Collectio Corbeiensis: Difference between revisions

From Clavis Canonum
(Created page with "The ''Corbeiensis'' (saec. VI) seems not to have been mentioned in the first edition of the CLavis handbook, and was not included in the database. See here https://de.wikiped...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
The ''Corbeiensis'' (saec. VI) seems not to have been mentioned in the first edition of the CLavis handbook, and was not included in the database.
The ''Corbeiensis'' (saec. VI) seems not to have been mentioned in the first edition of the ''Clavis'' handbook, and was not included in the database.


See here https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:CRolker/Collectio_Corbeiensis
See here https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:CRolker/Collectio_Corbeiensis

Revision as of 20:29, 19 July 2022

The Corbeiensis (saec. VI) seems not to have been mentioned in the first edition of the Clavis handbook, and was not included in the database.

See here https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:CRolker/Collectio_Corbeiensis

The collection is extant in only one manuscript and while it has been used for various editions, itself remains unedited. The most detailed description is by Kaiser. Wurm gives incipt and explicit of most decretal letters.

https://www.leges.uni-koeln.de/blog/herkunft/arles/

Categories

  • not in Clavis
  • saec. VI