Collectio Remensis: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Text replacement - "Collectio Dionysiana prima" to "Collectio Dionysiana I")
m (Text replacement - "Category:Collection]]" to "Category:Canonical Collection]]")
 
(25 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
This chronologically arranged collection mostly consists of synodal acts and papal letters/decretals. The collection is solely preserved in [https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Berlin,_Staatsbibliothek_zu_Berlin_%E2%80%93_Preussischer_Kulturbesitz,_Phillippicus_1743 Berlin, Staatsbibliothek zu Berlin – Preussischer Kulturbesitz, Phillippicus 1743]. The ''Collectio Remensis'' contains Greek (Ancyra, Neocesarea, Gangra, Antioch, Laodicea, Constantinople I [in two versions], Sardica, Ephesus, Chalcedon), African (Carthage 419, ''Registri ecclesiae Carthaginensis excerpta''), Roman (the three synods held under Pope Symmachus) and twenty-two Gallican synods (earliest: Arles 314, latest: Paris 614), as well as twenty-seven papal letters (by Pseudo-Clement, Siricius, Innocent I, Zosimus, Celestine I, Leo I, Gelasius I, Symmachus, Hormisda, John II, Vigilius). In addition, the ''Collectio Remensis'' contains a couple of various pieces not fitting into either category, e.g. the ''Liber ecclesiasticorum dogmatum'', the ''Decretum Gelasianum'', a letter by the Milanese clergy to Frankish envoys (pertaining to the Three-Chapter Controversy), and the Paris edict of the Frankish king Chlothar II (from 614) – the latter two documents are preserved solely in Phill. 1743.
{{Infobox collection
    | title  = Collectio Remensis
    | alttitle = Sammlung der Handschrift von Rheims
    | century = saec. VI
    | author1 = [[User:TStueber]]
}}


From the ninth century at the latest, the ms. was preserved at St-Remi-de-Reims, hence the misleading name of the collection, which has nothing to do with the place of its composition. As can be shown from the contents and a couple of editorial amendments, the collection was originally composed in south-eastern Gaul, its earliest recension not written long after 550. The original collection then underwent a number of editorial changes sometime in the second half of the sixth century and was finally – not earlier than the 620s – supplemented by several documents belonging to the time of Chlothar II (d. 629/30). The collection draws from different sources, such as the so-called ''Corpus Africano-Romanum'' (H. Mordek, Karthago oder Rom? Zu den Anfängen der kirchlichen Rechtsquellen im Abendland, in: Studia in Honorem A. M. Stickler [1992], 359-374), the ''Collectio Teatina'', the [[Collectio Dionysiana I|''Collectio Dionysiana'' ''prima'']] and the ''Canones urbicani'' ({{Author|Wurm}}, Studien 116-118).
This chronologically arranged collection, "the largest we have from the Merovingian period" ({{Author|Eber}} et al., Selection , p. [https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110757279-008 111], mostly consists of synodal acts and papal letters/decretals. The collection is solely preserved in [[Berlin, SBPK, Phill. 1743]]. The ''Collectio Remensis'' contains Greek (Ancyra, Neocesarea, Gangra, Antioch, Laodicea, Constantinople I [in two versions], Sardica, Ephesus, Chalcedon), African (Carthage 419, ''Registri ecclesiae Carthaginensis excerpta''), Roman (the three synods held under Pope Symmachus) and twenty-two Gallican synods (earliest: Arles 314, latest: Paris 614), as well as twenty-seven papal letters (by Pseudo-Clement, Siricius, Innocent I, Zosimus, Celestine I, Leo I, Gelasius I, Symmachus, Hormisda, John II, Vigilius). In addition, the ''Collectio Remensis'' contains a couple of various pieces not fitting into either category, e.g. the ''Liber ecclesiasticorum dogmatum'', the ''Decretum Gelasianum'', a letter by the Milanese clergy to Frankish envoys (pertaining to the Three-Chapter Controversy), and the Paris edict of the Frankish king Chlothar II (from 614) – the latter two documents are preserved solely in Phill. 1743.
 
From the ninth century at the latest, the ms. was preserved at St-Remi-de-Reims, hence the misleading name of the collection, which has nothing to do with the place of its composition. As can be shown from the contents and a couple of editorial amendments, the collection was originally composed in south-eastern Gaul, its earliest recension not written long after 550. The original collection then underwent a number of editorial changes sometime in the second half of the sixth century and was finally – not earlier than the 620s – supplemented by several documents belonging to the time of Chlothar II (d. 629/30). The collection draws from different sources, such as the so-called ''[[Corpus canonum Africano-Romanum]]'', the ''[[Collectio Teatina]]'', the ''[[Collectio Dionysiana I]]'' and the ''[[Canones urbicani]]'' ({{Author|Wurm}}, Studien pp. 116-118).
   
   
In its different recensions, the ''Collectio Remensis'' served as a source (fons formalis) to other Gallican canonical collections, viz. the ''Collectio Diessensis'', ''Collectio Pithouensis'', [[Collectio_Sancti_Amandi|''Collectio Sancti Amandi'']], and, via the latter, the ''Collectio Bellovacensis''. It was also one of the sources of the fourth part of the ''[[Quadripartitus]]''.
In its different recensions, the ''Collectio Remensis'' served as a source (''fons formalis'') to other Gallican canonical collections, viz. the ''[[Collectio Diessensis]]'', ''[[Collectio Pithouensis]]'', ''[[Collectio Sancti Amandi]]'', and, via the latter, the ''[[Collectio Bellovacensis]]''. It was also one of the sources of the fourth part of the ''[[Quadripartitus]]''.


A digitized version of the codex unicus is planned to be made available online on https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de
A digitized version of the codex unicus is planned to be made available online on https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de
== The manuscript ==
See [[:Category:Manuscript of Collectio Remensis]] ({{PAGESINCATEGORY:Manuscript of Collectio Remensis}} entry)
* [[Berlin, SBPK, Phill. 1743]]


== Literature ==
== Literature ==
Older literature is listed in {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kery|50}}. See additionally Klaus {{Author|Zechiel-Eckes}}, Die erste Dekretale. Der Brief Papst Siricius’ an Bischof Himerius von Tarragona vom Jahr 385 (JK 255). Aus dem Nachlass mit Ergänzungen hg. von D. Jasper (2013), p. 46f. On the links to the ''Collectio Sancti Amandi'', see Michael {{Author|Eber}}, Stefan {{Author|Esders}}, David {{Author|Ganz}} and Till {{Author|Stüber}}, Selection and Presentation of Texts in Early Medieval Canon Law Collections. Approaching the Codex Remensis (Berlin, Staatsbibliothek, Phill. 1743), in: Creative Selection between Emending and Forming Medieval Memory, ed. Sebastian Scholz and Gerald Schwedler (Millennium-Studien 96, 2022), pp. 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110757279-008 On its reception in the Quadripartitus, see {{Author|Kerff}}, Quadripartitus pp. 61f. On the collection’s relation to the Three-Chapters Controversy, see Michael {{Author|Eber}}, Christologie und Kanonistik. Der Dreikapitelstreit in merowingischen ''libri canonum'' (MGH Schriften 82, 2023; see [https://www.mgh.de/en/blog/post/michael-eber-christologie-und-kanonistik here]), on its genesis and reception in other canonical collections, see the monograph of Till {{Author|Stüber}}, forthcoming.


Older literature is listed in {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections 50, see additionally Klaus Zechiel-Eckes, Die erste Dekretale. Der Brief Papst Siricius’ an Bischof Himerius von Tarragona vom Jahr 385 (JK 255). Aus dem Nachlass mit Ergänzungen hg. von D. Jasper (2013), p. 46f. On the links to the ''Collectio Sancti Amandi'', see Michael Eber, Stefan Esders, David Ganz and Till Stüber, Selection and Presentation of Texts in Early Medieval Canon Law Collections. Approaching the Codex Remensis (Berlin, Staatsbibliothek, Phill. 1743), in: Creative Selection between Emending and Forming Medieval Memory, ed. Sebastian Scholz and Gerald Schwedler (Millennium-Studien 96, 2022), 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110757279-008 On its reception in the Quadripartitus, see {{Author|Kerff}}, Quadripartitus 61f. On the collection’s relation to the Three-Chapters Controversy, see Michael Eber, Christologie und Kanonistik. Der Dreikapitelstreit in merowingischen ''libri canonum'' (MGH Schriften, forthcoming), on its genesis and reception in other canonical collections, see the monograph of Till Stüber, forthcoming.
== Categories ==
 
* Collection [[Category:Canonical Collection]]
=== Categories ===
* not in Clavis [[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]
* not in Clavis [[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]
* saec. VI 2/2 [[Category:Collection saec VI]]
* from Gaul [[Category:Collection from Southern France]]
* this article is a stub [[Category:Stub]]

Latest revision as of 22:27, 8 August 2024

Title Collectio Remensis
Key ?
Alternative title Sammlung der Handschrift von Rheims
Century saec. VI
Main author User:TStueber


This chronologically arranged collection, "the largest we have from the Merovingian period" (Eber et al., Selection , p. 111, mostly consists of synodal acts and papal letters/decretals. The collection is solely preserved in Berlin, SBPK, Phill. 1743. The Collectio Remensis contains Greek (Ancyra, Neocesarea, Gangra, Antioch, Laodicea, Constantinople I [in two versions], Sardica, Ephesus, Chalcedon), African (Carthage 419, Registri ecclesiae Carthaginensis excerpta), Roman (the three synods held under Pope Symmachus) and twenty-two Gallican synods (earliest: Arles 314, latest: Paris 614), as well as twenty-seven papal letters (by Pseudo-Clement, Siricius, Innocent I, Zosimus, Celestine I, Leo I, Gelasius I, Symmachus, Hormisda, John II, Vigilius). In addition, the Collectio Remensis contains a couple of various pieces not fitting into either category, e.g. the Liber ecclesiasticorum dogmatum, the Decretum Gelasianum, a letter by the Milanese clergy to Frankish envoys (pertaining to the Three-Chapter Controversy), and the Paris edict of the Frankish king Chlothar II (from 614) – the latter two documents are preserved solely in Phill. 1743.

From the ninth century at the latest, the ms. was preserved at St-Remi-de-Reims, hence the misleading name of the collection, which has nothing to do with the place of its composition. As can be shown from the contents and a couple of editorial amendments, the collection was originally composed in south-eastern Gaul, its earliest recension not written long after 550. The original collection then underwent a number of editorial changes sometime in the second half of the sixth century and was finally – not earlier than the 620s – supplemented by several documents belonging to the time of Chlothar II (d. 629/30). The collection draws from different sources, such as the so-called Corpus canonum Africano-Romanum, the Collectio Teatina, the Collectio Dionysiana I and the Canones urbicani (Wurm, Studien pp. 116-118).

In its different recensions, the Collectio Remensis served as a source (fons formalis) to other Gallican canonical collections, viz. the Collectio Diessensis, Collectio Pithouensis, Collectio Sancti Amandi, and, via the latter, the Collectio Bellovacensis. It was also one of the sources of the fourth part of the Quadripartitus.

A digitized version of the codex unicus is planned to be made available online on https://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de

The manuscript

See Category:Manuscript of Collectio Remensis (1 entry)

Literature

Older literature is listed in Kéry, Collections p. 50. See additionally Klaus Zechiel-Eckes, Die erste Dekretale. Der Brief Papst Siricius’ an Bischof Himerius von Tarragona vom Jahr 385 (JK 255). Aus dem Nachlass mit Ergänzungen hg. von D. Jasper (2013), p. 46f. On the links to the Collectio Sancti Amandi, see Michael Eber, Stefan Esders, David Ganz and Till Stüber, Selection and Presentation of Texts in Early Medieval Canon Law Collections. Approaching the Codex Remensis (Berlin, Staatsbibliothek, Phill. 1743), in: Creative Selection between Emending and Forming Medieval Memory, ed. Sebastian Scholz and Gerald Schwedler (Millennium-Studien 96, 2022), pp. 105–136. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110757279-008 On its reception in the Quadripartitus, see Kerff, Quadripartitus pp. 61f. On the collection’s relation to the Three-Chapters Controversy, see Michael Eber, Christologie und Kanonistik. Der Dreikapitelstreit in merowingischen libri canonum (MGH Schriften 82, 2023; see here), on its genesis and reception in other canonical collections, see the monograph of Till Stüber, forthcoming.

Categories

  • Collection
  • not in Clavis
  • saec. VI 2/2
  • from Gaul
  • this article is a stub