 100 |
| Century | saec. XII |
| Provenance | ? |
| European region of origin | unknown <-- manuscript cannot at present be categorized in one of our regions according to Categories for manuscripts by region. --> |
| Collection | Collectio Anselmo dedicata |
| Author | Lotte Kéry |
Metz, BM, 100 was a copy of the Collectio Anselmo dedicata lost and likely destroyed in 1944.
According to the online description (https://bm.metz.fr) "Provenance : cathédrale de Metz Réserve précieuse : MS 100. Manuscrit perdu en 1944, réputé détruit". This description seems to confuse the Anselmo dedicata both with the collection of Anselm of Lucca and one attibuted to Anselm of Canterbury; however, many scholars familiar with the Anselmo dedicata have used the Metz manuscript (Savigny, Dobschütz, Fournier) so there can be no doubt it really contained this collection, not any other Anselmiana.
Commonly dated to the 12th century (e.g. Dobschütz).
See Kéry, Collections p. 125. Note that the entry "Metz, Biblioteca civica, lat. 100" in Clavis handbook p. 273 refers to this manuscript.
