Toulouse, BM, 364: Difference between revisions
(additions from CLA) |
(additions from CLA) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Toulouse, BM, 364 (''olim'' I. 63) and [[Paris, BnF, lat. 8901]] are a copy of the [[Collectio Albigensis]] written before 666/667 | Toulouse, BM, 364 (''olim'' I. 63) and [[Paris, BnF, lat. 8901]] are a copy of the [[Collectio Albigensis]] written before 666/667. According to the subscription lost in the manuscript but preserved in a tenth-century copy [[Albi, BM, 2]], fol. 17r it was written by a certain Perpetuus at the request of Bishop Dido of Albi (CLA VI 836). | ||
The Toulouse manuscript has 107 folios and contains the Albigensis from the Council of Gangres (fol. 1-2) to a letter of Leo I (JK 318) and "capitula sancti Augustini" apparently ending on fol. 107. | |||
The same subscription provides the terminus ante quem. The terminus ad quem is disputed; {{author|Loew}} thought saec. VIImed (i.e. between 626 and 666) most likelt, Ourliac assumed the mansucript was written ca. 600. | |||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
| Line 7: | Line 11: | ||
== Literature == | == Literature == | ||
CLA 6, no. 836, pp. 39 and 48; CLA Suppl. p. 58, cf. {{Author|Ourliac}}, Manuscrit toulousain p. 54 | CLA 6, no. 836, pp. 39 and 48; CLA Suppl. p. 58, cf. {{Author|Ourliac}}, Manuscrit toulousain p. 54; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|47}} | ||
== Categories == | == Categories == | ||
Revision as of 19:43, 1 July 2024
Toulouse, BM, 364 (olim I. 63) and Paris, BnF, lat. 8901 are a copy of the Collectio Albigensis written before 666/667. According to the subscription lost in the manuscript but preserved in a tenth-century copy Albi, BM, 2, fol. 17r it was written by a certain Perpetuus at the request of Bishop Dido of Albi (CLA VI 836).
The Toulouse manuscript has 107 folios and contains the Albigensis from the Council of Gangres (fol. 1-2) to a letter of Leo I (JK 318) and "capitula sancti Augustini" apparently ending on fol. 107.
The same subscription provides the terminus ante quem. The terminus ad quem is disputed; Loew thought saec. VIImed (i.e. between 626 and 666) most likelt, Ourliac assumed the mansucript was written ca. 600.
Links
- online: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10560139j
- description: https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc1116675/cN100781
- CLA VI 836 https://elmss.nuigalway.ie/catalogue/1251
Literature
CLA 6, no. 836, pp. 39 and 48; CLA Suppl. p. 58, cf. Ourliac, Manuscrit toulousain p. 54; Kéry, Collections p. 47
Categories
- Manuscript
- saec VII
- digitized
- from Southern France
- copy of Collectio Albigensis
