Talk:Collectio Turonensis: Difference between revisions
Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
Latest comment: 23 November by Christof Rolker in topic Two Collectiones Turonenses
Clemens Radl (talk | contribs) m Clearer wording re Tours. |
→Two Collectiones Turonenses: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Two Collectiones Turonenses == | ==Two Collectiones Turonenses== | ||
There are actually two Collections from Tours. One is the well established ''Coll. Turonensis'' with papal letters etc. The other is a collection transcribed from [[Cambridge, Parker Library, 279]] by Michael Elliot. The latter manuscript is from Tours and, hence, the collection was named ''Collectio Turonensis'' by Michael Elliot. This Turonensis has material that is closely related to the ''Hibernensis'' (yet, as far as I remember, Elliot suggests that this ''Coll. Tur.'' might have been a source for the ''Hibernensis''. | There are actually two Collections from Tours. One is the well established ''Coll. Turonensis'' with papal letters etc. The other is a collection transcribed from [[Cambridge, Parker Library, 279]] by Michael Elliot. The latter manuscript is from Tours and, hence, the collection was named ''Collectio Turonensis'' by Michael Elliot. This Turonensis has material that is closely related to the ''Hibernensis'' (yet, as far as I remember, Elliot suggests that this ''Coll. Tur.'' might have been a source for the ''Hibernensis''. | ||
So I'll change the wording of the article, but we will have to decide on an appropriate name of the "new" ''Turonensis''. [[User:Clemens Radl|Clemens Radl]] ([[User talk:Clemens Radl|talk]]) 15:56, 23 November 2025 (CET) | So I'll change the wording of the article, but we will have to decide on an appropriate name of the "new" ''Turonensis''. [[User:Clemens Radl|Clemens Radl]] ([[User talk:Clemens Radl|talk]]) 15:56, 23 November 2025 (CET) | ||
:Thanks for pointing this our. Per our respective [[Conventions on referencing collections|Conventions]] (according to which the "more established name is retained, and the other collection(s) are given new names, often referring to a manuscript they are found in") I suggest "Collectio canonum in Cambridge, Parker Library, 279", or perhaps even better "Collectio Turonensis in ..." to honour Michael's work. atb [[User:Christof Rolker|Christof Rolker]] ([[User talk:Christof Rolker|talk]]) 20:29, 23 November 2025 (CET) | |||
Latest revision as of 20:29, 23 November 2025
Two Collectiones Turonenses
There are actually two Collections from Tours. One is the well established Coll. Turonensis with papal letters etc. The other is a collection transcribed from Cambridge, Parker Library, 279 by Michael Elliot. The latter manuscript is from Tours and, hence, the collection was named Collectio Turonensis by Michael Elliot. This Turonensis has material that is closely related to the Hibernensis (yet, as far as I remember, Elliot suggests that this Coll. Tur. might have been a source for the Hibernensis.
So I'll change the wording of the article, but we will have to decide on an appropriate name of the "new" Turonensis. Clemens Radl (talk) 15:56, 23 November 2025 (CET)
- Thanks for pointing this our. Per our respective Conventions (according to which the "more established name is retained, and the other collection(s) are given new names, often referring to a manuscript they are found in") I suggest "Collectio canonum in Cambridge, Parker Library, 279", or perhaps even better "Collectio Turonensis in ..." to honour Michael's work. atb Christof Rolker (talk) 20:29, 23 November 2025 (CET)
