Paris, BnF, lat. 3861: Difference between revisions

Selected Canon Law Collections, ca. 500–1234
← Older editNewer edit →
VisualWikitext
Line 10: Line 10:
Paris, BnF, lat. 3861 appears to be closely related to [[Montpellier, BM, 7]] and [[Troyes, BM, 1386]]).
Paris, BnF, lat. 3861 appears to be closely related to [[Montpellier, BM, 7]] and [[Troyes, BM, 1386]]).


== Codicology ==
==Codicology==


The manuscript consists of 180 folios, written in Carolingian minuscule, with a two-column layout. The decoration is simple, consisting mostly of small red initials and rubricated titles.
The manuscript consists of 180 folios, written in Carolingian minuscule, with a two-column layout. The decoration is simple, consisting mostly of small red initials and rubricated titles.
Line 16: Line 16:
Note on f. 1r: ''Hunc codicem canonici anicienses bibliothecae colbertinae donarunt anno MDCLXXXI. Steph. Baluzius.''
Note on f. 1r: ''Hunc codicem canonici anicienses bibliothecae colbertinae donarunt anno MDCLXXXI. Steph. Baluzius.''


== Contents ==
==Contents==
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{| class="wikitable sortable"
!Burchard chapter
!Burchard chapter
Line 62: Line 62:
|Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 6–7, 14; Schneider MHG Ordines pp. 31-37; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 43; Hoffmann/Pokorny, Dekret pp. 41–45
|Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 6–7, 14; Schneider MHG Ordines pp. 31-37; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 43; Hoffmann/Pokorny, Dekret pp. 41–45
|-
|-
|VIII.38
|[https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/db/search?context=3&key=BU08.038 BU08.038]
|
|[https://gallica.bnf.fr/view3if/ga/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f190 91v]
|While "German" copies (and [[Parma, Biblioteca Palatina, 3777]]) have the complete chapter (''Si quis sacro uelamine consecratam in -- sine spe coniugii maneat''), many ''deteriores'' break off with ''cohabitare tecto'', followed by spatium or not. Sometimes, the missing text is added by a later hand; sometimes, c. 38 is merged with c. 49, or followed directly by c. 50. See fol. 117v-118r of the editio princeps for c. 38, fol. 118r for c. 39, and fol. 119v for cc. 49-50.
|BnF lat. break off with ''cohabitare tecto'', followed by spatium. C. 38 is followed directly by half of c. 49. See fol. [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/view/bsb10148587?page=274 117v]-118r of the editio princeps for c. 38, [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/view/bsb10148587?page=275 fol. 118r] for c. 39, and [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/view/bsb10148587?page=278 fol. 119v] for cc. 49-50.
|Fransen, Montpellier p. 303–304; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 9–10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
|Fransen, Montpellier p. 303–304; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 9–10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
|-
|-
|VIII.49-50
|[https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/db/search?context=3&key=BU08.049 BU08.049-50]
|
|[https://gallica.bnf.fr/view3if/ga/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f190 91v] - [https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f191.item 92r]
|''Deteriores'' copies typically lack cc. 39-48; c. 49 may be incomplete or missing altogether. Sometimes, the two fragmentary canons cc. 38 and 49 are merged into one (grammatically disturbed) canon. See fol. 118r-119v of the ''editio princeps'' for a complete series of cc. 39-50.
|Lack of cc. 39-48; c. 49 is incomplete, starting from ''valead custodiri detruere''. See fol. [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/view/bsb10148587?page=275 118r]-[https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/view/bsb10148587?page=278 119v] of the ''editio princeps''.
|Fransen, Montpellier p. 303–304; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 9–10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
|Fransen, Montpellier p. 303–304; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 9–10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
|-
|-
|XII.9
|[https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/db/search?context=3&key=BU12.009 BU12.009]
|
|[https://gallica.bnf.fr/view3if/ga/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f246 119v]
|In the ''deteriores'' copies, c. 9 ends with ''similiter peniteat. Sin autem'' (note that in copies like [[London, British Library, Cotton Claudius C.vi|London, BL, Cotton Claudius C.vi]], the ''sin autem'' is missing too).
|Here, c. 9 ends with ''similiter peniteat,'' see in the ''editio princeps'' fol. [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb10148587?page=348 154v].
|Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten pp. 137-138, 155
|Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten pp. 137-138, 155
|-
|-
|XII.10-20
|[https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/db/search?context=15&key=BU12.010 BU12.010-20]
|
|[https://gallica.bnf.fr/view3if/ga/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f246 119v]-[https://gallica.bnf.fr/view3if/ga/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f247 120r]
|Most copies which break off in c. 9 with ''sin autem'' also lack cc. 10-20.
|Cc. 10-20 are present.
See the ''editio princeps'' fol. [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb10148587?page=351 156r].
|Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten pp. 137-138, 155
|Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten pp. 137-138, 155
|-
|-
|XII.29
|[https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/db/search?context=3&key=BU12.029 BU12.029]
|
|[https://gallica.bnf.fr/view3if/ga/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f250 121v]
|The canon is transmitted in a number of variants:
|The canon is transmitted in a number of variants:


* The phrase ''et post paululum'' is sometimes replaced by other words
* The c. starts with ''ut enim dum periurare''
* ''de iepte discernens''
 
* What is the wording between ''asserendi copia profluus'' and ''hęc in suis narrat affectibus''?
*The phrase ''et post paululum'' is present
* What is the wording between ''in malis promissis rescinde fidem'' and ''quod incaute novisti non facias''. (One Italian branch here reads ''eloquentię fructu fecundus'').
*What is the wording between ''asserendi copia profluus'' and ''hęc in suis narrat affectibus''? In BnF 3861: ''asserendi copia profluus'' ''eloquentię fructu fecundus'' ''hęc in suis narrat affectibus.''
*What is the wording between ''in malis promissis rescinde fidem'' and ''quod incaute novisti non facias''? Here'':'' ''in malis promissis rescinde fidem, in turpi voto, cave ut'' ''decretum'' ''quod incaute voluisti non facias.''
|Fransen, Montpellier p. 304; Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 12–13, 15–18; Hoffmann/Pokorny, Dekret pp. 61, 63–64
|Fransen, Montpellier p. 304; Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 12–13, 15–18; Hoffmann/Pokorny, Dekret pp. 61, 63–64
|-
|-
|XIX.108
|[https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/db/search?context=3&key=BU19.108 BU19.108]
|
|[https://gallica.bnf.fr/view3if/ga/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f346 169v]
|In ''deteriores'' copies, book 19 ends here.
|In ''deteriores'' copies, book 19 ends here (fol. [https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb10148587?page=469 215r] in the ''editio princeps).'' But in Bnf 3681 the Book XIX is complete.
|Fransen, Montpellier pp. 304–305; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10–11, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
|Fransen, Montpellier pp. 304–305; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10–11, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
|-
|-
|XX.57
|[https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/db/search?context=3&key=BU20.057 XX.57]
|
|[https://gallica.bnf.fr/view3if/ga/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f366 179v]
|In ''deteriores'' copies, book 20 ends with c. 57. Sometimes the missing canons are added by a later hand and/or other additions are found here, including JE †1996, JE 1362, and JK 744.
|Here, as in ''deteriores'' copies, book 20 ends with c. 57.  
|Fransen, Montpellier p. 305; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 11; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
|Fransen, Montpellier p. 305; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 11; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
|-
|-
|After book 20
|[https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/db/search?context=3&key=BU20.110 After book 20]
|
|[https://gallica.bnf.fr/view3if/ga/ark:/12148/btv1b52513586k/f367 180r]
|The canons of Seligenstadt are found in several Burchard copies, most commonly after the last book of the ''Liber''. Jasper has disinguished two recensions, see his account in MGH Conc. 8.
|Addition: ''In librum constitutionum legis iustiniane, constitutione CV, cap. CCCLXVI''
|Rolker, Letters p. 112.- Jasper, MGH Conc. 8 pp. 24-26.
|Rolker, Letters p. 112.- Jasper, MGH Conc. 8 pp. 24-26.
|}
|}


== Literature ==
==Literature==
{{Author|Schneider}}, MGH Ordines [https://www.dmgh.de/mgh_ordines/index.htm#page/237/mode/1up 237]; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections pp. {{Kéry|139}} (the manuscript), 140-141 (similarities to Montpellier and Troyes).
{{Author|Schneider}}, MGH Ordines [https://www.dmgh.de/mgh_ordines/index.htm#page/237/mode/1up 237]; {{Author|Kéry}}, Collections pp. {{Kéry|139}} (the manuscript), 140-141 (similarities to Montpellier and Troyes).


Revision as of 21:00, 18 July 2025

Library Paris, BnF
Shelfmark lat. 3861
Century saec. XII
Provenance Notre-Dame du Puy-en-Velay
Place of origin Puy-en-Velay
European region of origin Southern France
Collection Burchard of Worms, Liber decretorum
Digital Images gallica.bnf.fr
Digital Images 2 gallica.bnf.fr (Microfilm)
Author Lotte Kéry


Manuscript latin 3681 of the Bibliothèque nationale de France is a parchment manuscript from the first half of the 12th century probably produced in the Cathedral of Notre-Dame du Puy-en-Velay. It contains Burchard's Liber decretorum.

Paris, BnF, lat. 3861 appears to be closely related to Montpellier, BM, 7 and Troyes, BM, 1386).

Codicology

The manuscript consists of 180 folios, written in Carolingian minuscule, with a two-column layout. The decoration is simple, consisting mostly of small red initials and rubricated titles.

Note on f. 1r: Hunc codicem canonici anicienses bibliothecae colbertinae donarunt anno MDCLXXXI. Steph. Baluzius.

Contents

Burchard chapter fol. Significant Variants Literature
BU01.021 6r Between Cavendum et summopere […] per os dicat Gregorii and Et alibi. Dolens inquit […] diu stare non poterit is found the long version of the canon: Cur non videtur, cur non perpenditur quod a benedictio illi in maledictionem convertitur, quia ad hoc ut fiat hęreticus ordinatur. Et item. Quisquis contra hanc simoniacam […] tantummodo inaniter concupiscit […] stare non poterit.

For the short version, see editio princeps fol. 3rb: Cur non perpendit, quia benedictio illi in maledictionem converitur.

Fowler-Magerl, Fine Distinctions pp. 147–149; Fransen, Montpellier p. 306; Fransen, Valeur p. 6; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 22–23, 33
BU01.023 6v There is an addition after c. 23. As in many Italian copies, in BnF lat. 3861 c. 23 is followed by Si quis episcopus aut presbiter aut abbas per pecuniam […] et sit anathema sicut Simon Magus a Petro.

In the editio princeps fol. 3va, c. 23 ends ... detestatio ne percussus, and c. 24 begins: Quod non oporteat ordinationes episcoporum diu differri. Quoniam quidam metropolitanorum quantum comperimus ne ...

Fransen, Montpellier p. 306
BU01.234 28r No additions after the end of book one, but the last canon is reported as c. 232 (Quia vero plurimi episcoporum ex aliis […] est in troadam).

See fol. 32r in the editio princeps.

Dusil, Wissensordnungen p. 257 n. 258
BU02.018-024 30v-31r C. 23 (De rebus vero illorum vel peculiari) is displaced, so that the sequence of canons is "18, 23, 19-22, 24". See fol. 36r-36v of the editio princeps for the standard sequence. Fransen, Montpellier pp. 301, 307; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 33–34; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten p. 135
BU02.239 - end part 43v Standard end of Book II. See fol. 54r of the editio princeps for the ending of book two („Wormser Ordnung Typ A“).
BU03.015 46r Addition after c. 15 (see fol. 58r of the editio princeps), namely an excerpt from JE 1317 beginning Pervenit ad me quod and ending per clericorum ambitum destruantur. Fransen, Montpellier p. 306; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 44–45
BU03.241- end part 64r-65v After book three (f. 64r) is added a synodal order. The most common one is Schneider's Ordo 5 but there is considerable variety, as Schneider's discussion of the individual ordines makes clear. See fol. 81 of the editio princeps for the ending of book three („Wormser Ordnung Typ A“).

Here: Ordo de celebrando concilio, incipit: Hora diei prima, ante solis ortum, eiciantur omnes ab ecclesia.

Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 6–7, 14; Schneider MHG Ordines pp. 31-37; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 43; Hoffmann/Pokorny, Dekret pp. 41–45
BU08.038 91v BnF lat. break off with cohabitare tecto, followed by spatium. C. 38 is followed directly by half of c. 49. See fol. 117v-118r of the editio princeps for c. 38, fol. 118r for c. 39, and fol. 119v for cc. 49-50. Fransen, Montpellier p. 303–304; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 9–10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
BU08.049-50 91v - 92r Lack of cc. 39-48; c. 49 is incomplete, starting from valead custodiri detruere. See fol. 118r-119v of the editio princeps. Fransen, Montpellier p. 303–304; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 9–10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
BU12.009 119v Here, c. 9 ends with similiter peniteat, see in the editio princeps fol. 154v. Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten pp. 137-138, 155
BU12.010-20 119v-120r Cc. 10-20 are present.

See the editio princeps fol. 156r.

Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53; Gneckow, Abhängigkeiten pp. 137-138, 155
BU12.029 121v The canon is transmitted in a number of variants:
  • The c. starts with ut enim dum periurare
  • The phrase et post paululum is present
  • What is the wording between asserendi copia profluus and hęc in suis narrat affectibus? In BnF 3861: asserendi copia profluus eloquentię fructu fecundus hęc in suis narrat affectibus.
  • What is the wording between in malis promissis rescinde fidem and quod incaute novisti non facias? Here: in malis promissis rescinde fidem, in turpi voto, cave ut decretum quod incaute voluisti non facias.
 Fransen, Montpellier p. 304; Fransen, Tradition pp. 116–117; Fransen, Valeur pp. 12–13, 15–18; Hoffmann/Pokorny, Dekret pp. 61, 63–64
BU19.108 169v In deteriores copies, book 19 ends here (fol. 215r in the editio princeps). But in Bnf 3681 the Book XIX is complete. Fransen, Montpellier pp. 304–305; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 10–11, 19; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
XX.57 179v Here, as in deteriores copies, book 20 ends with c. 57. Fransen, Montpellier p. 305; Fransen, Valeur pp. 2, 11; Galli/Rolker, Destroyed pp. 20, 49–53
After book 20 180r Addition: In librum constitutionum legis iustiniane, constitutione CV, cap. CCCLXVI Rolker, Letters p. 112.- Jasper, MGH Conc. 8 pp. 24-26.

Literature

Schneider, MGH Ordines 237; Kéry, Collections pp. 139 (the manuscript), 140-141 (similarities to Montpellier and Troyes).


Retrieved from "https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php?title=Paris,_BnF,_lat._3861&oldid=38763"