Città del Vaticano, BAV, Vat. lat. 5845: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Christof Rolker moved page Città del Vaticano, BAV, lat. 5845 to Città del Vaticano, BAV, Vat. lat. 5845: correct shelf mark)
(merging the two articles on Vat.lat. 5845)
Line 1: Line 1:
Città del Vaticano, BAV, Vat. lat. 5845, written in Southern Italy in the tenth century contains a variety of canon law materials. It is probably best known as one of only two medieval copies of the Dionysiana including the [[Liber decretorum Dionysii]].
Città del Vaticano, BAV, Vat. lat. 5845, written in Southern Italy in the tenth century contains a variety of canon law materials. It is probably best known as one of only two medieval copies of the Dionysiana including the [[Liber decretorum Dionysii]]. In fact, Vat. lat. 5845 and [[Paris, BnF, lat. 3837]] are the only manuscripts which scholars since {{author|Maassen}} (Geschichte pp. {{Maassen|431}}-432) agree that they contain both the collection of synodal canons of [[Dionysiana II]] and the decretals part.


According to {{author|Lowe}}, Beneventan script pp. [https://archive.org/details/beneventanscript00loweuoft/page/53/mode/1up 53]-54. the codex was written in Capua by monks from Montecassino who had fled there. {{author|Mordek}}, Kirchenrecht p. 59 n. 94, the codex was written between 915 and 934 at Capua. Mirabile mixes both accounts.
== Origin of the codex ==
According to {{author|Lowe}}, Beneventan script pp. [https://archive.org/details/beneventanscript00loweuoft/page/53/mode/1up 53]-54. the codex was written in Capua by monks from Montecassino who had fled there. According to {{author|Mordek}}, Kirchenrecht p. 59 n. 94 (and {{author|Wirbelauer}}), the codex was written between 915 and 934 at Capua. It later came to Montecassino, from where it passed to Rome.


== Loss of leaves ==
The codex is physically incomplete: the first two quires and the outside leaves of the third are missing; what is today fol. 1 begins in the middle of the rubrics to the Canones Apostolorum. Bertram/Dolezalek report more missing folios.
== The collection(s) contained in Vat. lat. 5845 ==
Bertram/Dolezalek describe it as an imperfect and expanded version of the [[Collectio Dionysiana II]]:
Bertram/Dolezalek describe it as an imperfect and expanded version of the [[Collectio Dionysiana II]]:
: fol. 1ra-200vb, 202ra-306va, 313ra-327rb <Collectio Dionysiana, recensio 2, imperfecta et cum additionibus>
: fol. 1ra-200vb, 202ra-306va, 313ra-327rb <Collectio Dionysiana, recensio 2, imperfecta et cum additionibus>
According to them, many of the additions are also found in the [[Collectio Dionysiana adaucta]] but others not; some additions found in Vat. lat. 5845 are also found in the [[Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana]].  
According to them, many of the additions are also found in the [[Collectio Dionysiana adaucta]] but others not; some additions found in Vat. lat. 5845 are also found in the [[Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana]].  
The codex is physically incomplete: the first two quires and the outside leaves of the third are missing; what is today fol. 1 begins in the middle of the rubrics to the Canones Apostolorum. Bertram/Dolezalek report more missing folios.


{{author|Maassen}} p. {{Maassen|454}} did ''not'' count Vat. lat. 5845 among the four copies of the [[Dionysiana adaucta]] (his "vermehrte Hadriana"). While he refers to it in the discussion of this collection (mainly stressing similarities to Clm 14008), he sees it as a "pure" Dionysiana which was added to with material also added to the [[Dionysio-Hadriana]] (pp. {{Maassen|450}}, {{Maassen|455}}, {{Maassen|464}})
{{author|Maassen}} p. {{Maassen|454}} did ''not'' count Vat. lat. 5845 among the four copies of the [[Dionysiana adaucta]] (his "vermehrte Hadriana"). While he refers to it in the discussion of this collection (mainly stressing similarities to Clm 14008), he sees it as a "pure" Dionysiana which was added to with material also added to the [[Dionysio-Hadriana]] (pp. {{Maassen|450}}, {{Maassen|455}}, {{Maassen|464}})
{{author|Landau}}, Kanonessammlungen Lombardei pp. 430-431 in his discussion of the Dionysiana adaucta does not mention Vat. lat. 5845
{{author|Landau}}, Kanonessammlungen Lombardei pp. 430-431 in his discussion of the Dionysiana adaucta does not mention Vat. lat. 5845. {{author|Landau}}, Gefälschtes Recht p. 19 seems to treat Vat. lat. 5845 as a copy of the Dionysiana II but ''not'' the Dionysiana adaucta:
{{author|Landau}}, Gefälschtes Recht p. 19 seems to treat Vat. lat. 5845 as a copy of the Dionysiana II but ''not'' the Dionysiana adaucta:
:Ferner sind alle Texte der symmachianischen Fälschungen in der Collectio Vaticana (Vat. lat. 1342) überliefert, außerdem in den Codices der sog. Vermehrten Hadriana in der Terminologie Maassens - besser Dionysiana adaucta - und schließlich im Codex Vat. lat. 5845 der Dionysiana in der 2. Redaktion.
:Ferner sind alle Texte der symmachianischen Fälschungen in der Collectio Vaticana (Vat. lat. 1342) überliefert, außerdem in den Codices der sog. Vermehrten Hadriana in der Terminologie Maassens - besser Dionysiana adaucta - und schließlich im Codex Vat. lat. 5845 der Dionysiana in der 2. Redaktion.
{{author|Wirbelauer}}, Zwei Päpste pp. 219-220 describes Vat.lat. 5845 (his '''V<sub>3</sub>''') as containing onyl one collection, namely a Dionysiana II, with additions very similiar to those in [[München, BSB, Clm 14008]], his '''M<sub>2</sub>''' ("Coll. Dionysiana II mit dem Anhang, der sich nächstverwandt in M<sub>2</sub> findet"). {{author|Kéry}} lists the manuscript as a copy of the Dionysiana II (p. 10), the Liber decretorum Dionysii (p. 11), and the Dionysiana adaucta (p. 21). {{author|Hoskin}} treats the manuscript as containing two collections, namely the Dionysiana (p. 151) to which the Dionysiana adaucta was "appended" (p. 301).  
{{author|Wirbelauer}}, Zwei Päpste pp. 219-220 describes Vat.lat. 5845 (his '''V<sub>3</sub>''') as containing only one collection, namely a Dionysiana II, with additions very similiar to those in [[München, BSB, Clm 14008]], his '''M<sub>2</sub>''' ("Coll. Dionysiana II mit dem Anhang, der sich nächstverwandt in M<sub>2</sub> findet"). {{author|Kéry}} lists the manuscript as a copy of the Dionysiana II (p. 10), the Liber decretorum Dionysii (p. 11), and the Dionysiana adaucta (p. 21). The Clavis handbook seems to cite it as a copy of the [[Collectio Dionysiana adaucta]] only: {{Author|Fowler-Magerl}}, Clavis canonum p. {{FM|45}}. {{author|Hoskin}} treats the manuscript as containing two collections, namely the Dionysiana (p. 151) to which the Dionysiana adaucta was "appended" (p. 301).  


== Links ==
== Links ==
Line 24: Line 26:
The codex has been used by a number of scholars (Holste, Ballerini, Thiel, von Dobschütz, Schwartz, ...).
The codex has been used by a number of scholars (Holste, Ballerini, Thiel, von Dobschütz, Schwartz, ...).


{{Author|Maassen}}, Geschichte pp. {{Maassen|427}}, {{Maassen|431}}, {{Maassen|435}}, {{Maassen|449}}-451, and {{Maassen|464}}; {{Author|Kéry}}, p. {{Kéry|10}}-11, {{Kéry|21}}
{{Author|Maassen}}, Geschichte pp. {{Maassen|427}}, {{Maassen|431}}, {{Maassen|435}}, {{Maassen|449}}-451, and {{Maassen|464}}; {{Author|Loew}}, Beneventan Script pp. [https://archive.org/details/beneventanscript00loweuoft/page/54/mode/1up 54] and [https://archive.org/details/beneventanscript00loweuoft/page/69/mode/1up 69]; {{Author|Kéry}}, pp. {{Kéry|10}}-11 and {{Kéry|21}}; {{Author|Zechiel-Eckes}}, Die erste Dekretale, 51; {{author|d'Avray}}, Papal Jurisprudence pp. 30-40.
 


{{DEFAULTSORT:Vaticano, BAV, Vat. lat. 05845}}


[[Category:Manuscript]]
[[Category:Manuscript]]
Line 33: Line 37:
[[Category:Manuscript of Collectio Dionysiana adaucta]]
[[Category:Manuscript of Collectio Dionysiana adaucta]]
[[Category:Stub]]
[[Category:Stub]]
[[Category:Manuscript of DX]]
[[Category:Manuscript of DY]]

Revision as of 13:48, 6 August 2024

Città del Vaticano, BAV, Vat. lat. 5845, written in Southern Italy in the tenth century contains a variety of canon law materials. It is probably best known as one of only two medieval copies of the Dionysiana including the Liber decretorum Dionysii. In fact, Vat. lat. 5845 and Paris, BnF, lat. 3837 are the only manuscripts which scholars since Maassen (Geschichte pp. 431-432) agree that they contain both the collection of synodal canons of Dionysiana II and the decretals part.

Origin of the codex

According to Lowe, Beneventan script pp. 53-54. the codex was written in Capua by monks from Montecassino who had fled there. According to Mordek, Kirchenrecht p. 59 n. 94 (and Wirbelauer), the codex was written between 915 and 934 at Capua. It later came to Montecassino, from where it passed to Rome.

Loss of leaves

The codex is physically incomplete: the first two quires and the outside leaves of the third are missing; what is today fol. 1 begins in the middle of the rubrics to the Canones Apostolorum. Bertram/Dolezalek report more missing folios.

The collection(s) contained in Vat. lat. 5845

Bertram/Dolezalek describe it as an imperfect and expanded version of the Collectio Dionysiana II:

fol. 1ra-200vb, 202ra-306va, 313ra-327rb <Collectio Dionysiana, recensio 2, imperfecta et cum additionibus>

According to them, many of the additions are also found in the Collectio Dionysiana adaucta but others not; some additions found in Vat. lat. 5845 are also found in the Collectio Dionysio-Hadriana.

Maassen p. 454 did not count Vat. lat. 5845 among the four copies of the Dionysiana adaucta (his "vermehrte Hadriana"). While he refers to it in the discussion of this collection (mainly stressing similarities to Clm 14008), he sees it as a "pure" Dionysiana which was added to with material also added to the Dionysio-Hadriana (pp. 450, 455, 464) Landau, Kanonessammlungen Lombardei pp. 430-431 in his discussion of the Dionysiana adaucta does not mention Vat. lat. 5845. Landau, Gefälschtes Recht p. 19 seems to treat Vat. lat. 5845 as a copy of the Dionysiana II but not the Dionysiana adaucta:

Ferner sind alle Texte der symmachianischen Fälschungen in der Collectio Vaticana (Vat. lat. 1342) überliefert, außerdem in den Codices der sog. Vermehrten Hadriana in der Terminologie Maassens - besser Dionysiana adaucta - und schließlich im Codex Vat. lat. 5845 der Dionysiana in der 2. Redaktion.

Wirbelauer, Zwei Päpste pp. 219-220 describes Vat.lat. 5845 (his V3) as containing only one collection, namely a Dionysiana II, with additions very similiar to those in München, BSB, Clm 14008, his M2 ("Coll. Dionysiana II mit dem Anhang, der sich nächstverwandt in M2 findet"). Kéry lists the manuscript as a copy of the Dionysiana II (p. 10), the Liber decretorum Dionysii (p. 11), and the Dionysiana adaucta (p. 21). The Clavis handbook seems to cite it as a copy of the Collectio Dionysiana adaucta only: Fowler-Magerl, Clavis canonum p. 45. Hoskin treats the manuscript as containing two collections, namely the Dionysiana (p. 151) to which the Dionysiana adaucta was "appended" (p. 301).

Links

Literature

The codex has been used by a number of scholars (Holste, Ballerini, Thiel, von Dobschütz, Schwartz, ...).

Maassen, Geschichte pp. 427, 431, 435, 449-451, and 464; Loew, Beneventan Script pp. 54 and 69; Kéry, pp. 10-11 and 21; Zechiel-Eckes, Die erste Dekretale, 51; d'Avray, Papal Jurisprudence pp. 30-40.

Retrieved from "https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php?title=Città_del_Vaticano,_BAV,_Vat._lat._5845&oldid=9384"