Toulouse, BM, 364: Difference between revisions
mNo edit summary |
(Inserted Infobox) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Toulouse, BM, 364 (''olim'' I. 63; "Cod. Tolos. B 63" in Maassen) and [[Paris, BnF, lat. 8901]] are a copy of the [[Collectio Albigensis]] written before 666/667. According to {{author|Loew}}, [[Albi, BM, 2]] was a faithful copy of this manuscript; hence the subscriptio preserved there (on fol. 17r) actually refers to the making of the Toulouse manuscript: it was written by a certain Perpetuus at the request of Bishop Dido of Albi (CLA VI 836). As Dido is not attested otherwise, the date is disputed. Maassen, based on the reference to King Childeric in the subscriptio, dated it to 673, the year he (wrongly) assumed Childerich II died. Turner tought a date between 626 and 666 most likely while Ourliac assumed the manuscript was written ca. 600. | {{Infobox manuscript | ||
| library = Toulouse, BM | |||
| shelfmark = 364 | |||
| descriptionat = [https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc1116675/cN100781 archivesetmanuscrits.bnf] | |||
| digitalimages = [https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10560139j gallica.bnf] | |||
| bischoffnumber = - on p. - | |||
| author1 = Kéry | |||
| normregion = Southern France | |||
| generalregion = Southern Europe and Mediterranean | |||
| coll = Collectio Albigensis | |||
| century = saec VII | |||
| clanumber = [https://elmss.nuigalway.ie/catalogue/1251 CLA VI 836] | |||
}}Toulouse, BM, 364 (''olim'' I. 63; "Cod. Tolos. B 63" in Maassen) and [[Paris, BnF, lat. 8901]] are a copy of the [[Collectio Albigensis]] written before 666/667. According to {{author|Loew}}, [[Albi, BM, 2]] was a faithful copy of this manuscript; hence the subscriptio preserved there (on fol. 17r) actually refers to the making of the Toulouse manuscript: it was written by a certain Perpetuus at the request of Bishop Dido of Albi (CLA VI 836). As Dido is not attested otherwise, the date is disputed. Maassen, based on the reference to King Childeric in the subscriptio, dated it to 673, the year he (wrongly) assumed Childerich II died. Turner tought a date between 626 and 666 most likely while Ourliac assumed the manuscript was written ca. 600. | |||
The Toulouse manuscript (incomplete at the beginning and the end) today has 107 folios and contains the Albigensis from the Council of Gangres (fol. 1-2) to a letter of Leo I (JK 318) and "capitula sancti Augustini" apparently ending on fol. 107. | The Toulouse manuscript (incomplete at the beginning and the end) today has 107 folios and contains the Albigensis from the Council of Gangres (fol. 1-2) to a letter of Leo I (JK 318) and "capitula sancti Augustini" apparently ending on fol. 107. | ||
Revision as of 22:55, 9 January 2025
| Library | Toulouse, BM |
|---|---|
| Shelfmark | 364 |
| Century | saec VII |
| European region of origin | Southern France |
| General region of origin | Southern Europe and Mediterranean |
| Collection | Collectio Albigensis |
| Digital Images | gallica.bnf |
| Description at | archivesetmanuscrits.bnf |
| CLA volume and number with ELMSS link | CLA VI 836 |
| Bischoff number and value | - on p. - |
| Main author | Kéry |
Toulouse, BM, 364 (olim I. 63; "Cod. Tolos. B 63" in Maassen) and Paris, BnF, lat. 8901 are a copy of the Collectio Albigensis written before 666/667. According to Loew, Albi, BM, 2 was a faithful copy of this manuscript; hence the subscriptio preserved there (on fol. 17r) actually refers to the making of the Toulouse manuscript: it was written by a certain Perpetuus at the request of Bishop Dido of Albi (CLA VI 836). As Dido is not attested otherwise, the date is disputed. Maassen, based on the reference to King Childeric in the subscriptio, dated it to 673, the year he (wrongly) assumed Childerich II died. Turner tought a date between 626 and 666 most likely while Ourliac assumed the manuscript was written ca. 600.
The Toulouse manuscript (incomplete at the beginning and the end) today has 107 folios and contains the Albigensis from the Council of Gangres (fol. 1-2) to a letter of Leo I (JK 318) and "capitula sancti Augustini" apparently ending on fol. 107.
The part of the manuscript today in Paris (nine folios) had been stolen by Count Libri (CLA).
Links
- online: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10560139j
- description: https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc1116675/cN100781
- CLA VI 836 https://elmss.nuigalway.ie/catalogue/1251
Literature
Maassen, Geschichte pp. 592; Turner, A Group of MSS of Canons at Toulouse, Albi and Paris, JTS 2 (1900-1901) 266-267; CLA 6, no. 836, pp. 39 and 48; CLA Suppl. p. 58; Ourliac, Manuscrit toulousain p. 54; Kéry, Collections p. 47
