Search results

| specificregion = Rome ...o have been compiled, or at least planned, from the dedicatory preface; no manuscript of the collection itself is known. According to this preface, Pope Hormisda

| location = Rome | specificregion = Rome

...61) may be due to a misguided note of [[Roma, Biblioteca Casanatense, 2010|Rome, Biblioteca Casanatense, 2010]]. * Manuscript [[Category:Manuscript]]

München, BSB, Clm 14008 ({{Author|Wunderle}}: Rome, saec IX^3/3) is a copy of the [[Collectio Dionysiana adaucta]], [[Category:Manuscript]]

The manuscript contains the [[Collectio IX librorum in Città del Vaticano, Archivio di Sa * Manuscript [[Category:Manuscript]]

...it's collection]] written in the Middle Ages. The manuscript seems to date from the early twelfth century. It cannot be Deusdedit's autograph and contains * digitized [[Category:Digitized Manuscript]] [[Category:Manuscript]]

...I, fol. 284r–302v|canonical collection]] (Clavis key RE). This part of the manuscript was written in an Italian minuscle of the 11th century. ...ti della Biblioteca Vallicelliana, Vol. I (Indici e Cataloghi nuova serie; Rome 1961), pp. 283–297

...ers, providing important clues that the register version sometimes differs from the letters actually sent. The manuscript is not online, but the page with the Dictatus is, see: https://commons.wiki

[[Category:Manuscript]] [[Category:Manuscript not in Clavis handbook]]

...h century; it is extant in only one manuscript (Stuttgart, WLB, HB.VI.113; from Rhetia). Kéry describes it as a "chronologically arranged collection of co == The manuscript ==

| location = Rome | specificregion = Rome

...f the council held at Poitiers in 1078 and the canons of the synod held at Rome in November of the same year.

...r makes clear, the total of 452 includes the preceding items in the codex. Manuscript has often been read in connection with the Formosus controversy and is usua ...tulorum''. No annotation. Provides excerpts from ''Herovalliana''. Perhaps Rome, c.930?

| specificregion = Rome ...VII, although it is not in the collection itself; the most recent in MY is from pope Alexander II.

| specificregion = Rome ...t. 1342 is a small canon law collection. The collection orginally may date from the sixth century (Maassen), but as Vocino and West (following MCKitterick)

| location = Rome ...-Romanum]]''. The ''[[Collectio Quesnelliana]]'' may have been compiled at Rome in this period. The collection is an accumulation of disparate parts partic

...he collection contains the full ''[[Collectio Sanblasiana]]'' and excerpts from the ''[[Collectio Quesnelliana]]''. ...) (Stickler: more likely in Italy); Le Bras, “Notes III’ 514 n. 3: perhaps Rome?". Likewise, the date is uncertain, as {{Author|Elliot}}, Canon Law, p. 234

...c. XII 1/2). It was "likely copied at a Benedictine monastery at (or near) Rome" ({{author|Cushing}} p. 322), but must have been taken to Tuscany early on, {{Author|Fournier}} treated the manuscript as the sole copy of a collection in two parts (separated by non-canonical m

{{Infobox manuscript ...: ''Liber iste est sancte marie sanctique corbiniani frising[e]'' (by hand from s. XII).

...(canonum) Frisingensis'', often with an added ''prima'' to distinguish it from other Freising-related collections; Maasen, who only knew Clm 6342, refers ...script of Collectio Frisingensis I]] (number of entries: {{PAGESINCATEGORY:Manuscript of Collectio Frisingensis I}}).