Pseudoisidore C: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
m (Text replacement - "Category:Descriptions lacking categories" to "Category:Description lacking categories")
No edit summary
 
(6 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
The C recension of the [[False Decretals]] is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the [[Pseudoisidore AB|A/B recension]]. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen {{author|Patzold}} has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.
The C recension of the [[False Decretals|''False Decretals'']] is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the [[Pseudoisidore AB|''Pseudoisidore AB'']]. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen {{author|Patzold}} has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.


== Contents ==
== Contents ==
The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the [[Pseudoisidore A1|A1 recension]] is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the [[Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis]]; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the [[Quesnelliana]] ([http://pseudoisidore.blogspot.com/2016/08/patzold-and-origins-of-c-recension-i.html Knibbs]). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to {{author|Patzold}} also include the [[Collectio Corbeiensis]] (for one letter), the [[Collectio Bobbiensis]], and the [[Collectio Grimanica]].
The C recension of the ''False Decretals'' contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the [[Pseudoisidore A1|''A1 recension'']] is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the [[Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis|''Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis'']]; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the ''[[Collectio Quesnelliana]]'' ([http://pseudoisidore.blogspot.com/2016/08/patzold-and-origins-of-c-recension-i.html Knibbs]). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to {{author|Patzold}} also include the [[Collectio Corbeiensis|''Collectio Corbeiensis'']] (for one letter), the [[Collectio Bobbiensis|''Collectio Bobbiensis'']], and the [[Collectio Grimanica|''Collectio Grimanica'']].
 
== Manuscripts ==
 
* [[Reims, BM, 672]] (saec. XII)
 
* [[Montpellier, Bibliothèque Interuniversitaire. Section de Médecine, H 13]]
 
* [[Paris, Bibliothèque de l’Assemblée nationale, 27 (B.19)]]
 
* [[Praha, Národní knihovna České republiky, IV.B.12]]


==Editions and Literature==
==Editions and Literature==
Line 9: Line 19:
[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
[[Category:Canonical Collection]]
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]
[[Category:Collection saec IX]]
[[Category:Articles that lack an infobox]]  
[[Category:Lacks infobox]]  
[[Category:Description lacking categories]]
[[Category:Lacks categories]]
[[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries]]   
[[Category:Collection belonging to Pseudo-Isidorian Forgeries]]   
[[Category:large (1000 to 2000 canons) collection]]
[[Category:large (1000 to 2000 canons) collection]]
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]
[[Category:Collection not in Clavis database]]

Latest revision as of 15:32, 31 December 2024

The C recension of the False Decretals is one of the major versions of this collection and is derived from the Pseudoisidore AB. It was seen as a late version of Pseudoisidore by Hinschius. Modern scholarship, however, has long suspected that it was older than the manuscript tradition (saec. XIIex and later) would suggest. Steffen Patzold has made a strong case that the "core" of the C recension indeed is a product by the Pseudoisidorian forgers themselves.

Contents

The C recension of the False Decretals contains all three parts (decretals - councils - decretals) but compared to the A1 recension is shorter. However, it has more letters of Leo I than any other recension (102 letters compared to 56 or 57 in A1). All recension drew on the letters of Leo found in the Collectio Hispana Gallica Augustodunensis; the A1 version in addition contains 18 more letters, almost all from the Collectio Quesnelliana (Knibbs). The formal sources of the Leonine dossier in C according to Patzold also include the Collectio Corbeiensis (for one letter), the Collectio Bobbiensis, and the Collectio Grimanica.

Manuscripts

Editions and Literature

See the main article Pseudoisidore, False Decretals