Paris, BnF, lat. 3860

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
Library Paris, BnF
Shelfmark lat. 3860
Century saec. XI
Provenance ?
Place of origin Saint-Aubin d’Angers ?
European region of origin Western France
Collection Burchard of Worms, Liber decretorum
Digital Images Gallica
Description at BnF
Author Michela Galli


Manuscript latin 3680 of the Bibliothèque nationale de France is a parchment manuscript from the second half of the 11th century probably produced in the Abbey of Saint-Aubin d'Angers. It contains Burchard's Liber decretorum.

Codicology

The manuscript consists of 139 folios arranged in 18 fascicles, all quaternions except the last one, which consists of three folios. Each fascicle is identified by a number in Roman numerals preceded by a letter Q in the lower margin of the page. It appears to be a large manuscript (375 x 265 mm.) presumably written by a single hand that transcribes the text in an elegant caroline minuscule, placing the text in two columns. Each chapter is introduced by a rubricated title and, placed on the left, by the number of the corresponding chapter. The first words of each chapter and most of the rubricated titles are written in rustic capital.

In the margins, there are references to the texts from which the extract is taken, sometimes framed in brown or red ink.

The iconographic apparatus of the codex is composed of 12 initials introducing books VI to IX (on fol. 65, Liber VII, there is also a cross-shaped consanguinity tree supported by two anthropomorphic figures), and XI to XIX, traced in brown ink with some details in red ink.

Old signatures: Baluze 28; Regius 3887(6).

The information in this paragraph is taken from the description made by Laura Albiero on the page concerning ms. lat. 3860 in the Archives et manuscrits section of the BnF, properly verified, where possible, thanks to the manuscript digitisation on the same site.

Contents

Burchard chapter fol. Significant Variants Literature
I.21 What is found between Cavendum et summopere […] per os dicat Gregorii and Et alibi. Dolens inquit […] diu stare non poterit? The most common texts are:
  • Short version (see editio princeps fol. 3rb): Cur non perpendit, quia benedictio illi in maledictionem converitur.
  • Long version: Cur non videtur, cur non perpenditur [...] fiat hęreticus ordinatur. Et item. Quisquis contra hanc simoniacam […] tantummodo inaniter concupiscit.
 Fowler-Magerl, Fine Distinctions pp. 147–149; Fransen, Montpellier p. 306; Fransen, Valeur p. 6; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 22–23, 33
I.23 Is there an addition after c. 23?
  • In the editio princeps fol. 3va, c. 23 ends ... detestatio ne percussus, and c. 24 begins: Quod non oporteat ordinationes episcoporum diu differri. Quoniam quidam metropolitanorum quantum comperimus ne ...
  • In many Italian copies, c. 23 is followed by Si quis episcopus aut presbiter aut abbas per pecuniam […] et sit anathema sicut Simon Magus a Petro?
 Fransen, Montpellier p. 306
I.234 Are there additions after the end of book one? Normally, the last canon is c. 234 (Quia vero plurimi episcoporum ex aliis […] est in troadam). Three known additions are:
  1. Placet ut in anno bis concilia celebrentur […] assertione promulgabitur (a canon otherwise only known from Collectio XII partium);
  2. Erga simoniacos (an excerpt from JL 4431a, normally ending sanctimus)
  3. Fraterne mortis (JL †6613a)
 Dusil, Wissensordnungen p. 257 n. 258
II.18 to 24 Commonly, c. 23 (De rebus vero illorum vel peculiari) is displaced, so that the sequence of canons is "18, 23, 19-22, 24". See fol. 36r-36v of the editio princeps for the standard sequence. Fransen, Montpellier pp. 301, 307; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 33–34; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten p. 135
End of book II See fol. 54r of the editio princeps for the ending of book two („Wormser Ordnung Typ A“).
III.15 Is there an addition after c. 15 (see fol. 58r of the editio princeps), namely an excerpt from JE 1317 beginning Pervenit ad me quod and ending per clericorum ambitum destruantur? Fransen, Montpellier p. 306; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 44–45
End of book III Is there a synodal order added after book three? The most common one is Schneider's Ordo 5 but there is considerable variety, as Schneider's discussion of the individual ordines makes clear. See fol. 81 of the editio princeps for the ending of book three („Wormser Ordnung Typ A“). Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 6–7, 14; Schneider MHG Ordines pp. 31-37; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 43; Hoffmann/Pokorny, Dekret pp. 41–45
VIII.38 While "German" copies (and Parma, Biblioteca Palatina, 3777) have the complete chapter (Si quis sacro uelamine consecratam in -- sine spe coniugii maneat), many deteriores break off with cohabitare tecto, followed by spatium or not. Sometimes, the missing text is added by a later hand; sometimes, c. 38 is merged with c. 49, or followed directly by c. 50. See fol. 117v-118r of the editio princeps for c. 38, fol. 118r for c. 39, and fol. 119v for cc. 49-50. Fransen, Montpellier p. 303–304; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 9–10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
VIII.49-50 Deteriores copies typically lack cc. 39-48; c. 49 may be incomplete or missing altogether. Sometimes, the two fragmentary canons cc. 38 and 49 are merged into one (grammatically disturbed) canon. See fol. 118r-119v of the editio princeps for a complete series of cc. 39-50. Fransen, Montpellier p. 303–304; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 9–10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
XII.9 In the deteriores copies, c. 9 ends with similiter peniteat. Sin autem (note that in copies like London, BL, Cotton Claudius C.vi, the sin autem is missing too). Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten pp. 137-138, 155
XII.10-20 Most copies which break off in c. 9 with sin autem also lack cc. 10-20. Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten pp. 137-138, 155
XII.29 The canon is transmitted in a number of variants:
  • The phrase et post paululum is sometimes replaced by other words
  • de iepte discernens
  • What is the wording between asserendi copia profluus and hęc in suis narrat affectibus?
  • What is the wording between in malis promissis rescinde fidem and quod incaute novisti non facias. (One Italian branch here reads eloquentię fructu fecundus).
 Fransen, Montpellier p. 304; Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 12–13, 15–18; Hoffmann/Pokorny, Dekret pp. 61, 63–64
XIX.108 In deteriores copies, book 19 ends here. Fransen, Montpellier pp. 304–305; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10–11, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
XX.57 In deteriores copies, book 20 ends with c. 57. Sometimes the missing canons are added by a later hand and/or other additions are found here, including JE †1996, JE 1362, and JK 744. Fransen, Montpellier p. 305; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 11; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
After book 20 The canons of Seligenstadt are found in several Burchard copies, most commonly after the last book of the Liber. Jasper has disinguished two recensions, see his account in MGH Conc. 8. Rolker, Letters p. 112.- Jasper, MGH Conc. 8 pp. 24-26.

Links

Literature

Kéry, Collections p. 136, 145, 148; Jasper, MGH Conc. 8 pp 20.


Retrieved from "https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php?title=Paris,_BnF,_lat._3860&oldid=38720"