Toulouse, BM, 364: Difference between revisions

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
m added category
m Text replacement - "gallica.bnf]" to "gallica.bnf.fr]"
 
(11 intermediate revisions by 4 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
Toulouse, BM, 364 (''olim'' I. 63; "Cod. Tolos. B 63" in Maassen) and [[Paris, BnF, lat. 8901]] are a copy of the [[Collectio Albigensis]] written before 666/667. According to {{author|Loew}}, [[Albi, BM, 2]] was a faithful copy of this manuscript; hence the subscriptio preserved there (on fol. 17r) actually refers to the making of the Toulouse manuscript: it was written by a certain Perpetuus at the request of Bishop Dido of Albi (CLA VI 836). As Dido is not attested otherwise, the date is disputed. Maassen, based on the reference to King Childeric in the subscriptio, dated it to 673, the year he (wrongly) assumed Childerich II died. Turner tought a date between 626 and 666 most likely while Ourliac assumed the manuscript was written ca. 600.  
{{Infobox manuscript
    | library      = Toulouse, BM
    | shelfmark    = 364
    | descriptionat = [https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc1116675/cN100781 archivesetmanuscrits.bnf]
    | digitalimages = [https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10560139j gallica.bnf.fr]
    | author1      = [[User:Lotte Kéry|Lotte Kéry]]
    | normregion    = Southern France
    | coll          = Collectio Albigensis
    | century      = saec. VII
    | clanumber    = [https://elmss.nuigalway.ie/catalogue/1251 CLA VI 836]
|provenance=?|bischoffnumber=-|olim=I. 63|taq3=667|descriptionat2=[https://www.mirabileweb.it/manuscript/toulouse-médiathèque-josé-cabanis-(olim-bibliothèq-manuscript/13307 mirabileweb.it]}}Toulouse, BM, 364 (''olim'' I. 63; "Cod. Tolos. B 63" in Maassen) and [[Paris, BnF, lat. 8901]] are a copy of the [[Collectio Albigensis]] written before 666/667. According to {{author|Loew}}, [[Albi, BM, 2]] was a faithful copy of this manuscript; hence the subscriptio preserved there (on fol. 17r) actually refers to the making of the Toulouse manuscript: it was written by a certain Perpetuus at the request of Bishop Dido of Albi (CLA VI 836). As Dido is not attested otherwise, the date is disputed. {{author|Maassen}}, based on the reference to King Childeric in the subscriptio, dated it to 673, the year he (wrongly) assumed Childerich II died. Turner tought a date between 626 and 666 most likely while Ourliac assumed the manuscript was written ca. 600.  


The Toulouse manuscript (incomplete at the beginning and the end) today has 107 folios and contains the Albigensis from the Council of Gangres (fol. 1-2) to a letter of Leo I (JK 318) and "capitula sancti Augustini" apparently ending on fol. 107.
The Toulouse manuscript (incomplete at the beginning and the end) today has 107 folios and contains the Albigensis from the Council of Gangres (fol. 1-2) to a letter of Leo I ({{JK|318}}) and "capitula sancti Augustini" apparently ending on fol. 107.


The part of the manuscript today in Paris (nine folios) had been stolen by Count Libri (CLA).
The part of the manuscript today in Paris (nine folios) had been stolen by Count Libri (CLA).


== Links ==
==Literature==
* online: https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b10560139j
* description: https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc1116675/cN100781
* CLA VI 836 https://elmss.nuigalway.ie/catalogue/1251
 
== Literature ==
{{Author|Maassen}}, Geschichte pp. {{Maassen|592}}; {{Author|Turner}}, A Group of MSS of Canons at Toulouse, Albi and Paris, JTS 2 (1900-1901) 266-267; CLA 6, no. 836, pp. 39 and 48; CLA Suppl. p. 58; {{Author|Ourliac}}, Manuscrit toulousain p. 54; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|47}}
{{Author|Maassen}}, Geschichte pp. {{Maassen|592}}; {{Author|Turner}}, A Group of MSS of Canons at Toulouse, Albi and Paris, JTS 2 (1900-1901) 266-267; CLA 6, no. 836, pp. 39 and 48; CLA Suppl. p. 58; {{Author|Ourliac}}, Manuscrit toulousain p. 54; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|47}}


Line 22: Line 27:
[[Category:Manuscript from Southern France]]
[[Category:Manuscript from Southern France]]
[[Category:Manuscript of Collectio Albigensis]]
[[Category:Manuscript of Collectio Albigensis]]
[[Category:Manuscript in Toulouse, BM]]

Latest revision as of 20:48, 26 November 2025

Library Toulouse, BM
Shelfmark 364
Olim shelfmark I. 63
Century saec. VII
Terminus ante quem 3 667
Provenance ?
European region of origin Southern France
Collection Collectio Albigensis
Digital Images gallica.bnf.fr
Description at archivesetmanuscrits.bnf
Description at 2 mirabileweb.it
CLA CLA VI 836
Bischoff number -
Author Lotte Kéry

Toulouse, BM, 364 (olim I. 63; "Cod. Tolos. B 63" in Maassen) and Paris, BnF, lat. 8901 are a copy of the Collectio Albigensis written before 666/667. According to Loew, Albi, BM, 2 was a faithful copy of this manuscript; hence the subscriptio preserved there (on fol. 17r) actually refers to the making of the Toulouse manuscript: it was written by a certain Perpetuus at the request of Bishop Dido of Albi (CLA VI 836). As Dido is not attested otherwise, the date is disputed. Maassen, based on the reference to King Childeric in the subscriptio, dated it to 673, the year he (wrongly) assumed Childerich II died. Turner tought a date between 626 and 666 most likely while Ourliac assumed the manuscript was written ca. 600.

The Toulouse manuscript (incomplete at the beginning and the end) today has 107 folios and contains the Albigensis from the Council of Gangres (fol. 1-2) to a letter of Leo I (JK 318) and "capitula sancti Augustini" apparently ending on fol. 107.

The part of the manuscript today in Paris (nine folios) had been stolen by Count Libri (CLA).

Literature

Maassen, Geschichte pp. 592; Turner, A Group of MSS of Canons at Toulouse, Albi and Paris, JTS 2 (1900-1901) 266-267; CLA 6, no. 836, pp. 39 and 48; CLA Suppl. p. 58; Ourliac, Manuscrit toulousain p. 54; Kéry, Collections p. 47