Search results

| place = Montecassino | lib_normalized = Biblioteca statale del Monumento nazionale di Montecassino

...(see {{Author|Blumenthal}}, Reflections, 137 n. 11). The reference to this manuscript in the first edition ({{Author|Fowler-Magerl}}, Clavis, {{FM|160}}) may be [[Category:Manuscript]]

...[[Registrum Iohannis VIII|register of John VIII]] that Abbot Desiderius of Montecassino had made around 1070. It contains 314 letters written between September 876 [[Category:Manuscript]]

{{DISPLAYTITLE:Florilegium in Montecassino MS 372}} | title = Florilegium in Montecassino MS 372

According to Reynolds, the manuscript also contains canons from ''[[Collectio V librorum|Collection in Five Books]]'' (Reynolds, ''Studies *manuscript [[Category:Manuscript]]

| location = Montecassino ...uch in common with the ''Casinensis''. It, too, consists largely of canons from Burchard and the ''Collectio V librorum''.

{{Infobox manuscript ...del Monumento nazionale di Montecassino, 541 is an early eleventh-century manuscript of 296 pages in 2 cols. (360x 270mm). Its codicological composition is unkn

...idore of Seville, the ''Regula pastoralis'' of pope Gregory I and excerpts from his Register, the Rule of St. Benedict and the Exposition of that Rule by S ...he collection. Franz Kerff maintains that the four parts belonged together from the beginning.

...y Ubertus, scribe and later abbot at S. Eutizio in Val Castoriana, not far from Norcia. [{{FM|83}}] ...a B. 11 have approximately the same titles as do the other copies. The Mss Montecassino 125 and Vat. lat. 1339 have numerous marginal and interlinear glosses, the

...ipts listed here are not counted as ''Dionysio-Hadriana'' copies. Only one manuscript unknown to Mordek (and Kéry) was added: [[Paris, Archives nationales, AB X # [[Montecassino, Biblioteca statale del Monumento nazionale di Montecassino, 522]]

...{author|d'Avray}}, and others). Vat. lat. 5845 later came to Montecassino, from where it passed to Rome. ...r|Kéry}}. {{author|Hoskin}}, perhaps following {{author|Kéry}}, treats the manuscript as containing two collections, namely the Dionysiana (p. 151) to which the

...en compiled before 1073/74 because in this year Bernold of Konstanz quoted from it. ...ction draws on a mature version of ''74T''. However, while it is clear the manuscript of the ''Sandionysiana'' was written not before 1065, there is no cogent ev

...xcerpts. The collection has been edited by Kunstmann in 1861 from a single manuscript witness: [[München, BSB, Clm 6242]]. ...al—about 59 canonical rules on various aspects of marriage. In many of the manuscript witnesses, the chapters are numbered, and the title ''De ratione matrimonii

{{Infobox manuscript ...ry}}. A few pages are in Beneventan script, which points to its provenance from Southern Italy, probably Monte Cassino in the early 11th century ({{Author|

...ust have had access to a better form of the collection than the scribes at Montecassino. This rearrangement was made for the monastery Saint-Denis outside Paris fo ...estadio“ (Schlettstadt). A 14th century note describes the contents of the manuscript: „Privilegia ecclesie Beati Dyonisii in Francia“. The first 23 folios c

...in western Germany, specifically Echternach. Earlier attempts to date the manuscript described the script as Italian. ...he council of Meaux (''Meldense''). Apparently the misattribution resulted from the use of this collection by the compiler of the 13L; in both these collec

...rangement. An 11th-century fragment of the beta version is found in the Ms Montecassino, Archivio e Biblioteca dell’Abbazia 297. ...lection is found on fol. 8v–56v and fol. 192r– 196v (the last quire of the manuscript). Confusion regarding the version [{{FM|47}}] this copy represents was app

#[[Montecassino, Archivio dell’Abbazia, 64]]; siglum: Mv # [[Montecassino, Archivio dell’Abbazia, 65]]

...corresponding sort keys. In the left column you will find the title of the manuscript page. This is used to calculate the sortkey. This calculated key can be fou ...nal that everything is OK (i.e., the manual key is intentionally different from the calculated one and should override the choice of the script).

# [[Beauvais, Bibliothèque de la cathédrale, lost manuscript]]: {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections pp. {{Kéry|99}} # [[Catania (from S. Nicolò d’Arena), sine num.]]: {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections pp. {{Ké