User:Christof Rolker: Difference between revisions
From Clavis Canonum
m (Text replacement - "Category:Collections" to "Category:Collection") |
|||
| (15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Welcome to my user page! If you want to contact me, my email is christof dot rolker at uni-bamberg dot de. | Welcome to my user page! If you want to contact me, my email is christof dot rolker at uni-bamberg dot de. | ||
== User Guides == | |||
=== Guides to important editions === | |||
[[Liber Extra ed Friedberg|Friedberg's Liber Extra]] | |||
=== Definitionen im Rahmen des Akademieprojekts === | |||
* | Was ist eigentlich ... | ||
** | |||
** | ... eine [[Sammlung]]? | ||
** | |||
** | ... eine [[Handschrift]]? | ||
.... ein [[Papstbrief]] bzw. päpstliches Schreiben? | |||
== Bibliography playground == | |||
[[Bibliography#Agustín,_Dialogi|Agustín, ''Dialogi'']] | |||
== Historiographical background == | |||
An idea Danica and I talked about: | |||
* Articles on some scholars and the way they influenced research, e.g. making some collections (texts, manuscripts, issues) prominent, and the ideological background of this. Examples: | |||
** The Ballerini brothers re-editing the ''Quesnelliana'' mainly to make the point that this was ''not'' the quasi-offical Roman law book which Quesnel thought it was. Vice versa, they argued that the ''Dionysio-Hadriana'' was the offical collection and stressed Pope Hadrian's role in making and distributing it. All this only makes sense if one knows a bit about 18th c. Gallicanism. | |||
** A similar, slightly more harmless, example is the collection today known as Corpus canonum Africano-Romanum which was renamed several times. | |||
** Friedberg's interest in medieval canon law of marriage is very directly link to his support of Prussian marriage law of his time. His decision to integrate the ''editio Romana'' in his edition of Gratian is perhaps best understood as courtesy towards catholic users of his edition (taking into account that catholic scholars at the time were effectively prohibited from doing a critical edition of the ''Corpus Iuris Canonici''). The background here is the Kulturkampf, and discussions within the catholic church and beyond about Vatican I. | |||
* Some of this may best be integrated in the articles on individual collections, but we also need short articles on the scholars to addresse recurring issues. | |||
* Categories may be helpful to alert readers who influenced research on which collections/manuscripts. | |||
== Individual papal letters == | |||
* [[JK 675]] | |||
* [[JK 685]] | |||
[[List of Gratian Manuscripts]] | |||
[[Category:Akademieprojekt]] | |||
Latest revision as of 07:36, 16 September 2024
Welcome to my user page! If you want to contact me, my email is christof dot rolker at uni-bamberg dot de.
User Guides
Guides to important editions
Definitionen im Rahmen des Akademieprojekts
Was ist eigentlich ...
... eine Sammlung?
... eine Handschrift?
.... ein Papstbrief bzw. päpstliches Schreiben?
Bibliography playground
Historiographical background
An idea Danica and I talked about:
- Articles on some scholars and the way they influenced research, e.g. making some collections (texts, manuscripts, issues) prominent, and the ideological background of this. Examples:
- The Ballerini brothers re-editing the Quesnelliana mainly to make the point that this was not the quasi-offical Roman law book which Quesnel thought it was. Vice versa, they argued that the Dionysio-Hadriana was the offical collection and stressed Pope Hadrian's role in making and distributing it. All this only makes sense if one knows a bit about 18th c. Gallicanism.
- A similar, slightly more harmless, example is the collection today known as Corpus canonum Africano-Romanum which was renamed several times.
- Friedberg's interest in medieval canon law of marriage is very directly link to his support of Prussian marriage law of his time. His decision to integrate the editio Romana in his edition of Gratian is perhaps best understood as courtesy towards catholic users of his edition (taking into account that catholic scholars at the time were effectively prohibited from doing a critical edition of the Corpus Iuris Canonici). The background here is the Kulturkampf, and discussions within the catholic church and beyond about Vatican I.
- Some of this may best be integrated in the articles on individual collections, but we also need short articles on the scholars to addresse recurring issues.
- Categories may be helpful to alert readers who influenced research on which collections/manuscripts.
