Collectio Albigensis: Difference between revisions

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
No edit summary
 
(14 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Collection of the sixth century extant in [[Toulouse, BM, 364 (I. 63)]] and [[Paris, BnF, lat. 8901]]. See Mordek, Kirchenrecht pp. 49-50. Maassen refers to it as "Sammlung der Handschrift von Albi"
{{Infobox collection|title=Collectio Albigensis|alttitle=Sammlung der Handschrift von Albi|author1=[[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]]|tpq=549|century=saec. VI|normregion=Southern France|wikidata=Q127691996|mss=some (2–9)}}
 
The ''Collectio Albingensis'' (after Albi, BM, 2) is a collection compiled in sixth-century Gaul; the most recent material comes from the council of Orléans 549, and {{author|Mordek}} p. 39. n. 14 argued that the collection was compiled soon after (rejecting argument for a late date based on the papal catalogues). Both {{author|Maassen}} and {{author|Mordek}} refer to it as "Sammlung der Handschrift von Albi".
 
== Relation to other collections ==
{{author|Maassen}} pointed to the use of the ''[[Collectio Dionysiana I]]'' for the ''Albigensis''; according to him, the ''Albigensis'' also used the ''[[Collectio Corbeiensis]]'' or a very similar collection.
 
{{author|Mordek}} pp. 39-42 argued that the compiler of the ''[[Collectio Vetus Gallica]]'' did not use the ''Albigensis'', but worked with the immediate sources of the latter, namely a version of the ''Corbeiensis'' and a (fragmentary?) version of the ''Dionysiana''. He based his claim mainly on the presence of Sardinca c. 13 in both collections, and {{JK|311}}. As he argued, these materials were more similar to the ''Albingensis'' than the ''Corbeiensis'', and indeed he asserted that "der Autor der Vetus Gallica die Collectio Albigensis in einer älteren, heute verschollenen Form zur Hand hatte", apparently referring to the same texts (p. 42).
 
== The manuscripts ==
For manuscripts, see [[:Category:Manuscript of Collectio Albigensis]] (number of entries: {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Manuscript of Collectio Albigensis}}).
* [[Albi, BM, 2]]
* [[Albi, BM, 38]], excerpt
* [[Paris, BnF, lat. 8901]] / [[Toulouse, BM, 364]] (I. 63), a ''codex discissus'' according to CLA


== Literature ==
== Literature ==
{{Author|Maassen}}, Geschichte p. {{Maassen|592}}
{{Author|Maassen}}, Geschichte p. {{Maassen|592}}; {{Author|Mordek}}, [https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110831900 Kirchenrecht und Reform] pp. 39-43; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections pp. {{Kéry|46}}-47
{{Author|Mordek}}, Kirchenrecht pp. 45-49


== Categories ==
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]
* stub [[Category:Stub]]  
[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
* collection of the sixth century [[Category:Collection]] [[Category:Collection saec VI]]
[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection]]
[[Category:Pre-Gratian Collection containing papal letters]]
[[Category:Collection saec VI]]
[[Category:Collection from Southern France]]
[[Category:Collection in Maassen]]

Latest revision as of 13:24, 11 November 2025

Title Collectio Albigensis
Key ?
Alternative title Sammlung der Handschrift von Albi
Wikidata Item no. Q127691996
Terminus post quem 549
Century saec. VI
European region of origin Southern France
Author Christof Rolker
No. of manuscripts some (2–9)


The Collectio Albingensis (after Albi, BM, 2) is a collection compiled in sixth-century Gaul; the most recent material comes from the council of Orléans 549, and Mordek p. 39. n. 14 argued that the collection was compiled soon after (rejecting argument for a late date based on the papal catalogues). Both Maassen and Mordek refer to it as "Sammlung der Handschrift von Albi".

Relation to other collections

Maassen pointed to the use of the Collectio Dionysiana I for the Albigensis; according to him, the Albigensis also used the Collectio Corbeiensis or a very similar collection.

Mordek pp. 39-42 argued that the compiler of the Collectio Vetus Gallica did not use the Albigensis, but worked with the immediate sources of the latter, namely a version of the Corbeiensis and a (fragmentary?) version of the Dionysiana. He based his claim mainly on the presence of Sardinca c. 13 in both collections, and JK 311. As he argued, these materials were more similar to the Albingensis than the Corbeiensis, and indeed he asserted that "der Autor der Vetus Gallica die Collectio Albigensis in einer älteren, heute verschollenen Form zur Hand hatte", apparently referring to the same texts (p. 42).

The manuscripts

For manuscripts, see Category:Manuscript of Collectio Albigensis (number of entries: 4).

Literature

Maassen, Geschichte p. 592; Mordek, Kirchenrecht und Reform pp. 39-43; Kéry, Collections pp. 46-47