Canones Apostolorum: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Text replacement - "Category:Collection]]" to "Category:Canonical Collection]]")
No edit summary
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 15: Line 15:
However, Dionysus already had reservations about the validity of the Canones Apostolorum, and the Decretum Gelasianum categorised them as apocryphal writings.  
However, Dionysus already had reservations about the validity of the Canones Apostolorum, and the Decretum Gelasianum categorised them as apocryphal writings.  


== Categories ==
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]] [[Category:Canonical Collection]]
* not in Clavis [[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]] [[Category:Canonical Collection]]
[[Category:very small (less than 100 canons) collection]]   
* very small (less than 100 canons) collection  [[Category:very small (less than 100 canons) collection]]   
[[Category:Collection from Southern Europe and Mediterranean]]  
* from Syria [[Category:Collection from Southern Europe and Mediterranean]]  
[[Category:Collection saec IV]]
* saec. IV [[Category:Collection saec IV]]
[[Category:Stub]]
* article is a stub [[Category:Stub]]

Latest revision as of 11:13, 11 December 2024

Title Canones Apostolorum
Key ?
Wikidata Item no. Q2385311
Size Very small (less than 100 canons)
Century saec. IV
General region of origin Southern Europe and Mediterranean
Main author Christof Rolker


The Canones Apostolorum are a small canonical collection that probably originated in Syria in the fourth century and were widely distributed in various translations (Greek, Syriac, Arabic, Ethiopian, Latin).

The 85 canons deal with questions of church discipline, predominantly in relation to the clergy. The last canon contains a list of the canonical books of the Bible. In the Eastern Churches, the Canones Apostolorum have been a recognised source of canon law since the Quinisextum at the latest. In the Western Church, the first 50 canons were known in a Latin translation by Dionysus Exiguus, who also included them in his collection (the Dionysiana), from where they were adopted in many medieval collections of canon law.

However, Dionysus already had reservations about the validity of the Canones Apostolorum, and the Decretum Gelasianum categorised them as apocryphal writings.