Collectio canonum in Torino, BNU, E. V. 44, fol. 71v–86v: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Christof Rolker moved page The Collectio canonum in the Ms Turin, BNU 903 (E. V. 44), fol. 71v–86v to The Collectio canonum in the Ms Turin, BNU, E. V. 44, fol. 71v–86v: "903" is an olim shelfmark; entry is now aligned with that on the collection in Turin, BNU, D. IV. 33)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DISPLAYTITLE:The ''Collectio canonum'' in the Ms Turin, BNU 903 (E. V. 44), fol. 71v–86v}}
{{DISPLAYTITLE:The ''Collectio canonum'' in the Ms Turin, BNU 903 (E. V. 44), fol. 71v–86v}}


The manuscript Turin, BNU E. V. 44 (903) contains a mixture of patristic material and canon law copied by several different scribes. Liberties were taken with the texts. Excerpts from the collection of Deusdedit are found at the beginning of the manuscript together with excerpts from the much earlier ''Herovalliana'' and ''Hibernensis''. The most recent text in the manuscript is the excerpt from a letter of pope Paschal II, ''Testimonium est sermo'' (JL 6612), found on fol. 57v.  {{FM|173}} Giuseppe Motta argues that the manuscript was copied in northern Italy because the treatise ''De corpore et sanguine'' of Gezone, excerpts of which are found on fol. 40r–43r, circulated principally at the foot of the Alps. Use of a form of the collection of Anselm of Lucca close to that of A Ven and B substantiates this supposition.
The manuscript [https://beta.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php/Torino,_Biblioteca_nazionale_universitaria,_E.V.44 Torino, BNU E. V. 44] contains a mixture of patristic material and canon law copied by several different scribes. Liberties were taken with the texts. Excerpts from the collection of Deusdedit are found at the beginning of the manuscript together with excerpts from the much earlier ''Herovalliana'' and ''Hibernensis''. The most recent text in the manuscript is the excerpt from a letter of pope Paschal II, ''Testimonium est sermo'' (JL 6612), found on fol. 57v.  {{FM|173}} Giuseppe Motta argues that the manuscript was copied in northern Italy because the treatise ''De corpore et sanguine'' of Gezone, excerpts of which are found on fol. 40r–43r, circulated principally at the foot of the Alps. Use of a form of the collection of Anselm of Lucca close to that of A Ven and B substantiates this supposition.


A collection of 150 canons on fol. 71v–86v is preceded by a capitulation which contains rubrics for the first 91 canons. The canons in the collection have rubrics ''in textu'', sometimes differing slightly from those in the capitulation. Giuseppe Motta has described the contents of the manuscript as a whole and analysed this particular collection. The present analysis of this collection ({{Coll|DA}}) makes use of his analysis and ignores the rest of the manuscript. The most recent text in this part of the manuscript is the letter of pope Gregory VII to Hermann of Metz on March 15, 1081 (Reg. 8. 21, JL 5201). The collection also contains the letter of Gregory VII to Manasses of Reims in 1078 (Reg. 6. 2, JL 5081), the 11th decree of the Roman council of November 19, 1078 (Reg. 6. 5b, JL ante 5084) and the 1st and 2nd decrees of the Roman council of March 7, 1080 (Reg. 7. 14a, JL post 5154).
A collection of 150 canons on fol. 71v–86v is preceded by a capitulation which contains rubrics for the first 91 canons. The canons in the collection have rubrics ''in textu'', sometimes differing slightly from those in the capitulation. Giuseppe Motta has described the contents of the manuscript as a whole and analysed this particular collection. The present analysis of this collection ({{Coll|DA}}) makes use of his analysis and ignores the rest of the manuscript. The most recent text in this part of the manuscript is the letter of pope Gregory VII to Hermann of Metz on March 15, 1081 (Reg. 8. 21, JL 5201). The collection also contains the letter of Gregory VII to Manasses of Reims in 1078 (Reg. 6. 2, JL 5081), the 11th decree of the Roman council of November 19, 1078 (Reg. 6. 5b, JL ante 5084) and the 1st and 2nd decrees of the Roman council of March 7, 1080 (Reg. 7. 14a, JL post 5154).
Line 7: Line 7:
The collection begins with the rubric: ''De excellentia apostolice sedis'' (A Ven in the Ms Mantua, BCom 318: ''De primatu et excellentia Romane ecclesie'') and proceeds to the goods of the church and its privileges. Imperial intervention and lay investiture are the chief evils rather than simony. The rubric of canon 82 is: ''De excommunicatione imperatoris et absolutione suorum iuratorum''. There are texts regulating the life of canons regular, two of which (canons 97 and 98) are taken from the B version of Anselm of Lucca (canons 7. 1 and 3). Surprising is the wording of the rubric of canon 70: ''De invasoribus et iudiciorum ordine'' for the letter of pope Gregory I to Iohannes defensor, the first use of the Roman law expression ''iudiciorum ordine'' in a canon law collection.
The collection begins with the rubric: ''De excellentia apostolice sedis'' (A Ven in the Ms Mantua, BCom 318: ''De primatu et excellentia Romane ecclesie'') and proceeds to the goods of the church and its privileges. Imperial intervention and lay investiture are the chief evils rather than simony. The rubric of canon 82 is: ''De excommunicatione imperatoris et absolutione suorum iuratorum''. There are texts regulating the life of canons regular, two of which (canons 97 and 98) are taken from the B version of Anselm of Lucca (canons 7. 1 and 3). Surprising is the wording of the rubric of canon 70: ''De invasoribus et iudiciorum ordine'' for the letter of pope Gregory I to Iohannes defensor, the first use of the Roman law expression ''iudiciorum ordine'' in a canon law collection.


= Literature: =
= Literature =


For a description of the manuscript and an analysis of the canons on fol. 90r–110v see Giuseppe {{Author|Motta}}, Una silloge canonistica del sec. XII tra Deusdedit ed Anselmo di Lucca (Torino, Biblioteca Nazionale E.V.44), Studia Gratiana 27 (1996), pp. 413–442. – For a listing of the forgeries and the opinion that the forged texts are of interest in themselves see {{Author|Landau}}, Gefälschtes Recht, p. 42 and n. 130. – {{Author|Kéry}}, Canonical Collections, p. 284.  {{FM|174}}
For a description of the manuscript and an analysis of the canons on fol. 90r–110v see Giuseppe {{Author|Motta}}, Una silloge canonistica del sec. XII tra Deusdedit ed Anselmo di Lucca (Torino, Biblioteca Nazionale E.V.44), Studia Gratiana 27 (1996), pp. 413–442. – For a listing of the forgeries and the opinion that the forged texts are of interest in themselves see {{Author|Landau}}, Gefälschtes Recht, p. 42 and n. 130. – {{Author|Kéry}}, Canonical Collections, p. 284.  {{FM|174}}
= Categories =
* saec. XI/XII (Kéry) [[Category:Collections saec XII]]
* small [[Category:small (100 to 500 canons) collection]
* based on Motta's analysis [[Category:Clavis entries based on modern edition]]
* from northern Italy (Motta) [[Category:Collection from Northern Italy]]

Revision as of 09:14, 13 August 2022


The manuscript Torino, BNU E. V. 44 contains a mixture of patristic material and canon law copied by several different scribes. Liberties were taken with the texts. Excerpts from the collection of Deusdedit are found at the beginning of the manuscript together with excerpts from the much earlier Herovalliana and Hibernensis. The most recent text in the manuscript is the excerpt from a letter of pope Paschal II, Testimonium est sermo (JL 6612), found on fol. 57v. 173 Giuseppe Motta argues that the manuscript was copied in northern Italy because the treatise De corpore et sanguine of Gezone, excerpts of which are found on fol. 40r–43r, circulated principally at the foot of the Alps. Use of a form of the collection of Anselm of Lucca close to that of A Ven and B substantiates this supposition.

A collection of 150 canons on fol. 71v–86v is preceded by a capitulation which contains rubrics for the first 91 canons. The canons in the collection have rubrics in textu, sometimes differing slightly from those in the capitulation. Giuseppe Motta has described the contents of the manuscript as a whole and analysed this particular collection. The present analysis of this collection (DA) makes use of his analysis and ignores the rest of the manuscript. The most recent text in this part of the manuscript is the letter of pope Gregory VII to Hermann of Metz on March 15, 1081 (Reg. 8. 21, JL 5201). The collection also contains the letter of Gregory VII to Manasses of Reims in 1078 (Reg. 6. 2, JL 5081), the 11th decree of the Roman council of November 19, 1078 (Reg. 6. 5b, JL ante 5084) and the 1st and 2nd decrees of the Roman council of March 7, 1080 (Reg. 7. 14a, JL post 5154).

The collection begins with the rubric: De excellentia apostolice sedis (A Ven in the Ms Mantua, BCom 318: De primatu et excellentia Romane ecclesie) and proceeds to the goods of the church and its privileges. Imperial intervention and lay investiture are the chief evils rather than simony. The rubric of canon 82 is: De excommunicatione imperatoris et absolutione suorum iuratorum. There are texts regulating the life of canons regular, two of which (canons 97 and 98) are taken from the B version of Anselm of Lucca (canons 7. 1 and 3). Surprising is the wording of the rubric of canon 70: De invasoribus et iudiciorum ordine for the letter of pope Gregory I to Iohannes defensor, the first use of the Roman law expression iudiciorum ordine in a canon law collection.

Literature

For a description of the manuscript and an analysis of the canons on fol. 90r–110v see Giuseppe Motta, Una silloge canonistica del sec. XII tra Deusdedit ed Anselmo di Lucca (Torino, Biblioteca Nazionale E.V.44), Studia Gratiana 27 (1996), pp. 413–442. – For a listing of the forgeries and the opinion that the forged texts are of interest in themselves see Landau, Gefälschtes Recht, p. 42 and n. 130. – Kéry, Canonical Collections, p. 284. 174

Categories

  • saec. XI/XII (Kéry)
  • small [[Category:small (100 to 500 canons) collection]
  • based on Motta's analysis
  • from northern Italy (Motta)
Retrieved from "https://data.mgh.de/databases/clavis/wiki/index.php?title=Collectio_canonum_in_Torino,_BNU,_E._V._44,_fol._71v–86v&oldid=1540"