Liber decretorum Dionysii: Difference between revisions
Tag: Reverted |
|||
Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
== Contents == | == Contents == | ||
The Liber decretalium does not have an independent manuscript tradition; it has to be reconstructed from later collections. According to Wurm's analysis, it originally contained 38 decretals and one imperial rescript (see Wurms pp. 62-81): | The Liber decretalium does not have an independent manuscript tradition; it has to be reconstructed from later collections. According to Wurm's analysis, it originally contained 38 decretals and one imperial rescript (see Wurms pp. 62-81): | ||
#Siricius, {{JK|255}} | # Siricius, {{JK|255}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|311}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|311}}. | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|286}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|286}}. | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|293}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|293}}. | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|314}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|314}}. | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|315}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|315}}. | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|316}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|316}}. | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|304}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|304}}. | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|317}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|317}}. | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|313}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|313}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|297}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|297}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|302}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|302}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|301}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|301}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|309}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|309}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|306}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|306}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|308}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|308}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|305}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|305}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|310}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|310}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|307}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|307}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|318}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|318}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|299}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|299}} | ||
#Innocent I, {{JK|303}} | # Innocent I, {{JK|303}} | ||
#Zosimus, {{JK|339}} | # Zosimus, {{JK|339}} | ||
#Zosimus, {{JK|345}} | # Zosimus, {{JK|345}} | ||
#Boniface, {{JK|353}} | # Boniface, {{JK|353}} | ||
#Honorius see Maassen 320 / Wurm p. 71 | # Honorius see Maassen 320 / Wurm p. 71 | ||
#Boniface, {{JK|349}} | # Boniface, {{JK|349}} | ||
#Boniface, {{JK|362}} | # Boniface, {{JK|362}} | ||
#Celestine, {{JK|381}}, followed by a short florilegium | # Celestine, {{JK|381}}, followed by a short florilegium | ||
#Celestine, {{JK|369}} | # Celestine, {{JK|369}} | ||
#Celestine, {{JK|371}} | # Celestine, {{JK|371}} | ||
#Leo I, {{JK|402}} | # Leo I, {{JK|402}} | ||
#Leo I, {{JK|405}} | # Leo I, {{JK|405}} | ||
#Leo I, {{JK|414}} | # Leo I, {{JK|414}} | ||
#Leo I, {{JK|416}} | # Leo I, {{JK|416}} | ||
#Leo I, {{JK|544}} | # Leo I, {{JK|544}} | ||
#Leo I, {{JK|411}} | # Leo I, {{JK|411}} | ||
#Leo I, {{JK|536}} | # Leo I, {{JK|536}} | ||
#Leo I, {{JK|410}} | # Leo I, {{JK|410}} | ||
#Gelasius I, {{JK|363}} | # Gelasius I, {{JK|363}} | ||
#Anastasius, {{JK|744}} | # Anastasius, {{JK|744}} | ||
The latter three are additions not found in the "reine Dionysiana" according to Wurm p. 75: | The latter three are additions not found in the "reine Dionysiana" according to Wurm p. 75: |
Revision as of 13:46, 20 June 2024
Title | Liber decretalium Dionysii |
---|---|
Key | DX |
Alternative title | Sammlung der Decretalen (Maassen) |
Alternative title | Dekretalensammlung des Dionysius (Wurm) |
Size | Small (100 to 500 canons) |
Terminus post quem | 496 |
Terminus ante quem | 523 |
Century | saec. VI |
Place of origin | Rome |
European region of origin | Central Italy |
General region of origin | Southern Europe and Mediterranean |
Main author | User:Christof Rolker |
Dionysius compiled a collection of decretals, using previous collections (not papal registers). Importantly, he distinguished between different kinds of papal letters and selected only "legal" (as opposed to "dogmatic") letters, a distinction that had a profound impact on Western canon law (d'Avray).
The Liber decretalium began with a dedicatory letter to a certain priest Julian followed by a capitulatio in the form of a numbered list of all rubrics of the decretals (Wurm p. 62).
Contents
The Liber decretalium does not have an independent manuscript tradition; it has to be reconstructed from later collections. According to Wurm's analysis, it originally contained 38 decretals and one imperial rescript (see Wurms pp. 62-81):
- Siricius, JK 255
- Innocent I, JK 311.
- Innocent I, JK 286.
- Innocent I, JK 293.
- Innocent I, JK 314.
- Innocent I, JK 315.
- Innocent I, JK 316.
- Innocent I, JK 304.
- Innocent I, JK 317.
- Innocent I, JK 313
- Innocent I, JK 297
- Innocent I, JK 302
- Innocent I, JK 301
- Innocent I, JK 309
- Innocent I, JK 306
- Innocent I, JK 308
- Innocent I, JK 305
- Innocent I, JK 310
- Innocent I, JK 307
- Innocent I, JK 318
- Innocent I, JK 299
- Innocent I, JK 303
- Zosimus, JK 339
- Zosimus, JK 345
- Boniface, JK 353
- Honorius see Maassen 320 / Wurm p. 71
- Boniface, JK 349
- Boniface, JK 362
- Celestine, JK 381, followed by a short florilegium
- Celestine, JK 369
- Celestine, JK 371
- Leo I, JK 402
- Leo I, JK 405
- Leo I, JK 414
- Leo I, JK 416
- Leo I, JK 544
- Leo I, JK 411
- Leo I, JK 536
- Leo I, JK 410
- Gelasius I, JK 363
- Anastasius, JK 744
The latter three are additions not found in the "reine Dionysiana" according to Wurm p. 75:
The Collectio Dionysiana adaucta contains further additions from the letters of Leo I (Wurms p. 77)
The manuscripts
There are 2 manuscripts containing the Liber decretalium described in this Wiki. See Category:Manuscript of DX and the individual entries. Kéry p. 21 lists two complete manuscripts (decretal collection including praefatio) plus two more containing "small collections of excerpts":
Excerpts
Editions and Literature
For Justel's problematic edition, and scholarly literature, see Collectio Dionysiana II. In addition, see
Categories
- key is DX
- belongs to: Dionysiana group
- very small collection (i.e. 38 letters - not canons!)
- from Rome
- saec. VI
- entries based on Migne