Paris, BnF, lat. 3858B: Difference between revisions
Clemens Radl (talk | contribs) m Set default sortkey. |
additions based on Brett |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
| descriptionat = [https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc625732 archivesetmanuscrits.bnf] | | descriptionat = [https://archivesetmanuscrits.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cc625732 archivesetmanuscrits.bnf] | ||
| digitalimages = [https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b100733000 gallica.bnf] | | digitalimages = [https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b100733000 gallica.bnf] | ||
| author1 | | descriptionat2 = [https://data.biblissima.fr/w/Item:Q369541 data.biblissima.fr] | ||
| normregion | | author1 = [[User:MB|Martin Brett]] | ||
| coll | | normregion = unknown | ||
| century | | coll = Collectio Tripartita | ||
| century = saec. XII<sup>2/2</sup> | |||
}} | |||
BnF, lat. 3858B was {{author|Fournier}}'s base manuscript. It is a copy of the second version which has been heavily corrected at intervals, often against a first version copy, usually by erasure. The microfilm (also online) is often obscure, even where the manuscript has not been altered. Its text has some variants otherwise only found in '''L''', and others which link it with the original form of '''RX'''; there are a large number of cases where '''C''' and '''R''' (but not '''X''') have subsequently been corrected. One or two of the alterations to '''C''' suggest it has been ‘contaminated’ by readings from [[Gratian, Concordia discordantium canonum|Gratian]], though in principle the derivation might be the reverse. It has been annotated in some detail by an early modern scholar | |||
Paris, BnF, lat. 3858B (Colbertinus) is a copy of the second version of the ''[[Collectio Tripartita]]''. It is manuscript '''C''' in the {{author|Brett/Nowak}} edition. | |||
saec. XII<sup>2/2</sup>, written in two columns; it is said to be from Le Mans. | |||
BnF, lat. 3858B was {{author|Fournier}}'s base manuscript. It is a copy of the second version which has been heavily corrected at intervals, often against a first version copy, usually by erasure. The microfilm (also online) is often obscure, even where the manuscript has not been altered. Its text has some variants otherwise only found in '''L''' ([[Olomouc, Státní archiv, Universitni knihovna, C.O.205]]), and others which link it with the original form of '''RX'''; there are a large number of cases where '''C''' and '''R''' (but not '''X''') have subsequently been corrected (see the description of '''R''' = [[Città del Vaticano, BAV, Reg. lat. 973|Reg. lat. 973]]). One or two of the alterations to '''C''' suggest it has been ‘contaminated’ by readings from [[Gratian, Concordia discordantium canonum|Gratian]], though in principle the derivation might be the reverse. It has been annotated in some detail by an early modern scholar. | |||
== Links == | == Links == | ||
For a list of manuscripts and a provisional edition, see {{Author|Brett/Nowak}}, [http://ivo-of-chartres.github.io/tripartita.html Tripartita] | |||
== Literature == | |||
{{Author|Kéry}}, Collections p. {{Kéry|245}} | |||
[[Category:Manuscript saec XII]] | [[Category:Manuscript saec XII]] | ||
Revision as of 23:05, 29 March 2025
| Library | Paris, BnF |
|---|---|
| Shelfmark | lat. 3858B |
| Century | saec. XII2/2 |
| Provenance | ? |
| European region of origin | unknown |
| Collection | Collectio Tripartita |
| Digital Images | gallica.bnf |
| Description at | archivesetmanuscrits.bnf |
| Description at 2 | data.biblissima.fr |
| Author | Martin Brett |
Paris, BnF, lat. 3858B (Colbertinus) is a copy of the second version of the Collectio Tripartita. It is manuscript C in the Brett/Nowak edition.
saec. XII2/2, written in two columns; it is said to be from Le Mans.
BnF, lat. 3858B was Fournier's base manuscript. It is a copy of the second version which has been heavily corrected at intervals, often against a first version copy, usually by erasure. The microfilm (also online) is often obscure, even where the manuscript has not been altered. Its text has some variants otherwise only found in L (Olomouc, Státní archiv, Universitni knihovna, C.O.205), and others which link it with the original form of RX; there are a large number of cases where C and R (but not X) have subsequently been corrected (see the description of R = Reg. lat. 973). One or two of the alterations to C suggest it has been ‘contaminated’ by readings from Gratian, though in principle the derivation might be the reverse. It has been annotated in some detail by an early modern scholar.
Links
For a list of manuscripts and a provisional edition, see Brett/Nowak, Tripartita
Literature
Kéry, Collections p. 245
