Pseudoisidore C: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Typo)
m (Text replacement - "Category:Collection]]" to "Category:Canonical Collection]]")
Line 7: Line 7:
See the main article [[Pseudoisidore, False Decretals]]
See the main article [[Pseudoisidore, False Decretals]]


[[Category:Collection]]
[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]
[[Category:Articles that lack an infobox]]  
[[Category:Articles that lack an infobox]]  

Revision as of 03:33, 10 August 2024

The C recension of the False Decretals is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the A/B recension. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen Patzold has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.

Contents

The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the A1 recension is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the Quesnelliana (Knibbs). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to Patzold also include the Collectio Corbeiensis (for one letter), the Collectio Bobbiensis, and the Collectio Grimanica.

Editions and Literature

See the main article Pseudoisidore, False Decretals