Düsseldorf, ULB, E.1: Difference between revisions

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
JJakob (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Bot: Infobox formatiert und Parameter sortiert; URLs formatiert: descriptionat
 
(22 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Düsseldorf, Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek, E.1 is a ninth-cemtury canon law miscellany. According to the [https://digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de/ms/content/titleinfo/3870845 ULB description], it comtains a small Cresconois fragment plus the [[Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana|Dionysio-Hadriana]]. Kéry, p. {{Kéry|15}} relates that Zechiel-Exkes optet for the [[Collectio Vaticana in Vat. lat. 1342]] instead of the Dionysio-Hadriana.
{{ Infobox manuscript
    | library        = Düsseldorf, ULB
    | shelfmark      = E.1
    | century        = saec. IX<sup>2/2</sup>
    | provenance    = Essen
    | location      = probably Rome
    | normregion    = Central Italy
    | bischoffnumber = 1070 p. 231
    | coll          = Collectio Vaticana in Vat. lat. 1342
    | digitalimages  = [https://digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de/ms/content/titleinfo/3870845 digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de]
    | descriptionat  = [https://resolver.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/HSP00067B3500000000 HSP]
    | author1        = [[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]]
}}


Digital images: https://digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de/ms/content/titleinfo/3870845
'''Düsseldorf, ULB, E1''' is a canon law miscellany of 146 folios written in two columns. Bischoff dated it to second half of the ninth century and based on the ''probationes pennae'' argued that it still was in Italy saec. XI; it may be the "liber canonum" in the Essen catalogue also dated saec. XI, and certainly was in Essen in the twelfth century, where it remained until 1820. The modern catalogue follows Bischoff for the date and asserts the manuscript was probably written in Rome.


= Categories ==
According to the [https://digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de/ms/content/titleinfo/3870845 ULB description], it contains a small [[Cresconius, Concordia canonum|Cresconius]] fragment plus the ''[[Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana|Dionysio-Hadriana]]''. However, Kéry, p. {{Kéry|15}} following Zechiel-Eckes counted it as a copy of the [[Collectio Vaticana in Vat. lat. 1342]] instead of the Dionysio-Hadriana.
* manuscript [[Category:Manuscript]]
==Literature==
* not in Clavis [[Category:Manuscript not in Clavis handbook]]
{{Author|Kéry}}, Collections pp. {{Kéry|15}}, {{Kéry|25}}.
* digitized [[Category:Digitized Manuscript]]
 
* saec. IX (Kéry) [[Category:Manuscript saec IX]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Düsseldorf, ULB, E.00001}}
* from Italy, perhaps Rome [[Category:Manuscript from Central Italy]]
 
* copy of Collectio Vaticana in Vat. lat. 1342 [[Category:Manuscript of Collectio Vaticana in Vat. lat. 1342]]
[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Digitized Manuscript]]
[[Category:Latin Manuscript]]
[[Category:Manuscript from Central Italy]]
[[Category:Manuscript from Rome]]
[[Category:Manuscript in Düsseldorf, ULB]]
[[Category:Manuscript not in Clavis handbook]]
[[Category:Manuscript of Collectio Vaticana in Vat. lat. 1342]]
[[Category:Manuscript of early papal letters]]
[[Category:Manuscript saec IX]]

Latest revision as of 22:31, 24 January 2026

Library Düsseldorf, ULB
Shelfmark E.1
Century saec. IX2/2
Provenance Essen
Place of origin probably Rome
European region of origin Central Italy
Collection Collectio Vaticana in Vat. lat. 1342
Digital Images digital.ub.uni-duesseldorf.de
Description at HSP
Bischoff number 1070 p. 231
Author Christof Rolker


Düsseldorf, ULB, E1 is a canon law miscellany of 146 folios written in two columns. Bischoff dated it to second half of the ninth century and based on the probationes pennae argued that it still was in Italy saec. XI; it may be the "liber canonum" in the Essen catalogue also dated saec. XI, and certainly was in Essen in the twelfth century, where it remained until 1820. The modern catalogue follows Bischoff for the date and asserts the manuscript was probably written in Rome.

According to the ULB description, it contains a small Cresconius fragment plus the Dionysio-Hadriana. However, Kéry, p. 15 following Zechiel-Eckes counted it as a copy of the Collectio Vaticana in Vat. lat. 1342 instead of the Dionysio-Hadriana.

Literature

Kéry, Collections pp. 15, 25.